Hematolymphoid Neoplasms

Author(s):  
Scott R. Owens ◽  
Henry D. Appelman
1999 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 104-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peiguo G. Chu ◽  
Karen L. Chang ◽  
Daniel A. Arber ◽  
Lawrence M. Weiss

Author(s):  
Loren Clarke ◽  
Jennie Clarke ◽  
Klaus Helm

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. 200409
Author(s):  
Alexis Trecourt ◽  
Brigitte Balme ◽  
Marie-Hélène Lorton ◽  
Juliette Fontaine ◽  
Pauline Desormeaux ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 152 (3) ◽  
pp. 258-276
Author(s):  
Olga K Weinberg ◽  
Frank Kuo ◽  
Katherine R Calvo

Abstract Objectives The 2017 Workshop of the Society for Hematopathology/European Association for Haematopathology aimed to review clinical cases with germline predisposition to hematolymphoid neoplasms. Methods The Workshop Panel reviewed 51 cases with germline mutations and rendered consensus diagnoses. Of these, six cases were presented at the meeting by the submitting pathologists. Results The cases submitted to the session covering germline predisposition included 16 cases with germline GATA2 mutations, 10 cases with germline RUNX1 mutations, two cases with germline CEBPA mutations, two germline TP53 mutations, and one case of germline DDX41 mutation. The most common diagnoses were acute myeloid leukemia (15 cases) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS, 14 cases). Conclusions The majority of the submitted neoplasms occurring in patients with germline predisposition were myeloid neoplasms with germline mutations in GATA2 and RUNX1. The presence of a germline predisposition mutation is not sufficient for a diagnosis of a neoplasm until the appearance of standard diagnostic features of a hematolymphoid malignancy manifest: in general, the diagnostic criteria for neoplasms associated with germline predisposition disorders are the same as those for sporadic cases.


1997 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 203-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shashikant Chittal ◽  
Talal Al Saati ◽  
Georges Delsol

2017 ◽  
Vol 141 (3) ◽  
pp. 341-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shiyong Li ◽  
David L. Jaye ◽  
Kyle T. Bradley ◽  
Linsheng Zhang ◽  
Debra Saxe ◽  
...  

Accurate assessment of tissues for hematolymphoid neoplasms requires an integrated multiparameter approach. Although morphologic examination by light microscopy remains the mainstay of initial assessment for hematolymphoid neoplasms, immunophenotypic analysis by immunohistochemistry and/or flow cytometry is essential to determine the pattern of differentiation and to detect minimal disease when morphology is inconclusive. In some cases, immunophenotypic analysis provides additional information for targeted immunotherapy and prognostication. Genotypic studies, including cytogenetics, fluorescence in situ hybridization, DNA microarray, polymerase chain reaction, and/or next-generation sequencing, are also imperative for subclassification of the genetically defined disease entities in the current World Health Organization classification of hematolymphoid neoplasms. Moreover, genotypic studies can establish clonality, stratify patients to determine appropriate treatment, and monitor patients for treatment response.


2015 ◽  
Vol 144 (3) ◽  
pp. 377-392 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Vega ◽  
L. Jeffrey Medeiros ◽  
Carlos E. Bueso-Ramos ◽  
Patricia Arboleda ◽  
Roberto N. Miranda

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document