SO2 Oxidation in Summertime Cloud Water at Whiteface Mountain

Author(s):  
Scott E. McLaren ◽  
John A. Kadlecek ◽  
Volker A. Mohnen
2020 ◽  
Vol 101 (10) ◽  
pp. E1820-E1841
Author(s):  
Sara Lance ◽  
Jie Zhang ◽  
James J. Schwab ◽  
Paul Casson ◽  
Richard E. Brandt ◽  
...  

AbstractAqueous chemical processing within cloud and fog water is thought to be a key process in the production and transformation of secondary organic aerosol mass, found abundantly and ubiquitously throughout the troposphere. Yet, significant uncertainty remains regarding the organic chemical reactions taking place within clouds and the conditions under which those reactions occur, owing to the wide variety of organic compounds and their evolution under highly variable conditions when cycled through clouds. Continuous observations from a fixed remote site like Whiteface Mountain (WFM) in New York State and other mountaintop sites have been used to unravel complex multiphase interactions in the past, particularly the conversion of gas-phase emissions of SO2 to sulfuric acid within cloud droplets in the presence of sunlight. These scientific insights led to successful control strategies that reduced aerosol sulfate and cloud water acidity substantially over the following decades. This paper provides an overview of observations obtained during a pilot study that took place at WFM in August 2017 aimed at obtaining a better understanding of Chemical Processing of Organic Compounds within Clouds (CPOC). During the CPOC pilot study, aerosol cloud activation efficiency, particle size distribution, and chemical composition measurements were obtained below-cloud for comparison to routine observations at WFM, including cloud water composition and reactive trace gases. Additional instruments deployed for the CPOC pilot study included a Doppler lidar, sun photometer, and radiosondes to assist in evaluating the meteorological context for the below-cloud and summit observations.


1985 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 323-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. A. Castillo ◽  
J. Kadlecek ◽  
S. McLaren

2011 ◽  
Vol 45 (37) ◽  
pp. 6669-6673 ◽  
Author(s):  
James E. Dukett ◽  
Nenad Aleksic ◽  
Nathan Houck ◽  
Philip Snyder ◽  
Paul Casson ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 841-854 ◽  
Author(s):  
James J. Schwab ◽  
Paul Casson ◽  
Richard Brandt ◽  
Liquat Husain ◽  
Vincent Dutkewicz ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
James S. Webber

INTRODUCTION“Acid rain” and “acid deposition” are terms no longer confined to the lexicon of atmospheric scientists and 1imnologists. Public awareness of and concern over this phenomenon, particularly as it affects acid-sensitive regions of North America, have increased dramatically in the last five years. Temperate ecosystems are suffering from decreased pH caused by acid deposition. Human health may be directly affected by respirable sulfates and by the increased solubility of toxic trace metals in acidified waters. Even man's monuments are deteriorating as airborne acids etch metal and stone features.Sulfates account for about two thirds of airborne acids with wet and dry deposition contributing equally to acids reaching surface waters or ground. The industrial Midwest is widely assumed to be the source of most sulfates reaching the acid-sensitive Northeast since S02 emitted as a byproduct of coal combustion in the Midwest dwarfs S02 emitted from all sources in the Northeast.


2014 ◽  
Vol 73 (13) ◽  
pp. 1141-1152
Author(s):  
Ye. N. Belov ◽  
B. A. Kabanov ◽  
Stanislav I. Khomenko ◽  
G. I. Khlopov ◽  
A. M. Linkova ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 46-57
Author(s):  
Mingyi Gu ◽  
Zhaomin Wang ◽  
Jianfen Wei ◽  
Xiaoyong Yu
Keyword(s):  

Tellus B ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Julika Zinke ◽  
Matthew E. Salter ◽  
Caroline Leck ◽  
Michael J. Lawler ◽  
Grace C. E. Porter ◽  
...  

1992 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 345-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.K. Miller ◽  
T.G. Huntington ◽  
A.H. Johnson ◽  
A.J. Friedland

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document