scholarly journals Nested Session Types

2021 ◽  
pp. 178-206
Author(s):  
Ankush Das ◽  
Henry DeYoung ◽  
Andreia Mordido ◽  
Frank Pfenning
Keyword(s):  
Programming Language ◽  
Message Passing ◽  
Communication Protocols ◽  
Type System ◽  
First Order ◽  
Session Types ◽  
Parametric Polymorphism ◽  
Trace Equivalence

AbstractSession types statically describe communication protocols between concurrent message-passing processes. Unfortunately, parametric polymorphism even in its restricted prenex form is not fully understood in the context of session types. In this paper, we present the metatheory of session types extended with prenex polymorphism and, as a result, nested recursive datatypes. Remarkably, we prove that type equality is decidable by exhibiting a reduction to trace equivalence of deterministic first-order grammars. Recognizing the high theoretical complexity of the latter, we also propose a novel type equality algorithm and prove its soundness. We observe that the algorithm is surprisingly efficient and, despite its incompleteness, sufficient for all our examples. We have implemented our ideas by extending the Rast programming language with nested session types. We conclude with several examples illustrating the expressivity of our enhanced type system.

A simple library implementation of binary sessions

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
Author(s):  
LUCA PADOVANI
Keyword(s):  
Programming Language ◽  
Protocol Analysis ◽  
Simple Approach ◽  
Type Inference ◽  
Hybrid Form ◽  
Type Checking ◽  
Session Types ◽  
Parametric Polymorphism ◽  
Session Type

AbstractInspired by the continuation-passing encoding of binary sessions, we describe a simple approach to embed a hybrid form of session type checking into any programming language that supports parametric polymorphism. The approach combines static protocol analysis with dynamic linearity checks. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the technique, we implement a well-integrated OCaml module for session communications. For free, OCaml provides us with equirecursive session types, parametric behavioural polymorphism, complete session type inference, and session subtyping.

Phantom types and subtyping

2006 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 751-791 ◽  
Author(s):  
MATTHEW FLUET ◽  
RICCARDO PUCELLA
Keyword(s):  
Type System ◽  
Type Systems ◽  
First Order ◽  
Standard Ml ◽  
Parametric Polymorphism ◽  
The One ◽  
Multiple Interface

We investigate a technique from the literature, called the phantom-types technique, that uses parametric polymorphism, type constraints, and unification of polymorphic types to model a subtyping hierarchy. Hindley-Milner type systems, such as the one found in Standard ML, can be used to enforce the subtyping relation, at least for first-order values. We show that this technique can be used to encode any finite subtyping hierarchy (including hierarchies arising from multiple interface inheritance). We formally demonstrate the suitability of the phantom-types technique for capturing first-order subtyping by exhibiting a type-preserving translation from a simple calculus with bounded polymorphism to a calculus embodying the type system of SML.

scholarly journals Fair Refinement for Asynchronous Session Types

2021 ◽  
pp. 144-163
Author(s):  
Mario Bravetti ◽  
Julien Lange ◽  
Gianluigi Zavattaro
Keyword(s):  
Message Passing ◽  
Contract Theory ◽  
Communication Protocols ◽  
General Notion ◽  
Service Contract ◽  
Session Types ◽  
Novel Variant

AbstractSession types are widely used as abstractions of asynchronous message passing systems. Refinement for such abstractions is crucial as it allows improvements of a given component without compromising its compatibility with the rest of the system. In the context of session types, the most general notion of refinement is the asynchronous session subtyping, which allows to anticipate message emissions but only under certain conditions. In particular, asynchronous session subtyping rules out candidates subtypes that occur naturally in communication protocols where, e.g., two parties simultaneously send each other a finite but unspecified amount of messages before removing them from their respective buffers. To address this shortcoming, we study fair compliance over asynchronous session types and fair refinement as the relation that preserves it. This allows us to propose a novel variant of session subtyping that leverages the notion of controllability from service contract theory and that is a sound characterisation of fair refinement. In addition, we show that both fair refinement and our novel subtyping are undecidable. We also present a sound algorithm, and its implementation, which deals with examples that feature potentially unbounded buffering.

scholarly journals Session Coalgebras: A Coalgebraic View on Session Types and Communication Protocols

2021 ◽  
pp. 375-403
Author(s):  
Alex C. Keizer ◽  
Henning Basold ◽  
Jorge A. Pérez
Keyword(s):  
Communication Protocols ◽  
Type System ◽  
Type Systems ◽  
Software Systems ◽  
Compositional Techniques ◽  
Behavioural Type ◽  
Session Types ◽  
Session Type ◽  
Coalgebra Structure ◽  
Large Systems

AbstractCompositional methods are central to the development and verification of software systems. They allow breaking down large systems into smaller components, while enabling reasoning about the behaviour of the composed system. For concurrent and communicating systems, compositional techniques based on behavioural type systems have received much attention. By abstracting communication protocols as types, these type systems can statically check that programs interact with channels according to a certain protocol, whether the intended messages are exchanged in a certain order. In this paper, we put on our coalgebraic spectacles to investigate session types, a widely studied class of behavioural type systems. We provide a syntax-free description of session-based concurrency as states of coalgebras. As a result, we rediscover type equivalence, duality, and subtyping relations in terms of canonical coinductive presentations. In turn, this coinductive presentation makes it possible to elegantly derive a decidable type system with subtyping for $$\pi $$ π -calculus processes, in which the states of a coalgebra will serve as channel protocols. Going full circle, we exhibit a coalgebra structure on an existing session type system, and show that the relations and type system resulting from our coalgebraic perspective agree with the existing ones.

scholarly journals Mixed Sessions

2020 ◽  
pp. 715-742
Author(s):  
Vasco T. Vasconcelos ◽  
Filipe Casal ◽  
Bernardo Almeida ◽  
Andreia Mordido
Keyword(s):  
Program Development ◽  
Message Passing ◽  
Type System ◽  
The Other ◽  
Runtime System ◽  
Type Checking ◽  
Session Types ◽  
Patterns Of Interaction

AbstractSession types describe patterns of interaction on communicating channels. Traditional session types include a form of choice whereby servers offer a collection of options, of which each client picks exactly one. This sort of choice constitutes a particular case of separated choice: offering on one side, selecting on the other. We introduce mixed choices in the context of session types and argue that they increase the flexibility of program development at the same time that they reduce the number of synchronisation primitives to exactly one. We present a type system incorporating subtyping and prove preservation and absence of runtime errors for well-typed processes. We further show that classical (conventional) sessions can be faithfully and tightly embedded in mixed choices. Finally, we discuss algorithmic type checking and a runtime system built on top of a conventional (choice-less) message-passing architecture.

Causal-Consistent Replay Reversible Semantics for Message Passing Concurrent Programs

2021 ◽  
Vol 178 (3) ◽  
pp. 229-266
Author(s):  
Ivan Lanese ◽  
Adrián Palacios ◽  
Germán Vidal
Keyword(s):  
Programming Language ◽  
Message Passing ◽  
Concurrent Programming ◽  
Concurrent Systems ◽  
Concurrent Programs ◽  
Unified Framework ◽  
Innovative Technique ◽  
Dual Notion

Causal-consistent reversible debugging is an innovative technique for debugging concurrent systems. It allows one to go back in the execution focusing on the actions that most likely caused a visible misbehavior. When such an action is selected, the debugger undoes it, including all and only its consequences. This operation is called a causal-consistent rollback. In this way, the user can avoid being distracted by the actions of other, unrelated processes. In this work, we introduce its dual notion: causal-consistent replay. We allow the user to record an execution of a running program and, in contrast to traditional replay debuggers, to reproduce a visible misbehavior inside the debugger including all and only its causes. Furthermore, we present a unified framework that combines both causal-consistent replay and causal-consistent rollback. Although most of the ideas that we present are rather general, we focus on a popular functional and concurrent programming language based on message passing: Erlang.

Some logical and syntactical observations concerning the first-order dependent type system λP

1999 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 335-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
HERMAN GEUVERS ◽  
ERIK BARENDSEN
Keyword(s):  
Predicate Logic ◽  
Type System ◽  
Logical Framework ◽  
First Order ◽  
Logical Derivation ◽  
Dependent Type ◽  
First Order Predicate Logic

We look at two different ways of interpreting logic in the dependent type system λP. The first is by a direct formulas-as-types interpretation à la Howard where the logical derivation rules are mapped to derivation rules in the type system. The second is by viewing λP as a Logical Framework, following Harper et al. (1987) and Harper et al. (1993). The type system is then used as the meta-language in which various logics can be coded.We give a (brief) overview of known (syntactical) results about λP. Then we discuss two issues in some more detail. The first is the completeness of the formulas-as-types embedding of minimal first-order predicate logic into λP. This is a remarkably complicated issue, a first proof of which appeared in Geuvers (1993), following ideas in Barendsen and Geuvers (1989) and Swaen (1989). The second issue is the minimality of λP as a logical framework. We will show that some of the rules are actually superfluous (even though they contribute nicely to the generality of the presentation of λP).At the same time we will attempt to provide a gentle introduction to λP and its various aspects and we will try to use little inside knowledge.

Parallel Nonnegative Matrix Factorization via Newton Iteration

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (03) ◽  
pp. 1650014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Flatz ◽  
Marián Vajteršic
Keyword(s):  
Shared Memory ◽  
Matrix Factorization ◽  
Message Passing ◽  
Nonnegative Matrix Factorization ◽  
Nonnegative Matrix ◽  
Newton Iteration ◽  
Parallel Execution ◽  
Kkt Conditions ◽  
Nonnegative Matrices ◽  
First Order

The goal of Nonnegative Matrix Factorization (NMF) is to represent a large nonnegative matrix in an approximate way as a product of two significantly smaller nonnegative matrices. This paper shows in detail how an NMF algorithm based on Newton iteration can be derived using the general Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) conditions for first-order optimality. This algorithm is suited for parallel execution on systems with shared memory and also with message passing. Both versions were implemented and tested, delivering satisfactory speedup results.

scholarly journals SMT-Based System Verification with DVF

10.29007/59rn ◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amit Goel ◽  
Sava Krstic ◽  
Rebekah Leslie ◽  
Mark Tuttle
Keyword(s):  
Thin Layer ◽  
Type System ◽  
Transition Systems ◽  
First Order ◽  
Verification Conditions ◽  
Logic Verification ◽  
System Verification ◽  
Selected Subset ◽  
Parametric Specification

We introduce the <i>Deductive Verificaton Framework</i> (DVF), a language and a tool for verifying properties of transition systems. The language is procedural and the system transitions are a selected subset of procedures. The type system and built-in operations are consistent with SMT-LIB, as are the multisorted first-order logical formulas that may occur in DVF programs as pre- and post-conditions, assumptions, assertions, and goals. A template mechanism allows parametric specification of complex types within the confines of this logic. Verification conditions are generated from specified goals and passed to SMT engine(s). A general assume-guarantee scheme supports a thin layer of interactive proving.

scholarly journals Automating Proof Steps of Progress Proofs: Comparing Vampire and Dafny

10.29007/5zjp ◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvia Grewe ◽  
Sebastian Erdweg ◽  
Mira Mezini
Keyword(s):  
Formal Methods ◽  
Programming Language ◽  
Type System ◽  
Type Systems ◽  
Domain Specific Languages ◽  
Smt Solver ◽  
Domain Specific ◽  
Efficient Type

\noindent Developing provably sound type systems is a non-trivial task which, as of today, typically requires expert skills in formal methods and a considerable amount of time. Our Veritas~\cite{GreweErdwegWittmannMezini15} project aims at providing support for the development of soundness proofs of type systems and efficient type checker implementations from specifications of type systems. To this end, we investigate how to best automate typical steps within type soundness proofs.\noindent In this paper, we focus on progress proofs for type systems of domain-specific languages. As a running example for such a type system, we model a subset SQL and augment it with a type system. We compare two different approaches for automating proof steps of the progress proofs for this type system against each other: firstly, our own tool Veritas, which translates proof goals and specifications automatically to TPTP~\cite{Sutcliffe98} and calls Vampire~\cite{KovacsV13} on them, and secondly, the programming language Dafny~\cite{Leino2010}, which translates proof goals and specifications to the intermediate verification language Boogie 2~\cite{Leino2008} and calls the SMT solver Z3~\cite{DeMoura2008} on them. We find that Vampire and Dafny are equally well-suited for automatically proving simple steps within progress proofs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document