Distributed Testing of Distance-k Colorings

2020 ◽  
pp. 275-290
Author(s):  
Pierre Fraigniaud ◽  
Magnús M. Halldórsson ◽  
Alexandre Nolin
Keyword(s):  
Distributed Testing

scholarly journals Oracles for Distributed Testing

2012 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 629-641 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert M. Hierons
Keyword(s):  
Distributed Testing

scholarly journals LCT: A Parallel Distributed Testing Tool for Multithreaded Java Programs

2013 ◽  
Vol 296 ◽  
pp. 253-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kari Kähkönen ◽  
Olli Saarikivi ◽  
Keijo Heljanko
Keyword(s):  
Distributed Testing ◽  
Testing Tool ◽  
Java Programs

Effects of Massed versus Distributed Practice of Test Taking on Achievement and Test Anxiety

1994 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. 915-919 ◽  
Author(s):  
John W. Zimmer ◽  
Dennis J. Hocevar
Keyword(s):  
Test Anxiety ◽  
Distributed Practice ◽  
Final Examination ◽  
Test Taking ◽  
Distributed Testing ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Initial Sessions ◽  
Final Examination Performance ◽  
Testing Condition ◽  
And Control

The effects of massed versus distributed practice on achievement and test anxiety were investigated using a quasi-experimental design employing 56 college students under two conditions. Test anxiety was assessed using Sarason's four-dimensional Reactions to Tests, while classroom achievement was measured on tests using multiple-choice applications. Experimental subjects were given four Reactions to Tests items and 10-item examinations on a weekly basis for 10 weeks, while control subjects had only a 100-item final examination. Analysis indicated (1) significantly higher final examination performance for the distributed testing condition; (2) a significant reduction in test anxiety between initial sessions and the remainder of the term in the distributed testing condition; (3) no difference in test anxiety between the distributed testing and control conditions when test anxiety was assessed at the end of the term; and (4) nonsignificant correlations between test anxiety dimensions of the Reactions to Tests and achievement in both the control and distributed testing conditions. Results support the contention that relationships between achievement and test anxiety may be more complex than previously thought.

Using Time to Add Order to Distributed Testing

2012 ◽  
pp. 232-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert M. Hierons ◽  
Mercedes G. Merayo ◽  
Manuel Núñez
Keyword(s):  
Distributed Testing

A Synchronized Test Control Execution Model of Distributed Systems

2021 ◽  
pp. 1377-1395
Author(s):  
Salma Azzouzi ◽  
Sara Hsaini ◽  
My El Hassan Charaf
Keyword(s):  
Test Cases ◽  
Agent Based ◽  
Parallel Testing ◽  
Test Execution ◽  
Support Interaction ◽  
Distributed Testing ◽  
Implementation Under Test ◽  
Execution Model ◽  
Local Test ◽  
Control And Synchronization

Conformance testing may be seen as mean to execute an IUT (implementation under test) by carrying out test cases in order to observe whether the behavior of the IUT is conforming to its specifications. However, the development of distributed testing frameworks is more complex and the implementation of the parallel testing components (PTCs) should take into consideration the mechanisms and functions required to support interaction during PTC communication. In this article, the authors present another way to control the test execution of PTCs by introducing synchronization messages into the local test sequences. Then, they suggest an agent-based simulation to implement synchronized local test sequences and resolve the problem of control and synchronization.

scholarly journals Distributed testing and estimation under sparse high dimensional models

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 1352-1382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather Battey ◽  
Jianqing Fan ◽  
Han Liu ◽  
Junwei Lu ◽  
Ziwei Zhu
Keyword(s):  
High Dimensional ◽  
Distributed Testing ◽  
Dimensional Models
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document