Microcomputer-aided Diagnosis of Jaundice (Solubile)

1988 ◽  
pp. 175-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Newman ◽  
E. W. F. W. Alton ◽  
F. R. Vicary ◽  
J. Hooper
Keyword(s):  
Aided Diagnosis

Computer-Aided Diagnosis in Jaundice: Comparison of Knowledge-based and Probabilistic Approaches

1996 ◽  
Vol 35 (01) ◽  
pp. 41-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Molino ◽  
D. Furia ◽  
F. Bar ◽  
S. Battista ◽  
N. Cappello ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Presentation ◽  
Clinical Information ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Clinical Findings ◽  
Clinical Documentation ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Knowledge Based ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Support Tools ◽  
Aided Diagnosis

AbstractThe study reported in this paper is aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of a knowledge-based expert system (ICTERUS) in diagnosing jaundiced patients, compared with a statistical system based on probabilistic concepts (TRIAL). The performances of both systems have been evaluated using the same set of data in the same number of patients. Both systems are spin-off products of the European project Euricterus, an EC-COMACBME Project designed to document the occurrence and diagnostic value of clinical findings in the clinical presentation of jaundice in Europe, and have been developed as decision-making tools for the identification of the cause of jaundice based only on clinical information and routine investigations. Two groups of jaundiced patients were studied, including 500 (retrospective sample) and 100 (prospective sample) subjects, respectively. All patients were independently submitted to both decision-support tools. The input of both systems was the data set agreed within the Euricterus Project. The performances of both systems were evaluated with respect to the reference diagnoses provided by experts on the basis of the full clinical documentation. Results indicate that both systems are clinically reliable, although the diagnostic prediction provided by the knowledge-based approach is slightly better.

Pattern-Recognition: A Comparison of the Performance of Clinicians and Non-Clinicians - with a Note on the Performance of a Computer-Based System

1972 ◽  
Vol 11 (01) ◽  
pp. 32-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. T. DE DOMBAL ◽  
J. C. HORROCKS ◽  
J. R. STANILAND ◽  
P. J. GUILLOU
Keyword(s):  
Pattern Recognition ◽  
Computer System ◽  
Computer Aided Diagnosis ◽  
Clinical Interview ◽  
Computer Performance ◽  
Pattern Size ◽  
Computer Aided ◽  
Computer Based ◽  
Aided Diagnosis ◽  
Better Than

This paper describes a series of 10,500 attempts at »pattern-recognition« by two groups of humans and a computer based system. There was little difference between the performances of 11 clinicians and 11 other persons of comparable intellectual capability. Both groups’ performances were related to the pattern-size, the accuracy diminishing rapidly as the patterns grew larger. By contrast the computer system increased its accuracy as the patterns increased in size.It is suggested (a) that clinicians are very little better than others at pattem-recognition, (b) that the clinician is incapable of analysing on a probabilistic basis the data he collects during a traditional clinical interview and examination and (c) that the study emphasises once again a major difference between human and computer performance. The implications as - regards human- and computer-aided diagnosis are discussed.

COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS OF GASTRIC LESIONS USING MAGNIFYING NARROW BAND IMAGING ENDOSCOPY

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Kashin ◽  
R Kuvaev ◽  
E Kraynova ◽  
H Edelsbrunner ◽  
O Dunaeva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Narrow Band ◽  
Narrow Band Imaging ◽  
Computer Aided Diagnosis ◽  
Gastric Lesions ◽  
Computer Aided ◽  
Aided Diagnosis
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document