Human Activity Recognition: Data Collection and Design Issues

Author(s):  
Md Atiqur Rahman Ahad ◽  
Anindya Das Antar ◽  
Masud Ahmed
Sensors ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (15) ◽  
pp. 3434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nattaya Mairittha ◽  
Tittaya Mairittha ◽  
Sozo Inoue

Labeling activity data is a central part of the design and evaluation of human activity recognition systems. The performance of the systems greatly depends on the quantity and “quality” of annotations; therefore, it is inevitable to rely on users and to keep them motivated to provide activity labels. While mobile and embedded devices are increasingly using deep learning models to infer user context, we propose to exploit on-device deep learning inference using a long short-term memory (LSTM)-based method to alleviate the labeling effort and ground truth data collection in activity recognition systems using smartphone sensors. The novel idea behind this is that estimated activities are used as feedback for motivating users to collect accurate activity labels. To enable us to perform evaluations, we conduct the experiments with two conditional methods. We compare the proposed method showing estimated activities using on-device deep learning inference with the traditional method showing sentences without estimated activities through smartphone notifications. By evaluating with the dataset gathered, the results show our proposed method has improvements in both data quality (i.e., the performance of a classification model) and data quantity (i.e., the number of data collected) that reflect our method could improve activity data collection, which can enhance human activity recognition systems. We discuss the results, limitations, challenges, and implications for on-device deep learning inference that support activity data collection. Also, we publish the preliminary dataset collected to the research community for activity recognition.


Sensors ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (23) ◽  
pp. 5206
Author(s):  
Enida Cero Dinarević ◽  
Jasmina Baraković Husić ◽  
Sabina Baraković

Human activity recognition (HAR) is a classification process that is used for recognizing human motions. A comprehensive review of currently considered approaches in each stage of HAR, as well as the influence of each HAR stage on energy consumption and latency is presented in this paper. It highlights various methods for the optimization of energy consumption and latency in each stage of HAR that has been used in literature and was analyzed in order to provide direction for the implementation of HAR in health and wellbeing applications. This paper analyses if and how each stage of the HAR process affects energy consumption and latency. It shows that data collection and filtering and data segmentation and classification stand out as key stages in achieving a balance between energy consumption and latency. Since latency is only critical for real-time HAR applications, the energy consumption of sensors and devices stands out as a key challenge for HAR implementation in health and wellbeing applications. Most of the approaches in overcoming challenges related to HAR implementation take place in the data collection, filtering and classification stages, while the data segmentation stage needs further exploration. Finally, this paper recommends a balance between energy consumption and latency for HAR in health and wellbeing applications, which takes into account the context and health of the target population.


Author(s):  
Wenqiang Chen ◽  
Shupei Lin ◽  
Elizabeth Thompson ◽  
John Stankovic

On-body sensor-based human activity recognition (HAR) lags behind other fields because it lacks large-scale, labeled datasets; this shortfall impedes progress in developing robust and generalized predictive models. To facilitate researchers in collecting more extensive datasets quickly and efficiently we developed SenseCollect. We did a survey and interviewed student researchers in this area to identify what barriers are making it difficult to collect on-body sensor-based HAR data from human subjects. Every interviewee identified data collection as the hardest part of their research, stating it was laborious, consuming and error-prone. To improve HAR data resources we need to address that barrier, but we need a better understanding of the complicating factors to overcome it. To that end we conducted a series of control variable experiments that tested several protocols to ascertain their impact on data collection. SenseCollect studied 240+ human subjects in total and presented the findings to develop a data collection guideline. We also implemented a system to collect data, created the two largest on-body sensor-based human activity datasets, and made them publicly available.


Author(s):  
Lidia Bajenaru ◽  
Ciprian Dobre ◽  
Radu-Ioan Ciobanu ◽  
Georgiana Dedu ◽  
Silviu-George Pantelimon ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document