Non-enhanced Transvaginal Ultrasonography

2020 ◽  
pp. 43-52
Author(s):  
Stefano Guerriero ◽  
Silvia Ajossa ◽  
Alba Piras ◽  
Eleonora Musa ◽  
Maria Angela Pascual ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transvaginal Ultrasonography

Transvaginal Ultrasonography and Saline Infusion Sonography Compared to Hysteroscopy for Diagnosis of Intracavity Lesion: A 4-Year Experience in Suburban Referral Hospital

2020 ◽  
Vol 103 (6) ◽  
pp. 585-593
Keyword(s):  
Predictive Value ◽  
Final Diagnosis ◽  
Saline Infusion ◽  
Transvaginal Ultrasonography ◽  
Histopathological Diagnosis ◽  
Endometrial Polyps ◽  
Saline Infusion Sonography ◽  
Submucous Myoma ◽  
Kappa Value ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of transvaginal ultrasonography (TVS) and saline infusion sonography (SIS) in use for the diagnosis of endometrial polyps and submucous myoma compared to hysteroscopy. Histopathology was considered as the gold standard for final diagnosis. Materials and Methods: The present retrospective study was conducted at Bhumibol Adulyadej Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand between January 2014 and December 2017. Medical records of 150 patients who attended for hysteroscopy and histopathological diagnosis were reviewed. The accuracy of TVS and SIS for the diagnosis of endometrial polyps and submucous myoma were determined. Results: Out of 150 enrolled cases, endometrial polyp was the most frequent hysteroscopic finding in participants of the present study (92/150). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of TVS, SIS, and hysteroscopy compared to pathologic reports for detection endometrial polyps were 71.7% versus 93.5% versus 97.8%, 38.5% versus 52.2% versus 68.2%, 80.5% versus 88.7% versus 92.8%, 27.8% versus 66.7% versus 88.2%, and 64.4% versus 85.2% versus 92.1%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of TVS, SIS, and hysteroscopy for detection of submucous myoma were 81.6% versus 92.1% versus 94.7%, 66.7% versus 86.9% versus 100%, 77.5% versus 92.1% versus 100%, 72.0% versus 86.9% versus 90.9%, and 75.4% versus 90.2% versus 96.6%, respectively. The kappa value from TVS, SIS, and hysteroscopy when the histopathologic reports were overall intrauterine abnormalities, endometrial polyps and submucous myoma were 0.45/0.43/0.72, 0.77/0.76/0.89, and 0.92/0.92/1.00, respectively. Conclusion: Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, accuracy, and kappa value of SIS for detecting endometrial polyps and submucous myoma were better than TVS. Keywords: Ultrasonography, Saline infusion sonography, Hysteroscopy, Accuracy

Transvaginal Ultrasonography Compared with Endometrial Biopsy for the Detection of Endometrial Disease

1997 ◽  
Vol 337 (25) ◽  
pp. 1792-1798 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert D. Langer ◽  
June J. Pierce ◽  
Katherine A. O'Hanlan ◽  
Susan R. Johnson ◽  
Mark A. Espeland ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Biopsy ◽  
Transvaginal Ultrasonography

Predicting pregnancy outcome by the observation of a gestational sac or of early fetal cardiac motion with transvaginal ultrasonography

1990 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 260-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory F. Rosen ◽  
Paul D. Silva ◽  
Pasquale Patrizio ◽  
Ricardo H. Asch ◽  
Bill Yee
Keyword(s):  
Pregnancy Outcome ◽  
Cardiac Motion ◽  
Transvaginal Ultrasonography ◽  
Gestational Sac

727: Transvaginal ultrasonography to predict preterm birth in women with uterine anomalies

2008 ◽  
Vol 199 (6) ◽  
pp. S207
Author(s):  
Joan Crane ◽  
Heather Scott ◽  
Wendy Whittle ◽  
Sujata Chandra ◽  
Donna Hutchens
Keyword(s):  
Preterm Birth ◽  
Transvaginal Ultrasonography ◽  
Uterine Anomalies

scholarly journals OP16.03: Reproducibility of different patterns of benign ovarian masses assessed by transvaginal ultrasonography evaluated by several operators with different degree of experience

2007 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 509-510
Author(s):  
S. Guerriero ◽  
J. L. Alcazar ◽  
M. A. Pascual ◽  
S. Ajossa ◽  
S. Floris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transvaginal Ultrasonography ◽  
Ovarian Masses
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document