On the Value Dependent Role of the Identification Processing and Evaluation of Information in Risk/Benefit Analysis

1981 ◽  
pp. 245-262
Author(s):  
Andrew P. Sage ◽  
Elbert B. White
Keyword(s):  
Benefit Analysis ◽  
Risk Benefit Analysis

Hostile Takeovers and Anti-takeover Defenses in the Russian Corporate Market

2007 ◽  
pp. 70-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Demidova
Keyword(s):  
Cost Benefit Analysis ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Benefit Analysis ◽  
Costs And Benefits ◽  
Hostile Takeovers ◽  
Russian Market ◽  
Takeover Defenses ◽  
The Cost ◽  
European Markets

This article analyzes definitions and the role of hostile takeovers at the Russian and European markets for corporate control. It develops the methodology of assessing the efficiency of anti-takeover defenses adapted to the conditions of the Russian market. The paper uses the cost-benefit analysis, where the costs and benefits of the pre-bid and post-bid defenses are compared.

Rationalisation of non-sterile latex disposable gloves in clinical settings – a brief study using the purchase of expertise consultancy model

2003 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-19
Author(s):  
Duncanson V
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Care ◽  
Cost Benefit Analysis ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Clinical Nurse Specialist ◽  
Small Study ◽  
Clinical Settings ◽  
Nurse Specialist ◽  
Benefit Analysis ◽  
Clinical Nurse

T his article describes a small study aimed at making a purchasing recommendation to the purchasing manager, providing a cost-benefit analysis of the most commonly used brands of non-sterile latex examination gloves. One of the nine makes of glove tested remained consistent with the agreed criteria for assessment and, if introduced as the only option available, would result in a saving of $15,150 per annum on Site A of a recently merged secondary care Trust. Also, the importance of the consultancy role of the clinical nurse specialist in improving practice was demonstrated.

scholarly journals Cost risk benefit analysis to support chemoprophylaxis policy for travellers to malaria endemic countries

2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduardo Massad ◽  
Ben C Behrens ◽  
Francisco AB Coutinho ◽  
Ronald H Behrens
Keyword(s):  
Benefit Analysis ◽  
Risk Benefit Analysis ◽  
Cost Risk

scholarly journals A risk–benefit analysis approach to seafood intake to determine optimal consumption

2011 ◽  
Vol 107 (12) ◽  
pp. 1812-1822 ◽  
Author(s):  
Véronique Sirot ◽  
Jean-Charles Leblanc ◽  
Irène Margaritis
Keyword(s):  
Arsenic Exposure ◽  
Inorganic Arsenic ◽  
Hierarchical Cluster ◽  
Good Health ◽  
Benefit Analysis ◽  
Food Contaminants ◽  
Public Health Perspective ◽  
Contaminant Exposure ◽  
Consumption Level ◽  
Risk Benefit Analysis

Seafood provides n-3 long-chain PUFA (n-3 LC-PUFA), vitamins and minerals, which are essential to maintain good health. Moreover, seafood is a source of contaminants such as methylmercury, arsenic and persistent organic pollutants that may affect health. The aim of the present study was to determine in what quantities seafood consumption would provide nutritional benefits, while minimising the risks linked to food contaminants. Seafood was grouped into clusters using a hierarchical cluster analysis. Those nutrients and contaminants were selected for which it is known that seafood is a major source. The risk–benefit analysis consisted in using an optimisation model with constraints to calculate optimum seafood cluster consumption levels. The goal was to optimise nutrient intakes as well as to limit contaminant exposure with the condition being to attain recommended nutritional intakes without exceeding tolerable upper intakes for contaminants and nutrients, while taking into account background intakes. An optimum consumption level was calculated for adults that minimises inorganic arsenic exposure and increases vitamin D intake in the general population. This consumption level guarantees that the consumer reaches the recommended intake for n-3 LC-PUFA, Se and I, while remaining below the tolerable upper intakes for methylmercury, Cd, dioxins, polychlorobiphenyls, Zn, Ca and Cu. This consumption level, which is approximately 200 g/week of certain fatty fish species and approximately 50 g/week of lean fish, molluscs and crustaceans, has to be considered in order to determine food consumption recommendations in a public health perspective.

Risk–benefit analysis of adalimumab versus traditional non-biologic therapies for patients with Crohnʼs disease

2011 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 127-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward V. Loftus ◽  
Scott J. Johnson ◽  
Si-Tien Wang ◽  
Eric Wu ◽  
Parvez M. Mulani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Benefit Analysis ◽  
Biologic Therapies ◽  
Risk Benefit Analysis

Intravenous lidocaine: it's all about a risk‐benefit analysis

Anaesthesia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. W. Hollmann ◽  
H. Hermanns ◽  
P. Kranke ◽  
M. E. Durieux
Keyword(s):  
Benefit Analysis ◽  
Intravenous Lidocaine ◽  
Risk Benefit Analysis

scholarly journals Risk-benefit analysis in food safety and nutrition

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeanne Marie Membré ◽  
Sofia Santillana Farakos ◽  
Maarten Nauta
Keyword(s):  
Food Safety ◽  
Benefit Analysis ◽  
Risk Benefit Analysis
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document