Intracranial Self-Stimulation and the Curve-Shift Paradigm: A Putative Model to Study the Brain

Author(s):  
Marc Fakhoury ◽  
Pierre-Paul Rompré
1962 ◽  
Vol 203 (2) ◽  
pp. 371-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Stark ◽  
Giovanni Fazio ◽  
Eugene S. Boyd

Intracranial self-stimulation experiments in the dog using a two-wire electrode, with each wire used as a monopolar electrode and the combination as a bipolar electrode, show that monopolar stimulation may produce either a higher or a lower rate of response than that produced by bipolar stimulation. A theoretical consideration of the changes in current density around the electrode when it is changed from a monopolar to a bipolar electrode shows that such differences are to be expected. The exact location of the structure being stimulated with reference to the two electrode tips will determine whether the structure is subjected to a higher current density on monopolar or on bipolar stimulation.


Science ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 224 (4646) ◽  
pp. 306-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Porrino ◽  
R. Esposito ◽  
T. Seeger ◽  
A. Crane ◽  
A Pert ◽  
...  

1962 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 455-462 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zola P. Horovitz ◽  
May-I. Chow ◽  
Peter L. Carlton

1971 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 655-665 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irmingard I. Lenzer

The effects of two concurrently changing drive variables, food deprivation and estrogen level, on the self-stimulation rate in the hypothalamus, septum, caudate nucleus, or dorsal hippocampus of 15 female albino rats were studied. When the effects of hunger were calculated using only scores on days of diestrus and the effects of estrogen were calculated using only scores on days of 0-hr. food deprivation, the correlation of these hunger and estrogen effects amounted to 0.67. When the hunger effects were calculated using only scores on days of estrus and these hunger effects correlated with the previously calculated estrogen effects, the correlation amounted to −0.49. These results are consistent with the concept of diffuse overlapping motivational systems in the brain. Controls indicated that the changes in self-stimulation rate were not artifacts of changes in nonspecific activity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document