Memory Strategy Instruction During Adolescence: When is Explicit Instruction Needed?

1983 ◽  
pp. 25-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Pressley ◽  
Joel R. Levin ◽  
Susan L. Bryant
Keyword(s):  
Explicit Instruction ◽  
Strategy Instruction ◽  
Memory Strategy

scholarly journals Explicit instruction and implicit use of L2 learning strategies in higher secondary EFL course books

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mª Camino Bueno-Alastuey ◽  
Gloria Luque Agulló
Keyword(s):  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Strategy ◽  
Explicit Instruction ◽  
Strategy Instruction ◽  
Oral Proficiency ◽  
Explicit Strategy Instruction ◽  
L2 Learning ◽  
Higher Secondary Education ◽  
Oral Skills ◽  
Listening And Speaking

<p>Research has shown that teaching second language (L2) learning strategies explicitly promotes an increase in strategy use and in oral proficiency. Consequently, a checklist based on the six types of strategies from Oxford’s taxonomy (1990) was created to analyze strategic instruction in the most common textbooks used in the last year of Higher Secondary Education in Spain. The study considered whether there was explicit strategy instruction and its location (within the units [Internal] or in other sections [External]) in course books, and what specific strategies were explicitly taught for the two oral skills, listening and speaking. Results showed, first, that there was explicit internal and external instruction of L2 learning strategies both for listening and speaking, but not in all the books; second, that there was significantly more implicit use than explicit instruction, and less explicit instruction in the units of the textbooks than in specific extra sections in the textbook or in support material; and finally, that internal explicit instruction of strategies remains very limited; and thus, L2 learning strategy instruction, competence and use may not be sufficiently encouraged in those textbooks.</p>

scholarly journals The Effect of Explicit Instruction of Metacognitive Reading Strategies on ESP Reading Comprehension in Academic Settings

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 77
Author(s):  
Parviz Ajideh ◽  
Mohammad Zohrabi ◽  
Kazem Pouralvar
Keyword(s):  
Reading Comprehension ◽  
Language Learning ◽  
Reading Strategies ◽  
Explicit Instruction ◽  
Language Skills ◽  
Strategy Instruction ◽  
Islamic Art ◽  
Efl Learners ◽  
Metacognitive Reading Strategies ◽  
The Impact

This study investigated the effect of explicit instruction of metacognitive reading strategies on ESP reading comprehension among university students in Iran. Strategy instruction has recently been integrated into language teaching methodologies, stressing that successful language learners take advantage of appropriate strategy selection and application in order to develop better language skills. Poor learners, on the other hand, fail to know how to use strategies and for what purposes. There has been ample research on the impact of explicit strategy instruction on the EFL learners’ language skills. These studies indicate the effectiveness of strategy instruction on the various aspects of language learning such as skill development among EFL learners but the notion of the effectiveness of strategy instruction on ESP reading comprehension in university level has not been much scrutinized in Iranian context. The participants in this study included undergraduate first and second year students studying Islamic Art and Architecture Engineering at Tabriz Islamic Art University. A randomized subjects and posttest-only control group design was employed in this study. The number of students in Art control and experimental groups was 28 and the one for Architecture control and experimental group was 26 students. The participants in the experimental groups received explicit instruction of metacognitive reading strategies through the Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach (CALLA) for strategy instruction. The results of independent t-test revealed that the students in the experimental groups outperformed those in the control groups and showed greater achievement in their ESP reading comprehension ability.

Memory Strategy Instruction with Children

1982 ◽  
pp. 125-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Pressley ◽  
Brian E. Heisel ◽  
Christine B. McCormick ◽  
Glenn V. Nakamura
Keyword(s):  
Strategy Instruction ◽  
Memory Strategy

Interventions to Improve Fraction Skills for Students With Disabilities: A Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 85 (3) ◽  
pp. 367-386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin Parks Ennis ◽  
Mickey Losinski
Keyword(s):  
Students With Disabilities ◽  
Quality Indicators ◽  
Video Modeling ◽  
Explicit Instruction ◽  
Single Case ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Strategy Instruction ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Meta Analyses

Proficiency with fractions is one of the most significant predictors of later mathematics achievement. However, there are currently no meta-analyses that assess the literature base on fractions for students with or at risk for disabilities using quality indicators. We applied the 2014 Council for Exceptional Children Standards for Evidence-Based Practices in Special Education (CEC EBP) to 21 studies, both single-case and group designs, with instructionally based fraction interventions, published from 1986 to 2017. Ten of the included studies met all of the CEC EBP quality indicators, and effect sizes ranged from g = 0.42 to 11.51 across interventions. Publication bias was mixed but limited across the research base. Included studies examined the effects of anchored instruction, explicit instruction, graduated instruction, strategy instruction, and video modeling; explicit instruction was determined to be an evidence-based practice when applying the CEC EBP standards. We offer limitations and directions for future research in this area.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document