Robotic Transcervical and Transhiatal Esophagectomy (RACE Procedure)

2021 ◽  
pp. 157-170
Author(s):  
Peter P. Grimminger ◽  
Giovanni Capovilla ◽  
Carolina Froiio ◽  
Hubert Stein
2002 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 212-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth C. van Doorn ◽  
Jim Reekers ◽  
Bas A. J. M. de Mol ◽  
Huug Obertop ◽  
Ron Balm

1987 ◽  
Vol 5 (8) ◽  
pp. 1143-1149 ◽  
Author(s):  
A A Forastiere ◽  
M Gennis ◽  
M B Orringer ◽  
F P Agha

Thirty-six patients with adenocarcinoma or epidermoid carcinoma of the esophagus were entered into a phase II trial evaluating the combination of cisplatin 100 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) day 2, vinblastine 1.6 mg/m2 IV days 1 to 4, and mitoguazone (MGBG) 500 mg/m2 IV days 1 and 8. Twenty-nine patients (group A) were newly diagnosed with local-regional disease only and were candidates for transhiatal esophagectomy (THE). These patients received two courses of chemotherapy at 3-week intervals prior to surgery. Response was assessed by measuring changes in the primary tumor length and depth on serial biphasic contrast esophagrams and comparing this result with tumor measurements obtained from the surgical specimen. Complete (CR) and partial responders (PR) received three additional postoperative cycles. Seven patients had recurrent or metastatic disease (group B) and were treated every 4 weeks until disease progression. Of 34 patients evaluable for response, there was one pathologically confirmed CR and 15 PRs (47%). This consisted of 12 of 27 (44%) group A patients (seven of 11 epidermoid, five of 16 adenocarcinoma) and four of seven (57%) group B patients (two of four epidermoid, two of three adenocarcinoma). Toxicity included leukopenia in one third of treatment courses and thrombocytopenia in 21%. Nausea and vomiting occurred in 60% of patients, diarrhea in 18%, transient nephrotoxicity in 18%, peripheral neuropathy in 12%, and ototoxicity in 3%. Twenty-five group A patients underwent resection. Four chemotherapy nonresponders (NR) and one PR had known disease left at surgery; all others (80%) had gross total removal of their disease. The median survival time (MST) of the 29 group A patients was 14 months, with 21% alive at 36 months. The MST of group A chemotherapy responders was 15 months compared with 9 months for NRs (P = .032). Initial sites of recurrence in 14 patients were local-regional in six, distant only in six, both local-regional and distant in two. This regimen, administered in maximally tolerated doses, was active in epidermoid and adenocarcinoma histologies, recurrent disease and newly diagnosed patients. However, nearly all responses were PRs and the MST of resected patients was similar to a prior series of patients treated with esophagectomy alone. Observations from this pilot trial and those of others have led to a follow-up study, in progress, evaluating intensive preoperative chemotherapy and concurrent radiation therapy (RT).


2008 ◽  
Vol 134 (4) ◽  
pp. A-901
Author(s):  
Martin I. Montenovo ◽  
Kyle J. Chambers ◽  
Carlos A. Pellegrini ◽  
Brant K. Oelschlager

Author(s):  
Flavio Roberto Takeda ◽  
Rubens Antonio Aissar Sallum ◽  
Felipe Alexandre Fernandes ◽  
Ivan Cecconello

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Subramanyeshwar Rao Thammineedi

Abstract   Post esophagectomy anastomotic leakage and stricture are crucial factors in determining morbidity and mortality. Good vascularity of the gastric conduit is essential to avoid this complications. This prospective study assesses the utility of intraoperative indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging to determine gastric conduit vascularity in patients undergoing esophagectomy. Methods Thirteen consecutive patients who were undergoing esophagectomy for carcinoma middle, lower third esophagus or gastro-esophageal junction from August 2019 to September 2019, were included. Three patients underwent laparoscopic-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy, ten thoraco-laparoscopic assisted esophagectomy. Reconstruction was done by gastric pull up via posterior mediastinal route. Vascularity of gastric conduit was assessed by the near-infrared camera using ICG. Results On visual assessment of perfusion at the tip of gastric conduit, it was dusky in 11 patients, pink in two. Fuorescence imaging showed inadequate perfusion at the tip of conduit in 12 patients, needing revision. In one patient visual inspection showed adequate perfusion, but ICG disclosed poor vascularity requiring revision of the conduit’s tip. Resection of the devitalized portion of the proximal esophageal stump was needed in 5 patients both by visual and ICG assessment. The median time to appearance of blush from the time of injection of dye was 15 seconds (10 to 23 seconds). Conclusion Visual inspection of the gastric conduit vascularity can underestimate perfusion and hence can compromise resection of the devitalized part. ICG fluorescence imaging is more objective and promising means to ascertain the vascularity of gastric conduit during an esophagectomy. It could complement the visual inspection to decide the site of anastomosis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Flávio Sabino ◽  
Marco Guimarães-Filho ◽  
Luciana Ribeiro ◽  
Daniel Fernandes ◽  
Luis Felipe Pinto

Abstract   The standard esophageal replacement after esophagectomy for cancer treatment is a gastric conduit, as it is a simpler technique than the other options available, requiring only one anastomosis. However, when the stomach is not available, a left- or right colon graft interposition can be performed. The purpose of this study was to review our experience with colon interposition following esophagectomy for cancer and assess the surgical outcomes. Methods The clinical data and surgical outcomes form patients who underwent esophagectomy with colon interposition for cancer treatment, in a single institution, between January 1990 and December 2017. The results were compared with cases with gastric reconstruction. Results From January 1990 and December 2017, 25 cases of transhiatal esophagectomy with colon interposition were identified. In the same period, 97 cases of transhiatal esophagectomy with gastric pull-up were also performed. The patient’s clinical data and surgical outcomes are presented in Table 1. The indication for performing a colon interposition was positive distal margin in 87% of cases, gastric conduit ischemia in 8,7% and prior gastric surgery in 4,3%. The most common pull-up route was the posterior mediastinum (87%). Conclusion Our results are in line with the literature and demonstrate that colon interposition after esophagectomy is feasible and, despite having a significant morbimortality, appears to be a valuable alternative for the challenging situation where the stomach is not available.


2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 305-313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan G. Urba ◽  
Mark B. Orringer ◽  
Andrew Turrisi ◽  
Mark Iannettoni ◽  
Arlene Forastiere ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: A pilot study of 43 patients with potentially resectable esophageal carcinoma treated with an intensive regimen of preoperative chemoradiation with cisplatin, fluorouracil, and vinblastine before surgery showed a median survival of 29 months in comparison with the 12-month median survival of 100 historical controls treated with surgery alone at the same institution. We designed a randomized trial to compare survival for patients treated with this preoperative chemoradiation regimen versus surgery alone.MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred patients with esophageal carcinoma were randomized to receive either surgery alone (arm I) or preoperative chemoradiation (arm II) with cisplatin 20 mg/m2/d on days 1 through 5 and 17 through 21, fluorouracil 300 mg/m2/d on days 1 through 21, and vinblastine 1 mg/m2/d on days 1 through 4 and 17 through 20. Radiotherapy consisted of 1.5-Gy fractions twice daily, Monday through Friday over 21 days, to a total dose of 45 Gy. Transhiatal esophagectomy with a cervical esophagogastric anastomosis was performed on approximately day 42.RESULTS: At median follow-up of 8.2 years, there is no significant difference in survival between the treatment arms. Median survival is 17.6 months in arm I and 16.9 months in arm II. Survival at 3 years was 16% in arm I and 30% in arm II (P = .15). This study was statistically powered to detect a relatively large increase in median survival from 1 year to 2.2 years, with at least 80% power.CONCLUSION: This randomized trial of preoperative chemoradiation versus surgery alone for patients with potentially resectable esophageal carcinoma did not demonstrate a statistically significant survival difference.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document