Performance of Recent Gravity Field Models in Precision Orbit Determination Using Doppler Observations

1992 ◽  
pp. 45-50
Author(s):  
Patrick J. Fell ◽  
C. Harris Seay
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Field ◽  
Orbit Determination ◽  
Precision Orbit Determination ◽  
Gravity Field Models

Orbit determination of the SELENE satellites using multi-satellite data types and evaluation of SELENE gravity field models

2011 ◽  
Vol 85 (8) ◽  
pp. 487-504 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Goossens ◽  
K. Matsumoto ◽  
D. D. Rowlands ◽  
F. G. Lemoine ◽  
H. Noda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Field ◽  
Satellite Data ◽  
Orbit Determination ◽  
Data Types ◽  
Gravity Field Models

scholarly journals Effects of New Level-1B Data on GRACE Temporal Gravity Field Models and Precise Orbit Determination Solutions

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (20) ◽  
pp. 4119
Author(s):  
Nannan Guo ◽  
Xuhua Zhou ◽  
Kai Li
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Field ◽  
Orbit Determination ◽  
Field Model ◽  
Precise Orbit Determination ◽  
Satellite Orbit ◽  
Data Types ◽  
Gravity Field Model ◽  
Precise Orbit ◽  
Temporal Gravity ◽  
Gravity Field Models

The quality of Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) observation is the prerequisite for obtaining the high-precision GRACE temporal gravity field model. To study the influence of new-generation GRACE Level-1B Release 03 (RL03) data and the new atmosphere and ocean de-aliasing (AOD1B) products on recovering temporal gravity field models and precise orbit determination (POD) solutions, we combined the global positioning system and K-band ranging-rate (KBRR) observations of GRACE satellites to estimate the effect of different data types on these solutions. The POD and monthly gravity field solutions are obtained from 2005 to 2010 by SHORDE software developed by the Shanghai Astronomical Observatory. The post-fit residuals of the KBRR data were decreased by approximately 10%, the precision of three-direction positions of the GRACE POD was improved by approximately 5%, and the signal-to-noise ratio of the monthly gravity field model was enhanced. The improvements in the new release of monthly gravity field model and POD solutions can be attributed to the enhanced Level-1B KBRR data and the AOD1B model. These improvements were primarily due to the enhanced of KBRR data; the effect of the AOD1B model was not significant. The results also showed that KBRR data slightly improve the satellite orbit precision, and obviously enhance the precision of the gravity field model.

scholarly journals Sensitivity of Lageos Orbits to Global Gravity Field Models

2012 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 47-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Sośnica ◽  
D. Thaller ◽  
A. Jäggi ◽  
R. Dach ◽  
G. Beutler
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Field ◽  
Orbit Determination ◽  
Measurement Techniques ◽  
Precise Orbit Determination ◽  
Satellite Orbits ◽  
Gravity Field Model ◽  
Global Gravity ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Gravity Field Models

Sensitivity of Lageos Orbits to Global Gravity Field ModelsPrecise orbit determination is an essential task when analyzing SLR data. The quality of the satellite orbits strongly depends on the models used for dynamic orbit determination. The global gravity field model used is one of the crucial elements, which has a significant influence on the satellite orbit and its accuracy. We study the impact of different gravity field models on the determination of the LAGEOS-1 and -2 orbits for data of the year 2008. Eleven gravity field models are compared, namely JGM3 and EGM96 based mainly on SLR, terrestrial and altimetry data, AIUB-CHAMP03S based uniquely on GPS-measurements made by CHAMP, AIUB-GRACE03S, ITG-GRACE2010 based on GRACE data, and the combined gravity field models based on different measurement techniques, such as EGM2008, EIGEN-GL04C, EIGEN51C, GOCO02S, GO-CONS-2-DIR-R2, AIUB-SST. The gravity field models are validated using the RMS of the observation residuals of 7-day LAGEOS solutions. The study reveals that GRACE-based models have the smallest RMS values (i.e., about 7.15 mm), despite the fact that no SLR data were used to determine them. The coefficient C20is not always well estimated in GRACE-only models. There is a significant improvement of the gravity field models based on CHAMP, GRACE and GOCE w.r.t. models of the pre-CHAMP era. The LAGEOS orbits are particularly sensitive to the long wavelength part of the gravity fields. Differences of the estimated orbits due to different gravity field models are noticeable up to degree and order of about 30. The RMS of residuals improves from about 40 mm for degree 8, to about 7 mm for the solutions up to degrees 14 and higher. The quality of the predicted orbits is studied, as well.

Chang’E-1 precision orbit determination and lunar gravity field solution

2010 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Jianguo ◽  
Ping Jinsong ◽  
Li Fei ◽  
Cao Jianfeng ◽  
Huang Qian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Field ◽  
Orbit Determination ◽  
Lunar Gravity ◽  
Lunar Gravity Field ◽  
Field Solution ◽  
Precision Orbit Determination

Preliminary monthly gravity field models from kinematic orbits of SWARM Satellites

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xingfu Zhang ◽  
Qiujie Chen ◽  
Yunzhong Shen
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Field ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Earth System ◽  
The Earth ◽  
Swarm Satellites ◽  
Variable Gravity ◽  
Data Gap ◽  
One Year ◽  
Gravity Recovery ◽  
Gravity Field Models

<p>      Although the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) and GRACE Follow-On (GRACE FO) satellite missions play an important role in monitoring global mass changes within the Earth system, there is a data gap of about one year spanning July 2017 to May 2018, which leads to discontinuous gravity observations for monitoring global mass changes. As an alternative mission, the SWARM satellites can provide gravity observations to close this data gap. In this paper, we are dedicated to developing alternative monthly time-variable gravity field solutions from SWARM data. Using kinematic orbits of SWARM from ITSG for the period January 2015 to September 2020, we have generated a preliminary time series of monthly gravity field models named Tongji-Swarm2019 up to degree and order 60. The comparisons between Tongji-Swarm2019 and GRACE/GRACE-FO monthly solutions show that Tongji-Swarm2019 solutions agree with GRACE/GRACE-FO models in terms of large-scale mass change signals over amazon, Greenland and other regions. We can conclude that Tongji-Swarm2019 monthly gravity field models are able to close the gap between GRACE and GRACE FO.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document