Performances of a Compact, High-Power WB Source with Circular Polarization

Author(s):  
P. Delmote ◽  
S. Pinguet ◽  
F. Bieth
2016 ◽  
Vol 05 (02) ◽  
pp. 1650001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angel Otarola ◽  
Paul Hickson ◽  
Ronald Gagné ◽  
Yong Bo ◽  
Junwei Zuo ◽  
...  

We present results of on-sky tests performed in the summer of 2013 to characterize the performance of a prototype high-power pulsed laser for adaptive optics. The laser operates at a pulse repetition rate (PRR) of 600–800[Formula: see text]Hz, with a 6% duty cycle. Its coupling efficiency was found to be, in the best test case (using 18[Formula: see text]W of transmitted power), [Formula: see text] photons s[Formula: see text] sr[Formula: see text] atom[Formula: see text] W[Formula: see text] m2 when circular polarization was employed and [Formula: see text] photons s[Formula: see text] sr[Formula: see text] atom[Formula: see text] W[Formula: see text] m2 with linear polarization. No improvement was seen when D[Formula: see text] repumping was used, but this is likely due to the relatively large laser guide star (LGS) diameter, typically 10 arcsec or more, which resulted in low irradiance levels. Strong relaxation oscillations were present in the laser output, which have the effect of reducing the coupling efficiency. To better understand the results, a physical modeling was performed using the measured pulse profiles and parameters specific to these tests. The model results, for a 10 arcsec angular size LGS spot, agree well with the observations. When extrapolating the physical model for a sub-arcsecond angular size LGS (typical of what is needed for a successful astronomical guide star), the model predicts that this laser would have a coupling efficiency of 130 photons s[Formula: see text] sr[Formula: see text] atom[Formula: see text] W[Formula: see text] m2, using circular polarization and D[Formula: see text] repumping, for a LGS diameter of 0.6 arcsec Full Width at Half Maximum (FWHM), and free of relaxation oscillations in the 589 nm laser light.


2005 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 208-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Watson ◽  
Carl Byington ◽  
Douglas Edwards ◽  
Sanket Amin

2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petra C. Schmid

Abstract. Power facilitates goal pursuit, but how does power affect the way people respond to conflict between their multiple goals? Our results showed that higher trait power was associated with reduced experience of conflict in scenarios describing multiple goals (Study 1) and between personal goals (Study 2). Moreover, manipulated low power increased individuals’ experience of goal conflict relative to high power and a control condition (Studies 3 and 4), with the consequence that they planned to invest less into the pursuit of their goals in the future. With its focus on multiple goals and individuals’ experiences during goal pursuit rather than objective performance, the present research uses new angles to examine power effects on goal pursuit.


2016 ◽  
Vol 101 (5) ◽  
pp. 721-730 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shirli Kopelman ◽  
Ashley E. Hardin ◽  
Christopher G. Myers ◽  
Leigh Plunkett Tost
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea C. Vial ◽  
Jaime L. Napier
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document