Evaluate the Effect of Age and Driving Experience on Driving Performance with Automated Vehicles

Author(s):  
Tianjian Li ◽  
Ruobing Zhao ◽  
Yi Liu ◽  
Yueqing Li ◽  
Guanlong Li
2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisandra Garay ◽  
Donald L. Fisher ◽  
Kathleen L. Hancock

Author(s):  
James W.H. Brown ◽  
Kirsten M. A. Revell ◽  
Joy Richardson ◽  
Ioannis Politis ◽  
Patrick Langdon ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Dengbo He ◽  
Birsen Donmez

State-of-the-art vehicle automation requires drivers to visually monitor the driving environment and the automation (through interfaces and vehicle’s actions) and intervene when necessary. However, as evidenced by recent automated vehicle crashes and laboratory studies, drivers are not always able to step in when the automation fails. Research points to the increase in distraction or secondary-task engagement in the presence of automation as a potential reason. However, previous research on secondary-task engagement in automated vehicles mainly focused on experienced drivers. This issue may be amplified for novice drivers with less driving skill. In this paper, we compared secondary-task engagement behaviors of novice and experienced drivers both in manual (non-automated) and automated driving settings in a driving simulator. A self-paced visual-manual secondary task presented on an in-vehicle display was utilized. Phase 1 of the study included 32 drivers (16 novice) who drove the simulator manually. In Phase 2, another set of 32 drivers (16 novice) drove with SAE-level-2 automation. In manual driving, there were no differences between novice and experienced drivers’ rate of manual interactions with the secondary task (i.e., taps on the display). However, with automation, novice drivers had a higher manual interaction rate with the task than experienced drivers. Further, experienced drivers had shorter average glance durations toward the task than novice drivers in general, but the difference was larger with automation compared with manual driving. It appears that with automation, experienced drivers are more conservative in their secondary-task engagement behaviors compared with novice drivers.


1999 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 331-346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael G. Lenne ◽  
Thomas J. Triggs ◽  
Jennifer R. Redman

2011 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 355-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larry B. Nabatilan ◽  
Fereydoun Aghazadeh ◽  
Ashish D. Nimbarte ◽  
Craig C. Harvey ◽  
Suman K. Chowdhury

2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 1037-1044
Author(s):  
Abhijit Khadatkar ◽  
CR Mehta

Tractor noise is critical occupational hazard which is the major cause of hearing impairment among Indian agricultural farm workers. The study aimed to show the effect of age and driving exposure on hearing impairment of drivers. Ninety healthy male subjects of similar age, height, and weight were selected and divided into four groups, i.e. 21–30, 31–40, 41–50, and 51–60 years. The audiometric testing was conducted of both the ears at 10 different frequencies, i.e. 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 kHz. The hearing threshold levels of office workers at audiometric test frequencies did not exceed 25 dB(A) to cause hearing handicap. However, it exceeded 25 dB(A) for tractor drivers and was higher for higher age group tractor drivers. Whereas, it did not exceeded 25 dB(A) at the audiometric test frequencies for the office workers except at 51–60 years of age group. Also, with the increase in age group and increase of driving experience, the mean hearing threshold levels of tractor drivers increase. It was concluded that the occupational hazards of tractor driving significantly increased the hearing threshold levels and the risk is even higher for the tractor drivers with ≥15 years of driving experience. Also, the mean hearing threshold levels for tractor drivers increase with increase in driving experience.


2018 ◽  
Vol 231 ◽  
pp. 04003
Author(s):  
Kamila Gąsiorek ◽  
Adam Tarnowski ◽  
Justyna Harasimczuk

Distraction of the driver's attention is one of the key aspects of research conducted by automotive companies. It concerns not only on-board devices, but also the factors outside the vehicle, such as advertising displays. Too much attention focused on advertisements can have negative impact on the driver's behaviour and driving quality. The 2-second distraction can more than double the risk of an accident. The paper presents the results of a simulator-based study, in which 60 drivers (including 30 women) age- 18-64 take part. All participants had a valid driving license and differed in their driving experience. It has been verified how the time of focusing the attention on the roadside advertisements affects the given safety and driving performance indicators.


2014 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-94
Author(s):  
K. Shawki ◽  
A. Soliman ◽  
M. Abou- Elenein

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document