Large P ⊥ 2 Spin Dependence of p-p Elastic Scattering

Author(s):  
K. Abe
1986 ◽  
Vol 57 (15) ◽  
pp. 1855-1858 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Baum ◽  
M. Moede ◽  
W. Raith ◽  
U. Sillmen

2005 ◽  
Vol 146 ◽  
pp. 77-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Bravar ◽  
I. Alekseev ◽  
G. Bunce ◽  
S. Dhawan ◽  
R. Gill ◽  
...  

1970 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.C. Hafele ◽  
C.B. Fulmer ◽  
F.G. Kingston

1981 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Schwandt ◽  
A. D. Bacher ◽  
W. W. Jacobs ◽  
H.-O. Meyer ◽  
S. E. Vigdor

Spin 2004 ◽  
2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. BRAVAR ◽  
I. ALEKSEEV ◽  
G. BUNCE ◽  
S. DHAWAN ◽  
R. GILL ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
J. Langmore ◽  
M. Isaacson ◽  
J. Wall ◽  
A. V. Crewe

High resolution dark field microscopy is becoming an important tool for the investigation of unstained and specifically stained biological molecules. Of primary consideration to the microscopist is the interpretation of image Intensities and the effects of radiation damage to the specimen. Ignoring inelastic scattering, the image intensity is directly related to the collected elastic scattering cross section, σɳ, which is the product of the total elastic cross section, σ and the eficiency of the microscope system at imaging these electrons, η. The number of potentially bond damaging events resulting from the beam exposure required to reduce the effect of quantum noise in the image to a given level is proportional to 1/η. We wish to compare η in three dark field systems.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document