Chronic Pelvic Pain: Pudendal Neuralgia and Therapeutic Neural Blockade

Author(s):  
Rupinder Singh ◽  
Edward T. Soriano ◽  
David A. Gordon
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (22;4) ◽  
pp. E333-E344
Author(s):  
Avneesh Chhabra

Background: Magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) has an increasing role in the diagnosis and management of pudendal neuralgia, a neurogenic cause of chronic pelvic pain. Objective: The objective of this research was to determine the role of MRN in predicting improved pain outcomes following computed tomography (CT)-guided perineural injections in patients with pudendal neuralgia. Study Design: This study used a retrospective cross-sectional study design. Setting: The research was conducted at a large academic hospital. Methods: Patients: Ninety-one patients (139 injections) who received MRN and CT-guided pudendal blocks were analyzed. Intervention: A 3Tesla (T) scanner was used to evaluate the lumbosacral plexus for pudendal neuropathy. Prior to receiving a CT-guided pudendal perineural injection, patients were given pain logs and asked to record pain on a visual analog scale. Measurement: MRN findings for pudendal neuropathy were compared to the results of the CTguided pudendal nerve blocks. Injection pain responses were categorized into 3 groups – positive block, possible positive block, and negative block. Statistical Tests: A chi-square test was used to test any association, and a Cochran-Armitage trend test was used to test any trend. Significance level was set at .05. All analyses were done in SAS Version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC). Results: Ninety-one patients (139 injections) who received MRN were analyzed. Of these 139 injections, 41 were considered positive (29.5%), 52 of 139 were possible positives (37.4%), and 46 of 139 were negative blocks (33.1%). Of the patients who had a positive pudendal block, no significant difference was found between the MRN result and the pudendal perineural injection response (P = .57). Women had better overall response to pudendal blocks, but this response was not associated with MRN findings (P = .34). However, positive MRN results were associated with better pain response in men (P = .005). Patients who reported bowel dysfunction also had a better response to pudendal perineural injection (P = .02). Limitations: Some limitations include subjectivity of pain reporting, reporting consistency, absence of a control group, and the retrospective nature of the chart review. Conclusion: Pudendal perineural injections improve pain in patients with pudendal neuralgia and positive MRN results are associated with better response in men. Key words: MRI, MRN, CT injection, pudendal neuralgia, pudendal nerve, pelvic pain, chronic pelvic pain, pudendal neuropathy


Pain Medicine ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 781-784 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rocco Salvatore Calabrò ◽  
Giuseppe Gervasi ◽  
Silvia Marino ◽  
Pasquale Natale Mondo ◽  
Placido Bramanti

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Castellanos ◽  
Louise P King

Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) in women is responsible for greater than 10% of referrals to gynecologists. A majority of them will remain undiagnosed or inadequately treated. Over time, CPP may lead to a syndrome that results in disability, loss of employment, and discord within relationships. This review discusses how to achieve a comprehensive assessment of CPP from a variety of causes. This review contains 13 figures, 5 tables and 60 references Key Words: dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, endometriosis, interstitial cystitis, irritable bowel syndrome, pelvic floor dysfunction, pelvic pain, pudendal neuralgia, somatic pain, visceral pain


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Castellanos ◽  
Louise P King

Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) in women is responsible for greater than 10% of referrals to gynecologists. A majority of them will remain undiagnosed or inadequately treated. Over time, CPP may lead to a syndrome that results in disability, loss of employment, and discord within relationships. This review discusses how to achieve a comprehensive assessment of CPP from a variety of causes. This review contains 12 figures, 2 tables and 57 references Key Words: dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, endometriosis, interstitial cystitis, irritable bowel syndrome, pelvic floor dysfunction, pelvic pain, pudendal neuralgia, somatic pain, visceral pain


2008 ◽  
Vol 2;11 (3;2) ◽  
pp. 215-224
Author(s):  
Philip W.H. Peng

Chronic pelvic pain can present in various pain syndromes. In particular, interventional procedure plays an important diagnostic and therapeutic role in 3 types of pelvic pain syndromes: pudendal neuralgia, piriformis syndrome, and “border nerve” syndrome (ilioinguinal, iliohypogastric, and genitofemoral nerve neuropathy). The objective of this review is to discuss the ultrasound-guided approach of the interventional procedures commonly used for these 3 specific chronic pelvic pain syndromes. Piriformis syndrome is an uncommon cause of buttock and leg pain. Some treatment options include the injection of the piriformis muscle with local anesthetic and steroids or the injection of botulinum toxin. Various techniques for piriformis muscle injection have been described. CT scan and EMG-guidance are not widely available to interventional physicians, while fluoroscopy exposes the performers to radiation risk. Ultrasound allows direct visualization and real-time injection of the piriformis muscle. Chronic neuropathic pain arising from the lesion or dysfunction of the ilioinguinal nerve, iliohypograstric nerve, and genitofemoral nerve can be diagnosed and treated by injection to the invloved nerves. However, the existing techniques are confusing and contradictory. Ultrasonography allows visualization of the nerves or the structures important in the identification of the nerves and provides the opportunities for real-time injections. Pudendal neuralgia commonly presents as chronic debilitating pain in the penis, scrotum, labia, perineum, or anorectal region. A pudendal nerve block is crucial for the diagnosis and treatment of pudendal neuralgia. The pudendal nerve is located between the sacrospinous and sacrotuberous ligaments at the level of ischial spine. Ultrasonography, but not the conventional fluoroscopy, allows visualization of the nerve and the surrounding landmark structures. Ultrasound-guided techniques offer many advantages over the conventional techniques. The ultrasound machine is portable and is more readily available to the pain specialist. It prevents patients and healthcare professionals from the exposure to radiation during the procedure. Because it allows the visualization of a wide variety of tissues, it potentially improves the accuracy of the needle placement, as exemplified by various interventional procedures in the pelvic regions aforementioned. Key words: Pudendal nerve, piriformis muscle, ilioinguinal nerve, iliohypogastric nerve, genitofemoral nerve, ultrasound


2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 33-34
Author(s):  
Daniel A. Shoskes ◽  
Chun-Te Lee ◽  
Donel Murphy ◽  
John C. Kefer ◽  
Hadley M. Wood

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 31-31
Author(s):  
J. Curtis Nickel ◽  
Dean Tripp ◽  
Shannon Chuai ◽  
Mark S. Litwin ◽  
Mary McNaughton-Collins

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document