AbstractIn recent history, reinforcement learning (RL) proved its capability by solving complex decision problems by mastering several games. Increased computational power and the advances in approximation with neural networks (NN) paved the path to RL’s successful applications. Even though RL can tackle more complex problems nowadays, it still relies on computational power and runtime. Quantum computing promises to solve these issues by its capability to encode information and the potential quadratic speedup in runtime. We compare tabular Q-learning and Q-learning using either a quantum or a classical approximation architecture on the frozen lake problem. Furthermore, the three algorithms are analyzed in terms of iterations until convergence to the optimal behavior, memory usage, and runtime. Within the paper, NNs are utilized for approximation in the classical domain, while in the quantum domain variational quantum circuits, as a quantum hybrid approximation method, have been used. Our simulations show that a quantum approximator is beneficial in terms of memory usage and provides a better sample complexity than NNs; however, it still lacks the computational speed to be competitive.
Tensor approach to software implementation of cellular automata model of diffusion