Temporal Active Rules

1999 ◽  
pp. 159-172
Author(s):  
Mati Golani ◽  
Opher Etzion
Keyword(s):  
Active Rules

WITHDRAWN: A concurrent rule scheduling algorithm for active rules☆

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Jin ◽  
Susan D. Urban ◽  
Suzanne W. Dietrich
Keyword(s):  
Scheduling Algorithm ◽  
Active Rules

Markup and Component Interoperability for Active Rules

2008 ◽  
pp. 197-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oliver Fritzen ◽  
Wolfgang May ◽  
Franz Schenk
Keyword(s):  
Active Rules

Extending the OBJECTIVE Benchmark for Evaluation of Active Rules in a Distributed Component Integration Environment

2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 47-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Jin ◽  
Susan D. Urban ◽  
Suzanne W. Dietrich
Keyword(s):  
Active Rules ◽  
Component Integration

Active Rules and Active Databases

2011 ◽  
pp. 234-261
Author(s):  
Juan M. Ale ◽  
Mauricio M. Espil
Keyword(s):  
Active Databases ◽  
Active Rules

Preserving Relationship Cardinality Constraints in Relational Schemata

2002 ◽  
pp. 66-112
Author(s):  
Dolores Cuadra ◽  
Carlos Nieto ◽  
Paloma Martinez ◽  
Elena Castro ◽  
Manuel Velasco
Keyword(s):  
Relational Model ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Methodological Framework ◽  
Cardinality Constraint ◽  
Cardinality Constraints ◽  
Active Rules ◽  
Model Following ◽  
Methodological Approaches ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Practical Implications

This chapter is devoted to the study of the transformation of conceptual into logical schemata in a methodological framework focusing on a special ER construct: the relationship and its associated cardinality constraints. The section entitled “EER Model Revised: relationships and cardinality constraint” reviews the relationship and cardinality constraint constructs through different methodological approaches to establish the cardinality constraint definition that will be followed in next sections. The section “Transformation of EER Schemata into Relational Schemata” is related to the transformation of conceptual n-ary relationships (n³2) into the relational model following an active rules approach. Finally, several practical implications as well as future research paths are presented.

Abstract interpretation of active rules and its use in termination analysis

1997 ◽  
pp. 188-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Bailey ◽  
Lobel Crnogorac ◽  
Kotagiri Ramamohanarao ◽  
Harald Søndergaard
Keyword(s):  
Abstract Interpretation ◽  
Active Rules ◽  
Termination Analysis

Declarative semantics for active rules

2001 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
SERGIO FLESCA ◽  
SERGIO GRECO
Keyword(s):  
Active Rules ◽  
Declarative Semantics
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document