Response Standardization for Drift Correction and Multivariate Calibration Transfer in “Electronic Tongue” Studies

Author(s):  
Vitaly Panchuk ◽  
Valentin Semenov ◽  
Larisa Lvova ◽  
Andrey Legin ◽  
Dmitry Kirsanov
2009 ◽  
Vol 642 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 27-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paman Gujral ◽  
Michael Amrhein ◽  
Dominique Bonvin

2016 ◽  
Vol 237 ◽  
pp. 962-968 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vitaly Panchuk ◽  
Larisa Lvova ◽  
Dmitry Kirsanov ◽  
Carla Guanais Gonçalves ◽  
Corrado Di Natale ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 56 (7) ◽  
pp. 877-886 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine M. Wehlburg ◽  
David M. Haaland ◽  
David K. Melgaard

A new prediction-augmented classical least-squares/partial least-squares (PACLS/PLS) hybrid algorithm is ideally suited for use in transferring multivariate calibrations between spectrometers. Spectral variations such as instrument response differences can be explicitly incorporated into the algorithm through the use of subset sample spectra collected on both spectrometers. Two current calibration transfer methods, subset recalibration and piecewise direct standardization (PDS), also utilize subset sample spectra to facilitate transfer of calibration. The three methods were applied to the transfer of quantitative multivariate calibration models for near-infrared (NIR) data of organic samples containing chlorobenzene, heptane, and toluene between a primary and three secondary spectrometers that were all the same model, called intra-vendor transfer of calibration. The hybrid PACLS/PLS method outperformed subset recalibration and provided predictions equivalent to PDS with additive background correction on the two secondary spectrometers whose instrument drift appeared to be dominated by simple linear baseline variations. One of the secondary spectrometers had complex instrument drift that was captured by repeatedly measuring the spectrum of a single repeat sample. In calculating a transfer function to correct prediction spectra, PDS assumes no instrumental drift on the secondary spectrometer. Therefore, PDS was unable to directly accommodate both the subset samples and the use of a single repeat sample to transfer and maintain a calibration on that secondary instrument. In order to implement the transfer of calibration with PDS in the presence of complex instrument drift, recalibrated PLS models that included the repeat spectra from the secondary spectrometer were used to predict the spectra transformed by PDS. The importance of correcting for drift on the secondary spectrometer during calibration transfer was illustrated by the improvements in prediction for all three methods vs. using only the instrument response differences derived from the subset sample spectra. When the effects of instrument drift were complex on the secondary spectrometer, the PACLS/PLS hybrid algorithm outperformed both PDS and subset recalibration. Through the explicit incorporation of spectral variations, due to instrument response differences and drift on the secondary spectrometer, the PACLS/PLS algorithm was successful at intra-vendor transfer of calibrations between NIR spectrometers.


2001 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 1348-1354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanne Holmin ◽  
Christina Krantz-Rülcker ◽  
Ingemar Lundström ◽  
Fredrik Winquist

2017 ◽  
Vol 246 ◽  
pp. 994-1000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Khaydukova ◽  
Cristina Medina-Plaza ◽  
Maria Luz Rodriguez-Mendez ◽  
Vitaly Panchuk ◽  
Dmitry Kirsanov ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 171 ◽  
pp. 234-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feiyu Zhang ◽  
Wanchao Chen ◽  
Ruoqiu Zhang ◽  
Boyang Ding ◽  
Heming Yao ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 127-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcelo N. Martins ◽  
Roberto K. H. Galvão ◽  
Maria Fernanda Pimentel

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document