Multiple Criteria Evaluation of the Planned Bikesharing System in Jaworzno

2019 ◽  
pp. 93-103
Author(s):  
Andrzej Bąk ◽  
Katarzyna Nosal Hoy ◽  
Katarzyna Solecka
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Criteria ◽  
Multiple Criteria Evaluation

scholarly journals Rank disequilibrium in multiple-criteria evaluation schemes

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 165-180
Author(s):  
Jonathan K. Hodge ◽  
Faye Sprague-Williams ◽  
Jamie Woelk
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Criteria ◽  
Multiple Criteria Evaluation

Generative Matching Between Heterogeneous Meta-Model' Systems Based on Hybrid Heuristic

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 53-71
Author(s):  
Zouhair Ibn Batouta ◽  
Rachid Dehbi ◽  
Mohamed Talea ◽  
Hajoui Omar
Keyword(s):  
Computer Systems ◽  
Multiple Criteria ◽  
Model Systems ◽  
Hybrid Heuristic ◽  
Meta Model ◽  
Multiple Criteria Evaluation ◽  
Automatic Matching

Nowadays, designing and building computer systems has become increasingly difficult; this is essentially due to the great number of existing solutions. This article proposes a hybrid heuristic allowing the connection between meta-models of different systems, which will allow the generation between models conforming to these connected meta-models. First, this article presents the architecture of the generative matching approach named generative automatic matching (GAM), then is introduced an important part of this approach, a hybrid heuristic allowing the matching between the meta-models. Finally, the authors conclude by a multiple criteria evaluation of this approach.

scholarly journals Eliciting Weights of Significance of Criteria for a Monitoring Model of Performance of SMEs for Successful Insolvency Administrator’s Intervention

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (20) ◽  
pp. 5667 ◽  
Author(s):  
Podviezko ◽  
Kurschus ◽  
Lapinskiene
Keyword(s):  
Major Part ◽  
Prediction Models ◽  
Value Added ◽  
Bankruptcy Prediction ◽  
Multiple Criteria ◽  
Satisfactory Level ◽  
Monitoring Model ◽  
Multiple Criteria Evaluation ◽  
Evaluation And Monitoring ◽  
The Eu

Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are accounted for as a major part of the economy of the EU in terms of part of the population employed, turnover, value-added, etc. Causes of insolvency of SMEs can be different; they are categorized in the paper. A considerable shift from resolving cases of bankruptcy with the sole aim to satisfy creditors’ rights to augmenting and enhancing liquidation and reorganization procedures evolved interest of the authors in creating efficient bankruptcy prediction models and, in particular, methodologies for evaluation and monitoring of the performance of SMEs. In the paper, we reviewed several initiatives and instruments created by the EU for supporting SMEs. The paper laid a foundation for creating a more comprehensive methodology for evaluation of the state of a firm undergoing the process of reorganization. A hierarchy structure of criteria for the evaluation of SMEs was used in the paper; methodologies for eliciting weights of importance of criteria from experts and gauging the level of concordance of opinions of experts were applied. Resulting weights of criteria of performance of an insolvent SME were obtained; the importance of the managerial category of criteria was revealed. Prominent features of hierarchy structures and methodology of using the structure for calculating ultimate weights were described and demonstrated. Gauging concordance of opinions of experts revealed a satisfactory level of concordance of opinions of experts; this allowed to prepare the ultimate weights of criteria for multiple criteria evaluation of SMEs for further research.

MULTIPLE CRITERIA EVALUATION OF ASSEMBLING BUILDINGS FROM STEEL FRAME STRUCTURES

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruta Miniotaite
Keyword(s):  
Construction Materials ◽  
Steel Frame ◽  
Multiple Criteria ◽  
Multiple Criteria Analysis ◽  
Construction Workers ◽  
Design Solution ◽  
Frame Structures ◽  
Industrial Buildings ◽  
Steel Frame Structures ◽  
Multiple Criteria Evaluation

Steel frame structures are often used in the construction of public and industrial buildings. They are used for: all types of slope roofs; walls of newly-built public and industrial buildings; load bearing structures; roofs of renovated buildings. The process of assembling buildings from steel frame structures should be analysed as an integrated process influenced by such factors as construction materials and machinery used, the qualification level of construction workers, complexity of work, available finance. It is necessary to find a rational technological design solution for assembling buildings from steel frame structures by conducting a multiple criteria analysis. The analysis provides a possibility to evaluate the engineering considerations and find unequivocal solutions. The rational alternative of a complex process of assembling buildings from steel frame structures was found through multiple criteria analysis and multiple criteria evaluation. In multiple criteria evaluation of technological solutions for assembling buildings from steel frame structures by pairwise comparison method the criteria by significance are distributed as follows: durability is the most important criterion in the evaluation of alternatives; the price (EUR/unit of measurement) of a part of assembly process; construction workers’ qualification level (category); mechanization level of a part of assembling process (%), and complexity of assembling work (in points) are less important criteria.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document