scholarly journals Pfaffian Pairs and Parities: Counting on Linear Matroid Intersection and Parity Problems

Author(s):  
Kazuki Matoya ◽  
Taihei Oki
Keyword(s):  
2015 ◽  
Vol 07 (02) ◽  
pp. 1550019
Author(s):  
Jinyu Huang

A maximum linear matroid parity set is called a basic matroid parity set, if its size is the rank of the matroid. We show that determining the existence of a common base (basic matroid parity set) for linear matroid intersection (linear matroid parity) is in NC2, provided that there are polynomial number of common bases (basic matroid parity sets). For graphic matroids, we show that finding a common base for matroid intersection is in NC2, if the number of common bases is polynomial bounded. To our knowledge, these algorithms are the first deterministic NC algorithms for matroid intersection and matroid parity. We also give a new RNC2 algorithm that finds a common base for graphic matroid intersection. We prove that if there is a black-box NC algorithm for Polynomial Identity Testing (PIT), then there is an NC algorithm to determine the existence of a common base (basic matroid parity set) for linear matroid intersection (linear matroid parity).


2020 ◽  
Vol 183 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 397-418
Author(s):  
André Linhares ◽  
Neil Olver ◽  
Chaitanya Swamy ◽  
Rico Zenklusen

Algorithmica ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Leonardi ◽  
Gianpiero Monaco ◽  
Piotr Sankowski ◽  
Qiang Zhang

AbstractMotivated by many practical applications, in this paper we study budget feasible mechanisms with the goal of procuring an independent set of a matroid. More specifically, we are given a matroid $${\mathcal {M}}=(E,{\mathcal {I}})$$ M = ( E , I ) . Each element of the ground set E is controlled by a selfish agent and the cost of the element is private information of the agent itself. A budget limited buyer has additive valuations over the elements of E. The goal is to design an incentive compatible budget feasible mechanism which procures an independent set of the matroid of largest possible value. We also consider the more general case of the pair $${\mathcal {M}}=(E,{\mathcal {I}})$$ M = ( E , I ) satisfying only the hereditary property. This includes matroids as well as matroid intersection. We show that, given a polynomial time deterministic algorithm that returns an $$\alpha $$ α -approximation to the problem of finding a maximum-value independent set in $${\mathcal {M}}$$ M , there exists an individually rational, truthful and budget feasible mechanism which is $$(3\alpha +1)$$ ( 3 α + 1 ) -approximated and runs in polynomial time, thus yielding also a 4-approximation for the special case of matroids.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 85-99
Author(s):  
Munqath Alattar ◽  
Attila Sali

Abstract Missing data value is an extensive problem in both research and industrial developers. Two general approaches are there to deal with the problem of missing values in databases; they could be either ignored (removed) or imputed (filled in) with new values (Farhangfar et al. in IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern-Part A: Syst Hum 37(5):692–709, 2007). For some SQL tables, it is possible that some candidate key of the table is not null-free and this needs to be handled. Possible keys and certain keys to deal with this situation were introduced in Köhler et al. (VLDB J 25(4):571–596, 2016). In the present paper, we introduce an intermediate concept called strongly possible keys that is based on a data mining approach using only information already contained in the SQL table. A strongly possible key is a key that holds for some possible world which is obtained by replacing any occurrences of nulls with some values already appearing in the corresponding attributes. Implication among strongly possible keys is characterized, and Armstrong tables are constructed. An algorithm to verify a strongly possible key is given applying bipartite matching. Connection between matroid intersection problem and system of strongly possible keys is established. For the cases when no strongly possible keys hold, an approximation notion is introduced to calculate the closeness of any given set of attributes to be considered as a strongly possible key using the $$g_3$$ g 3 measure, and we derive its component version $$g_4$$ g 4 . Analytical comparisons are given between the two measures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document