scholarly journals Effect of Baculovirus penaei on Growth and Survival of Experimentally Infected Postlarvae of the Pacific White Shrimp, Penaeus vannamei

1994 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth C. Stuck ◽  
Robin M. Overstreet
Aquaculture ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 736905
Author(s):  
Aya S. Hussain ◽  
Deyaaedin A. Mohammad ◽  
Wafaa S. Sallam ◽  
Nahla M. Shoukry ◽  
D. Allen Davis

Author(s):  
Thomas Caceci ◽  
Kay F. Neck ◽  
Donal D H. Lewis ◽  
Raymond F. Sis

Fourteen specimens of the hepatopancreas of the Pacific white shrimp, Penaeus vannamei, were prepared for examination with the transmission and scanning electron microscopes and with the light microscope. The histology and ultrastructure of this organ is similar to that seen in other Decapoda. At the ultrastructural level, it was observed that B-cells rupture at approximately the level of gap junctions located on the lateral plasma membranes of the cells, and discharge the contents of their large vacuoles into the intercellular space. This efflux of enzymatic material may be the mechanism by which cells are released from the wall of the tubule at the proximal end: the rupture and collapse of a B-cell may be analagous to the removal of the keystone which supports an arch. Deprived of support, and lacking structural adaptations for cohesion (there are no desmosomes or interdigitations in the epithelium) and with the intercellular material digested, the remaining intact cells collapse into the lumen of the tubule. The lysis of individual cells of all types - R-, F-, and B-cells - may contribute to the tubules’ total complement of digestive enzymes.


2010 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 648-654 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. M. Esparza-Leal ◽  
J. T. Ponce-Palafox ◽  
W. Valenzuela-Quiñónez ◽  
J. L. Arredondo-Figueroa ◽  
Manuel García-Ulloa Gómez

Biotecnia ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 5-12
Author(s):  
Alejandro Mcdonal-Vera ◽  
Wilfrido M. Contreras-Sánchez ◽  
Neil J. Duncan ◽  
Kevin Fitzsimmons ◽  
Maria J. Contreras- García ◽  
...  

In the present investigation, we evaluated if the presence of tilapia affects growth and survival of shrimp during pre-growth and grow-out phases. In both experiments, we used a random-blocks design in a single earth pond (0.75 ha) that was prepared and divided into nine (7 x 30 m) enclosures that were considered to be three blocks of three enclosures each. Each randomly stocked block consisted on Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei (30 shrimp/m2) and three different densities (0.0, 0.25 and 0.50 fish/m2) of red tilapia hybrids (Oreochromis mossambicus x Oreochromis niloticus) to give three different treatments with three replicates. The results from the pre-growth and grow-out experiments followed the same trend. In both cases, we found no significant statistical differences (P>0.05) in the final average weight of the shrimp. However, the experimental blocks had a significant (P<0.05) effect on the mean sample weight of shrimp. Shrimp in blocks B and C were significantly bigger than shrimp from block A (P<0.05). For both experiments, we found no effect of the presence of tilapias on survival or growth of shrimp.RESUMENEvaluamos si la presencia de tilapias libres afecta el crecimiento y la supervivencia de camarones en fase de preengorda y engorda. Para ambos experimentos, utilizamos un diseño de bloques al azar en un estanque rústico (0.75 ha) que fue preparado y dividido en nueve encierros (7 x 30 m), se formaron tres bloques con tres encierros cada uno. Cada encierro dentro de cada bloque fue aleatoriamente seleccionado para sembrar camarón blanco del Pacífico, Litopenaeus vannamei (30 camarones/m2) y tres diferentes densidades (0.0, 0.25 y 0.50 peces/m2) de híbrido de tilapia roja (Oreochromis mossambicus x Oreochromis niloticus) para formar tres tratamientos con tres réplicas. Los resultados del experimento de pre-engorda y engorda siguieron la misma tendencia. En ambos experimentos no encontramos diferencias estadísticamente en el crecimiento de los camarones ni en las tilapias. Sin embargo, los bloques experimentales presentaron diferencias significativas (P<0.05) en el peso promedio final. Los camarones de los bloques B y C fueron estadísticamente más grandes (P<0.05) que los del bloque A. Para las dos etapas de crecimiento de los camarones, no se observó un efecto de la presencia de tilapias sobre la sobrevivencia o crecimiento de los camarones.


Aquaculture ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 131 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 155-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.T. Ostrowski-Meissner ◽  
B.R. LeaMaster ◽  
E.O. Duerr ◽  
W.A. Walsh

2020 ◽  
pp. 159-180
Author(s):  
Jeet K. Mishraa ◽  
Tzachi M. Samochaa ◽  
Susmita Patnaika ◽  
Mike Speed ◽  
Ryan L. Gandya ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 334-345
Author(s):  
Norma A. López‐Téllez ◽  
Juan A. Corbalá‐Bermejo ◽  
Marco L. Bustamante‐Unzueta ◽  
Laura P. Silva‐Ledesma ◽  
Víctor M. Vidal‐Martínez ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document