Phantom types and subtyping

2006 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 751-791 ◽  
Author(s):  
MATTHEW FLUET ◽  
RICCARDO PUCELLA
Keyword(s):  
Type System ◽  
Type Systems ◽  
First Order ◽  
Standard Ml ◽  
Parametric Polymorphism ◽  
The One ◽  
Multiple Interface

We investigate a technique from the literature, called the phantom-types technique, that uses parametric polymorphism, type constraints, and unification of polymorphic types to model a subtyping hierarchy. Hindley-Milner type systems, such as the one found in Standard ML, can be used to enforce the subtyping relation, at least for first-order values. We show that this technique can be used to encode any finite subtyping hierarchy (including hierarchies arising from multiple interface inheritance). We formally demonstrate the suitability of the phantom-types technique for capturing first-order subtyping by exhibiting a type-preserving translation from a simple calculus with bounded polymorphism to a calculus embodying the type system of SML.

Weak polymorphism can be sound

1996 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Greiner
Keyword(s):  
New Jersey ◽  
Type System ◽  
Type Systems ◽  
Type Inference ◽  
Inference Algorithm ◽  
Standard Ml ◽  
Polymorphic Type

AbstractThe weak polymorphic type system of Standard ML of New Jersey (SML/NJ) (MacQueen, 1992) has only been presented as part of the implementation of the SML/NJ compiler, not as a formal type system. As a result, it is not well understood. And while numerous versions of the implementation have been shown unsound, the concept has not been proved sound or unsound. We present an explanation of weak polymorphism and show that a formalization of this is sound. We also relate this to the SML/NJ implementation of weak polymorphism through a series of type systems that incorporate elements of the SML/NJ type inference algorithm.

scholarly journals Using Vampire with Support for Algebraic Datatypes in Type Soundness Proofs

10.29007/pmmz ◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvia Grewe ◽  
André Pacak ◽  
Mira Mezini
Keyword(s):  
Type System ◽  
Type Systems ◽  
First Order ◽  
Domain Specific ◽  
The Past ◽  
Finite Term ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Input Format ◽  
Ongoing Project ◽  
Superposition Calculus

In our ongoing project VeriTaS, we aim at automating soundness proofs for type sys- tems of domain-specific languages. In the past, we successfully used previous Vampire versions for automatically discharging many intermediate proof obligations arising within standard soundness proofs for small type systems. With older Vampire versions, encoding the individual proof problems required manual encoding of algebraic datatypes via the theory of finite term algebras. One of the new Vampire versions now supports the direct specification of algebraic datatypes and integrates reasoning about term algebras into the internally used superposition calculus.In this work, we investigate how many proof problems that typically arise within type soundness proofs different Vampire 4.1 versions can prove. Our test set consists of proof problems from a progress proof of a type system for a subset of SQL. We compare running Vampire 4.1 with our own encodings of algebraic datatypes (in untyped as well as in typed first-order logic) to running Vampire 4.1 with support for algebraic datatypes, which uses SMTLIB as input format. We observe that with our own encodings, Vampire 4.1 still proves more of our input problems. We discuss the differences between our own encoding of algebraic datatypes and the ones used within Vampire 4.1 with support for algebraic datatypes.

scholarly journals On the Versatility of Open Logical Relations

2020 ◽  
pp. 56-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilles Barthe ◽  
Raphaëlle Crubillé ◽  
Ugo Dal Lago ◽  
Francesco Gavazzo
Keyword(s):  
Programming Languages ◽  
Automatic Differentiation ◽  
Type System ◽  
Order Type ◽  
Higher Order ◽  
Base Case ◽  
Logical Relation ◽  
First Order ◽  
Differentiable Functions ◽  
The One

AbstractLogical relations are one among the most powerful techniques in the theory of programming languages, and have been used extensively for proving properties of a variety of higher-order calculi. However, there are properties that cannot be immediately proved by means of logical relations, for instance program continuity and differentiability in higher-order languages extended with real-valued functions. Informally, the problem stems from the fact that these properties are naturally expressed on terms of non-ground type (or, equivalently, on open terms of base type), and there is no apparent good definition for a base case (i.e. for closed terms of ground types). To overcome this issue, we study a generalization of the concept of a logical relation, called open logical relation, and prove that it can be fruitfully applied in several contexts in which the property of interest is about expressions of first-order type. Our setting is a simply-typed $$\lambda $$ λ -calculus enriched with real numbers and real-valued first-order functions from a given set, such as the one of continuous or differentiable functions. We first prove a containment theorem stating that for any collection of real-valued first-order functions including projection functions and closed under function composition, any well-typed term of first-order type denotes a function belonging to that collection. Then, we show by way of open logical relations the correctness of the core of a recently published algorithm for forward automatic differentiation. Finally, we define a refinement-based type system for local continuity in an extension of our calculus with conditionals, and prove the soundness of the type system using open logical relations.

scholarly journals Elaborating intersection and union types

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 133-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
JOSHUA DUNFIELD
Keyword(s):  
Programming Languages ◽  
Type System ◽  
Type Systems ◽  
Prototype Implementation ◽  
Value Evaluation ◽  
Source Program ◽  
Parametric Polymorphism ◽  
New Type ◽  
Dynamic Typing ◽  
System Feature

AbstractDesigning and implementing typed programming languages is hard. Every new type system feature requires extending the metatheory and implementation, which are often complicated and fragile. To ease this process, we would like to provide general mechanisms that subsume many different features. In modern type systems, parametric polymorphism is fundamental, but intersection polymorphism has gained little traction in programming languages. Most practical intersection type systems have supported onlyrefinement intersections, which increase the expressiveness of types (more precise properties can be checked) without altering the expressiveness of terms; refinement intersections can simply be erased during compilation. In contrast,unrestrictedintersections increase the expressiveness of terms, and can be used to encode diverse language features, promising an economy of both theory and implementation. We describe a foundation for compiling unrestricted intersection and union types: an elaboration type system that generates ordinary λ-calculus terms. The key feature is a Forsythe-like merge construct. With this construct, not all reductions of the source program preserve types; however, we prove that ordinary call-by-value evaluation of the elaborated program corresponds to a type-preserving evaluation of the source program. We also describe a prototype implementation and applications of unrestricted intersections and unions: records, operator overloading, and simulating dynamic typing.

scholarly journals Nested Session Types

2021 ◽  
pp. 178-206
Author(s):  
Ankush Das ◽  
Henry DeYoung ◽  
Andreia Mordido ◽  
Frank Pfenning
Keyword(s):  
Programming Language ◽  
Message Passing ◽  
Communication Protocols ◽  
Type System ◽  
First Order ◽  
Session Types ◽  
Parametric Polymorphism ◽  
Trace Equivalence

AbstractSession types statically describe communication protocols between concurrent message-passing processes. Unfortunately, parametric polymorphism even in its restricted prenex form is not fully understood in the context of session types. In this paper, we present the metatheory of session types extended with prenex polymorphism and, as a result, nested recursive datatypes. Remarkably, we prove that type equality is decidable by exhibiting a reduction to trace equivalence of deterministic first-order grammars. Recognizing the high theoretical complexity of the latter, we also propose a novel type equality algorithm and prove its soundness. We observe that the algorithm is surprisingly efficient and, despite its incompleteness, sufficient for all our examples. We have implemented our ideas by extending the Rast programming language with nested session types. We conclude with several examples illustrating the expressivity of our enhanced type system.

scholarly journals Using Vampire in Soundness Proofs of Type Systems

10.29007/22x6 ◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvia Grewe ◽  
Sebastian Erdweg ◽  
Mira Mezini
Keyword(s):  
Programming Languages ◽  
Type System ◽  
Lambda Calculus ◽  
Type Systems ◽  
Current Approach ◽  
Order Logic ◽  
First Order Logic ◽  
First Order ◽  
Domain Specific ◽  
Automated Proof

Type systems for programming languages shall detect type errors in programs before runtime. To ensure that a type system meets this requirement, its soundness must be formally verified. We aim at automating soundness proofs of type systems to facilitate the development of sound type systems for domain-specific languages.Soundness proofs for type systems typically require induction. However, many of the proofs of individual induction cases only require first-order reasoning. For the development of our workbench Veritas, we build on this observation by combining automated first-order theorem provers such as Vampire with automated proof strategies specific to type systems. In this paper, we describe how we encode type soundness proofs in first-order logic using TPTP. We show how we use Vampire to prove the soundness of type systems for the simply-typed lambda calculus and for parts of a typed SQL. We report on which parts of the proofs are handled well by Vampire, and what parts work less well with our current approach.

scholarly journals Annotated Type Systems for Program Analysis

1995 ◽  
Vol 24 (498) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirsten Lackner Solberg
Keyword(s):  
Program Analysis ◽  
Abstract Interpretation ◽  
Operational Semantics ◽  
Type System ◽  
Denotational Semantics ◽  
Type Systems ◽  
Strictness Analysis ◽  
Binding Time ◽  
The One ◽  
Treat All

<p>In this Ph.D. thesis, we study four program analyses. Three of them are specified by annotated type systems and the last one by abstract interpretation.</p><p>We present a combined strictness and totality analysis. We are specifying the analysis as an annotated type system. The type system allows conjunctions of annotated types, but only at the top-level. The analysis is somewhat more powerful than the strictness analysis by Kuo and Mishra due to the conjunctions and in that we also consider totality. The analysis is shown sound with respect to a natural-style operational semantics. The analysis is not immediately extendable to full conjunction.</p><p>The second analysis is also a combined strictness and totality analysis, however with ``full´´ conjunction. Soundness of the analysis is shown with respect to a denotational semantics. The analysis is more powerful than the strictness analyses by Jensen and Benton in that it in addition to strictness considers totality. So far we have only specified the analyses, however in order for the analyses to be practically useful we need an algorithm for inferring the annotated types. We construct an algorithm for the second analysis using the lazy type approach by Hankin and Le Métayer. The reason for choosing the second analysis from the thesis is that the approach is not applicable to the first analysis.</p><p>The third analysis we study is a binding time analysis. We take the analysis specified by Nielson and Nielson and we construct a more efficient algorithm than the one proposed by Nielson and Nielson. The algorithm collects constraints in a structural manner like the type inference algorithm by Damas. Afterwards the minimal solution to the set of constraints is found.</p><p>The last analysis in the thesis is specified by abstract interpretation. Hunt shows that projection based analyses are subsumed by PER (partial equivalence relation) based analyses using abstract interpretation. The PERs used by Hunt are strict, i.e. bottom is related to bottom. Here we lift this restriction by requiring the PERs to be uniform, in the sense that they treat all the integers equally. By allowing non-strict PERs we get three properties on the integers, corresponding to the three annotations used in the first and second analysis in the thesis.</p>

ON THE CONSERVATIVITY OF LEIBNIZ EQUALITY

1998 ◽  
Vol 09 (04) ◽  
pp. 431-454
Author(s):  
M. P. A. SELLINK
Keyword(s):  
Type System ◽  
Type Systems ◽  
Order Theory ◽  
Second Order ◽  
First Order ◽  
Pure Type ◽  
First Order Theory ◽  
Pure Type Systems ◽  
Leibniz Equality

We embed a first order theory with equality in the Pure Type System λMON2 that is a subsystem of the well-known type system λPRED2. The embedding is based on the Curry-Howard isomorphism, i.e. → and ∀ coincide with → and Π. Formulas of the form [Formula: see text] are treated as Leibniz equalities. That is, [Formula: see text] is identified with the second order formula ∀ P. P(t1)→ P(t2), which contains only →'s and ∀'s and can hence be embedded straightforwardly. We give a syntactic proof — based on enriching typed λ-calculus with extra reduction steps — for the equivalence between derivability in the logic and inhabitance in λMNO2. Familiarity with Pure Type Systems is assumed.

scholarly journals Higher Dimensional Holonomy Map for Rules Submanifolds in Graded Manifolds

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-91
Author(s):  
Gianmarco Giovannardi
Keyword(s):  
Characteristic Direction ◽  
Fixed Degree ◽  
One Dimensional ◽  
First Order ◽  
Natural Choice ◽  
Higher Dimensional ◽  
Graded Manifold ◽  
The One ◽  
Graded Manifolds ◽  
Holonomy Map

AbstractThe deformability condition for submanifolds of fixed degree immersed in a graded manifold can be expressed as a system of first order PDEs. In the particular but important case of ruled submanifolds, we introduce a natural choice of coordinates, which allows to deeply simplify the formal expression of the system, and to reduce it to a system of ODEs along a characteristic direction. We introduce a notion of higher dimensional holonomy map in analogy with the one-dimensional case [29], and we provide a characterization for singularities as well as a deformability criterion.

Relational Chase Procedures Interpreted as Resolution with Paramodulation1

1991 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 123-138
Author(s):  
Joachim Biskup ◽  
Bernhard Convent
Keyword(s):  
Alternative Interpretation ◽  
Order Logic ◽  
First Order Logic ◽  
Inference Problem ◽  
First Order ◽  
Inference Problems ◽  
The One ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Theoretical Foundations ◽  
Insight Into

In this paper the relationship between dependency theory and first-order logic is explored in order to show how relational chase procedures (i.e., algorithms to decide inference problems for dependencies) can be interpreted as clever implementations of well known refutation procedures of first-order logic with resolution and paramodulation. On the one hand this alternative interpretation provides a deeper insight into the theoretical foundations of chase procedures, whereas on the other hand it makes available an already well established theory with a great amount of known results and techniques to be used for further investigations of the inference problem for dependencies. Our presentation is a detailed and careful elaboration of an idea formerly outlined by Grant and Jacobs which up to now seems to be disregarded by the database community although it definitely deserves more attention.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document