Foundations of Feature Selection in Clinical Prediction Modeling

2021 ◽  
pp. 51-57
Author(s):  
Victor E. Staartjes ◽  
Julius M. Kernbach ◽  
Vittorio Stumpo ◽  
Christiaan H. B. van Niftrik ◽  
Carlo Serra ◽  
...  
Neurosurgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 85 (3) ◽  
pp. 302-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hendrik-Jan Mijderwijk ◽  
Ewout W Steyerberg ◽  
Hans-Jakob Steiger ◽  
Igor Fischer ◽  
Marcel A Kamp

AbstractClinical prediction models in neurosurgery are increasingly reported. These models aim to provide an evidence-based approach to the estimation of the probability of a neurosurgical outcome by combining 2 or more prognostic variables. Model development and model reporting are often suboptimal. A basic understanding of the methodology of clinical prediction modeling is needed when interpreting these models. We address basic statistical background, 7 modeling steps, and requirements of these models such that they may fulfill their potential for major impact for our daily clinical practice and for future scientific work.


2021 ◽  
pp. 65-73
Author(s):  
Michael C. Jin ◽  
Adrian J. Rodrigues ◽  
Michael Jensen ◽  
Anand Veeravagu

2020 ◽  
Vol 222 (1) ◽  
pp. S325-S326
Author(s):  
Michael Beninati ◽  
Valery Danilack ◽  
Phinnara Has ◽  
Sebastian Ramos ◽  
David Savitz ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 71 ◽  
pp. 76-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farideh Bagherzadeh-Khiabani ◽  
Azra Ramezankhani ◽  
Fereidoun Azizi ◽  
Farzad Hadaegh ◽  
Ewout W. Steyerberg ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 333-339
Author(s):  
Elie Massaad ◽  
Yoon Ha ◽  
Ganesh M. Shankar ◽  
John H. Shin

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
John H. Phan ◽  
Andrew N. Young ◽  
May D. Wang

Combining multiple microarray datasets increases sample size and leads to improved reproducibility in identification of informative genes and subsequent clinical prediction. Although microarrays have increased the rate of genomic data collection, sample size is still a major issue when identifying informative genetic biomarkers. Because of this, feature selection methods often suffer from false discoveries, resulting in poorly performing predictive models. We develop a simple meta-analysis-based feature selection method that captures the knowledge in each individual dataset and combines the results using a simple rank average. In a comprehensive study that measures robustness in terms of clinical application (i.e., breast, renal, and pancreatic cancer), microarray platform heterogeneity, and classifier (i.e., logistic regression, diagonal LDA, and linear SVM), we compare the rank average meta-analysis method to five other meta-analysis methods. Results indicate that rank average meta-analysis consistently performs well compared to five other meta-analysis methods.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document