Stainless Steel Rebar for Seismic Applications

2007 ◽  
pp. 255-264
Author(s):  
Alberto Franchi ◽  
Pietro Crespi ◽  
Aldo Bennani ◽  
Marco Farinet
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Steel Rebar ◽  
Seismic Applications

scholarly journals LCA and LCC of the world’s longest pier: a case study on nickel-containing stainless steel rebar

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 1637-1644 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Mistry ◽  
Christoph Koffler ◽  
Sophia Wong
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Steel Rebar

Evaluation of the Proposed European Test Procedure for Ranking Stainless Steel Rebar

CORROSION ◽  
10.5006/2000 ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 72 (6) ◽  
pp. 834-842 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.B. Van Niejenhuis ◽  
T.W. Bandura ◽  
C.M. Hansson
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Test Procedure ◽  
Steel Rebar

Stainless steel rebar: the choice of service life

2006 ◽  
Vol 103 (2) ◽  
pp. 89-95
Author(s):  
C. Bourgin ◽  
E. Chauveau ◽  
B. Demelin
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Service Life ◽  
Steel Rebar

scholarly journals A Comparative Test Study of the Impact Performances of Stainless-Steel Rebar Equal-Strength Replacement Piers

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-79
Author(s):  
Xiwu Zhou ◽  
Wenchao Zhang ◽  
Yushen Gao ◽  
Guoxue Zhang ◽  
Ruisheng Xiong
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Comparative Test ◽  
Steel Rebar ◽  
Equal Strength ◽  
Test Study ◽  
The Impact

Threshold Chloride Concentrations of Selected Corrosion-Resistant Rebar Materials Compared to Carbon Steel

CORROSION ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 62 (10) ◽  
pp. 892-904 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. F. Hurley ◽  
J. R. Scully
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Carbon Steel ◽  
Chloride Concentration ◽  
Test Method ◽  
Molar Ratio ◽  
Corrosion Resistant ◽  
Steel Rebar ◽  
Chloride Threshold ◽  
Type 316L ◽  
Solid Type

Abstract The threshold chloride concentration for solid Type 316LN (UNS S31653) stainless steel, Type 316L (UNS S31603) stainless steel clad, 2101 (UNS S32101), Fe-9%Cr, and carbon steel rebar (ordinary ASTM A 615M) was investigated using potentiodynamic and potentiostatic current monitoring techniques in saturated calcium hydroxide (Ca[OH]2) + sodium chloride (NaCl) solutions. There is general consensus in this study and the literature that the chloride threshold for carbon steel is less than a chloride to hydroxl (Cl−/OH−) molar ratio of 1. Solid Type 316LN stainless steel rebar was found to have a much higher chloride threshold (i.e., threshold Cl−/OH− ratio > 20) than carbon steel (0.25 < Cl−/OH−< 0.34). Type 316L stainless steel clad rebar possessed a chloride threshold expressed as a Cl−/OH− ratio of 4.9 when cladding was intact. However, surface preparation, test method, duration of period exposed to a passivating condition prior to the introduction of chloride, and the presence of cladding defects all affected the threshold chloride concentration obtained. For instance, the presence of mill scale on any of the more corrosion-resistant materials reduced the chloride threshold to approximately that of carbon steel. The chloride threshold for Type 316L clad rebar was highly dependent on any defects that exposed the carbon steel core. At best, it was similar to that of solid stainless steel. However, when defective, it was equal to that of carbon steel rebar in the potentiostatic method used here. A model was implemented to predict the extension of the Cl− diffusion time period until corrosion initiation would be expected using rebar materials with a higher chloride threshold concentration than carbon steel. Model results confirmed that corrosion-resistant rebar materials in a pickled condition may increase time until chloride-induced breakdown of passivity and onset of corrosion to 100 years or more.

Strength Degradation and Energy Dissipation of Stainless Steel Reinforced Concrete Columns

2011 ◽  
Vol 90-93 ◽  
pp. 1614-1617
Author(s):  
Guo Xue Zhang ◽  
Chang Wei Wang ◽  
Zhi Hao Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Reinforced Concrete ◽  
Energy Dissipation ◽  
Ductile Failure ◽  
Concrete Columns ◽  
Strength Degradation ◽  
Reinforced Concrete Columns ◽  
Failure Characteristics ◽  
Steel Reinforced Concrete ◽  
Steel Rebar

Three specimens with ribbed stainless steel rebar and one specimen with ribbed ordinary steel rebar are tested concerning the strength degradation and energy dissipation of stainless steel reinforced concrete columns. The tests results indicate that the damage of the specimens exhibit ductile failure characteristics, and the reinforced concrete columns with stainless steel rebar damage to a lesser extent, appear good ductility and energy dissipation. The strength degradation of stainless steel reinforced column with high axial compression ratio is quite obvious, and with the increasing of the stirrup ratio of column with stainless steel rebar, the strength of column is enhanced.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document