Vena Cava Filter

2021 ◽  
pp. 349-359
Author(s):  
David Maldow
Keyword(s):  
1999 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 679
Author(s):  
Seung Hoon Lee ◽  
Kyu Bo Sung ◽  
Hyun Ki Yoon ◽  
Jae Cheol Hwang ◽  
Doek Hee Lee ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-45
Author(s):  
Caterina Praticò ◽  
Vincenzo Fodale ◽  
Anna M. D'Amico ◽  
Salvatore Lamberto ◽  
Letterio B. Santamaria
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-22
Author(s):  
José Eduardo Telich-Tarriba ◽  
◽  
Rodrigo Bolaños-Jiménez ◽  
Jorge Arizmendi-Vargas ◽  
Alejandra Martínez-Schulted ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
James L. Ebaugh ◽  
Andy C. Chiou ◽  
Mark D. Morasch ◽  
Jon S. Matsumura ◽  
William H. Pearce

Author(s):  
Silvia Di Bari ◽  
Marcello Bisulli ◽  
Emanuele Russo ◽  
Luca Bissoni ◽  
Costanza Martino ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Savannah Fletcher ◽  
Adam Plotnik ◽  
Ravi N. Srinivasa ◽  
Jeffrey Forris Beecham Chick ◽  
John M. Moriarty

Abstract Purpose of review Describe the role of inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) retrieval in patients on chronic anticoagulation given the overlap of these treatment options in the management of patients with venous thromboembolic disease. Recent findings Despite the increase in IVCF retrievals since the Food and Drug Administration safety communications in 2010 and 2014, retrieval rates remain low. Previous studies have shown that longer filter dwell times are associated with greater risk for filter complications and more difficulty with filter retrievals. Recent findings suggest that complications are more frequent in the first 30 days after placement. Summary The decision to retrieve an optional IVCF is individualized and requires diligent follow-up with consistent re-evaluation of the need for the indwelling IVCF, particularly in those on long-term anticoagulation therapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document