The Processing of Auditory Stimuli for Eye Movements in the Posterior Parietal Cortex of Monkeys

Author(s):  
Richard A. Andersen ◽  
Alexander Grunewald ◽  
Jennifer F. Linden
2019 ◽  
Vol 122 (4) ◽  
pp. 1765-1776 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryam Ghahremani ◽  
Kevin D. Johnston ◽  
Liya Ma ◽  
Lauren K. Hayrynen ◽  
Stefan Everling

The common marmoset ( Callithrix jacchus) is a small-bodied New World primate increasing in prominence as a model animal for neuroscience research. The lissencephalic cortex of this primate species provides substantial advantages for the application of electrophysiological techniques such as high-density and laminar recordings, which have the capacity to advance our understanding of local and laminar cortical circuits and their roles in cognitive and motor functions. This is particularly the case with respect to the oculomotor system, as critical cortical areas of this network such as the frontal eye fields (FEF) and lateral intraparietal area (LIP) lie deep within sulci in macaques. Studies of cytoarchitecture and connectivity have established putative homologies between cortical oculomotor fields in marmoset and macaque, but physiological investigations of these areas, particularly in awake marmosets, have yet to be carried out. Here we addressed this gap by probing the function of posterior parietal cortex of the common marmoset with electrical microstimulation. We implanted two animals with 32-channel Utah arrays at the location of the putative area LIP and applied microstimulation while they viewed a video display and made untrained eye movements. Similar to previous studies in macaques, stimulation evoked fixed-vector and goal-directed saccades, staircase saccades, and eyeblinks. These data demonstrate that area LIP of the marmoset plays a role in the regulation of eye movements, provide additional evidence that this area is homologous with that of the macaque, and further establish the marmoset as a valuable model for neurophysiological investigations of oculomotor and cognitive control. NEW & NOTEWORTHY The macaque monkey has been the preeminent model for investigations of oculomotor control, but studies of cortical areas are limited, as many of these areas are buried within sulci in this species. Here we applied electrical microstimulation to the putative area LIP of the lissencephalic cortex of awake marmosets. Similar to the macaque, microstimulation evoked contralateral saccades from this area, supporting the marmoset as a valuable model for studies of oculomotor control.


2012 ◽  
Vol 25 (0) ◽  
pp. 16
Author(s):  
Davide Nardo ◽  
Valerio Santangelo ◽  
Emiliano Macaluso

Mechanisms of audiovisual attention have been extensively investigated, yet little is known about their functioning in ecologically-valid situations. Here, we investigated brain activity associated with audiovisual stimulus-driven attention using naturalistic stimuli. We created 120 short videos (2.5 s) showing scenes of everyday life. Each video included a visual event comprising a lateralized (left/right) increase in visual saliency (e.g., an actor moving an object), plus a co-occurring sound either on the same or the opposite side of space. Subjects viewed the videos with/without the associated sounds, and either in covert (central fixation) or overt (eye-movements allowed) viewing conditions. For each stimulus, we used computational models (‘saliency maps’) to characterize auditory and visual stimulus-driven signals, and eye-movements (recorded in free viewing) as a measure of the efficacy of these signals for spatial orienting. Results showed that visual saliency modulated activity in the occipital cortex contralateral to the visual event; while auditory saliency modulated activity in the superior temporal gyrus bilaterally. In the posterior parietal cortex activity increased with increasing auditory saliency, but only when the auditory stimulus was on the same side as the visual event. The efficacy of the stimulus-driven signals modulated activity in the visual cortex. We conclude that: (1) audiovisual attention can be successfully investigated in real-like situations; (2) activity in sensory areas reflects a combination of stimulus-driven signals (saliency) and their efficacy for spatial orienting; (3) posterior parietal cortex processes auditory input as a function of its spatial relationship with the visual input.


1991 ◽  
Vol 65 (6) ◽  
pp. 1243-1253 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. D. Kurylo ◽  
A. A. Skavenski

1. Eye positions of monkeys were tracked while low-current electrical stimulation was delivered to area PG of the posterior parietal cortex. Stimulation was delivered while monkeys were in darkness, while they were in a dimly illuminated room, or while they actively fixated on small lamps to receive a liquid reward. 2. Resulting eye movements fell into one of three categories, depending roughly on the area stimulated. Stimulation of caudal regions generally resulted in saccades that were of approximately equivalent amplitudes and directions. When more rostral areas were stimulated, saccades were generally produced that directed the eyes toward roughly the same position in the head. Distributed throughout all regions were sites for which elicited saccades did not fall clearly into either of these coordinate bases. Stimulation of lateral areas produced low-velocity eye movements that were directed ipsilaterally from the stimulated hemisphere. 3. Stimulation made while monkeys fixated on target lamps produced saccades with more variability and less amplitude than those produced while monkeys were in darkness. Low-velocity eye movements could only be elicited while monkeys were in darkness. 4. Craniocentric saccades typically brought the eyes to within a 10-20 degrees area, and saccades could not be produced when the initial eye position was near this area. Craniocentric saccades were always greater than 5 degrees in amplitude. 5. It is concluded that area PG is organized into at least two zones that differ in the way by which they code saccades. A caudal region codes saccades in a way similar to that found in the frontal cortex and superior colliculus of primates. A rostral region codes saccades in a craniocentric manner, although it is restricted only to gross redirection of gaze without the accuracy monkeys are capable of using in directing their eyes.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryam Ghahremani ◽  
Kevin D. Johnston ◽  
Liya Ma ◽  
Lauren K. Hayrynen ◽  
Stefan Everling

AbstractThe common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) is a small-bodied New World primate, increasing in prominence as a model animal for neuroscience research. The lissencephalic cortex of this primate species provides substantial advantages for the application of electrophysiological techniques such as high-density and laminar recordings, which have the capacity to advance our understanding of local and laminar cortical circuits and their roles in cognitive and motor functions. This is particularly the case with respect to the oculomotor system, as critical cortical areas of this network such as the frontal eye fields (FEF) and lateral intraparietal area (LIP) lie deep within sulci in macaques. Studies of cytoarchitecture and connectivity have established putative homologies between cortical oculomotor fields in marmoset and macaque, but physiological investigations of these areas, particularly in awake marmosets, have yet to be carried out. Here, we addressed this gap by probing the function of posterior parietal cortex (PPC) of the common marmoset using electrical microstimulation. We implanted two animals with 32-channel Utah arrays at the location of the putative area LIP and applied microstimulation while they viewed a video display and made untrained eye movements. Similar to previous studies in macaques, stimulation evoked fixed-vector and goal-directed saccades, staircase saccades, and eye blinks. These data demonstrate that area LIP of the marmoset plays a role in the regulation of eye movements, provide additional evidence that this area is homologous with that of the macaque, and further establish the marmoset as valuable model for neurophysiological investigations of oculomotor and cognitive control.New & NoteworthyThe macaque monkey has been the preeminent model for investigations of oculomotor control, but studies of cortical areas are limited as many of these areas are buried within sulci in this species. Here we applied electrical microstimulation to the putative area LIP of the lissencephalic cortex of awake marmosets. Similar to the macaque, microstimulation evoked contralateral saccades from this area, supporting the marmoset as a valuable model for studies of oculomotor control.


NeuroImage ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 304-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina S Konen ◽  
Raimund Kleiser ◽  
Hans-Jörg Wittsack ◽  
Frank Bremmer ◽  
Rüdiger J Seitz

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liya Ma ◽  
Janahan Selvanayagam ◽  
Maryam Ghahremani ◽  
Lauren K. Hayrynen ◽  
Kevin D. Johnston ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTAbnormal saccadic eye movements can serve as biomarkers for patients with several neuropsychiatric disorders. To investigate cortical control mechanisms of saccadic responses, the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) is a promising non-human primate model. Their lissencephalic brain allows for accurate targeting of homologues of sulcal areas in the macaque brain. Here we recorded single unit activity in the posterior parietal cortex of two marmosets using chronic microelectrode arrays, while the monkeys performed a saccadic task with Gap trials (stimulus onset lagged fixation point offset by 200ms) interleaved with Step trials (fixation point disappeared when the peripheral stimulus appeared). Both marmosets showed a gap effect—shorter saccadic reaction times (SRTs) in Gap vs. Step trials. On average, stronger gap-period response across the entire neuronal population preceded shorter SRTs on trials with contralateral targets, although this correlation was stronger among the 15% ‘gap neurons’, which responded significantly during the gap. We also found 39% ‘target neurons’ with significant visual target-related responses, which were stronger in Gap trials and correlated with the SRTs better than the remaining cells. Compared with slow saccades, fast saccades were preceded by both stronger gap-related and target-related response in all PPC neurons, regardless of whether such response reached significance. Our findings suggest that the PPC in the marmoset contains an area that is involved in the modulation of saccadic preparation and plays roles comparable to those of area LIP in macaque monkeys in eye movements.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTAbnormal saccadic eye movements can serve as biomarkers for different neuropsychiatric disorders. So far, processes of cerebral cortical control of saccades are not fully understood. Non-human primates are ideal models for studying such processes, and the marmoset is especially advantageous since their smooth cortex permits laminar analyses of cortical microcircuits. Using electrode arrays implanted in the posterior parietal cortex of marmosets, we found neurons responsive to key periods of a saccadic task in a manner that contribute to cortical modulation of saccadic preparation. Notably, this signal was correlated with subsequent saccadic reaction times and was present in the entire neuronal population. We suggest that the marmoset model will shed new light on the cortical mechanisms of saccadic control.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document