Does the Wada Test Predict Memory Decline following Epilepsy Surgery?

2002 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roy C. Martin ◽  
Christopher L. Grote
2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-24
Author(s):  
William B Barr

[Box: see text]


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 872-872
Author(s):  
Hageboutros K ◽  
Bono A ◽  
Johnson-Markve B ◽  
Smith K ◽  
Lee G

Abstract Objective Mathematical models predicting risk of verbal memory decline after resective epilepsy surgery have been developed for patients undergoing temporal lobectomies. This study was undertaken to determine if application of the Stroup memory loss prediction model was as accurate in foreseeing verbal memory decline after temporal lobectomy as in the less invasive selective amygdalohippocampectomy procedure. Method This retrospective study examined the verbal memory performances of 40 left temporal lobectomy (ATL), and 16 left subtemporal approach selective amygdalohippocampectomy (SA-H), patients before and after epilepsy surgery using word list learning (Rey Auditory-Verbal Learning Test, Buschke Selective Reminding Test) and story memory (WMS Logical Memory) tests. Patients were assigned to one of four groups using the Stroup multiple regression equation: Minimal Risk (61% risk). To classify memory decline in individual patients, a pre-to-post surgery decrease of > 1 SD on at least one memory test constituted memory decline. Results The prediction model accurately classified 82% (9/11) of ATL, and 75% (3/4) of SA-H, High Risk patients. Verbal memory loss was higher among ATLs than SA-Hs in the Moderate Risk (87% vs. 18%) and Low Risk (71% vs. 0%) groups. Conclusion The Stroup verbal memory loss risk model under-predicted memory loss among temporal lobectomy patients (71% of Low Risk patients showed memory decline) and over-predicted memory loss among selective amygdalohippocampectomy patients (only 18% of Moderate Risk patients showed memory decline). Results should be considered preliminary due to methodological limitation including small Ns and unequal sample sizes.


Epilepsia ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 47 (11) ◽  
pp. 1887-1894 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sallie Baxendale ◽  
Pamela Thompson ◽  
William Harkness ◽  
John Duncan

Epilepsia ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 49 (8) ◽  
pp. 1377-1394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey R. Binder ◽  
David S. Sabsevitz ◽  
Sara J. Swanson ◽  
Thomas A. Hammeke ◽  
Manoj Raghavan ◽  
...  

Epilepsia ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory P. Lee ◽  
Michael Westerveld ◽  
Lynn B. Blackburn ◽  
Yong D. Park ◽  
David W. Loring

2020 ◽  
pp. 357-360
Author(s):  
H. Lelklou ◽  
M. Djellaoui ◽  
H. Si Ahmed ◽  
B. Yakoubi

Memory assessment is a crucial step in the pre-surgical assessment of temporal epilepsy. Indeed, it participates to a certain extent in the process of localization of the epileptogenic zone and also makes it possible to anticipate the possible risks of surgical treatment on the memory.We propose to specify the contribution of memory evaluation in 60 patients’ candidates for temporal epilepsy surgery, in terms of localization of the “epileptogenic zone” and in the appreciation of the risk of postoperative memory decline.


2004 ◽  
Vol 62 (2b) ◽  
pp. 444-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luciano de Paola ◽  
Maria Joana Mäder ◽  
Francisco M.B. Germiniani ◽  
Patrícia Coral ◽  
Jorge A.A. Zavala ◽  
...  

The intracarotid sodium amytal test (ISAT or Wada Test) is a commonly performed procedure in the evaluation of patients with clinically refractory epilepsy candidates to epilepsy surgery. Its goal is to promote selective and temporary interruption of hemispheric functioning, seeking to define language lateralization and risk for memory compromise following surgery. Behavioral modification is expected during the procedure. Even though it may last several minutes, in most cases it is subtle and easily manageable. We report a series of patients in whom those reactions were unusually bizarre, including agitation and aggression. Apart of the obvious technical difficulties (patients required physical restraining) those behaviors potentially promote testing delay or abortion and more importantly, inaccurate data. We reviewed those cases, seeking for features that might have predicted their occurrence. Overall, reactions are rare, seen in less than 5% of the ISAT procedures. The barbiturate effect, patients' psychiatric profiles, hemisphere dominance or selectiveness of the injection were not validated as predictors. Thorough explanation, repetition and simulation may be of help in lessening the risk of those reactions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document