scholarly journals Object Detection with RetinaNet on Aerial Imagery: The Algarve Landscape

2021 ◽  
pp. 501-516
Author(s):  
C. Coelho ◽  
M. Fernanda P. Costa ◽  
L. L. Ferrás ◽  
A. J. Soares
IEEE Access ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 173855-173865 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yashan Wang ◽  
Yue Zhang ◽  
Yi Zhang ◽  
Liangjin Zhao ◽  
Xian Sun ◽  
...  

IEEE Access ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 92791-92801
Author(s):  
Miaohui Zhang ◽  
Bo Zhang ◽  
Mengya Liu ◽  
Ming Xin

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Wolf ◽  
Jonas Meier ◽  
Lars Sommer ◽  
Jurgen Beyerer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirela Beloiu ◽  
Dimitris Poursanidis ◽  
Samuel Hoffmann ◽  
Nektarios Chrysoulakis ◽  
Carl Beierkuhnlein

<p>Recent advances in deep learning techniques for object detection and the availability of high-resolution images facilitate the analysis of both temporal and spatial vegetation patterns in remote areas. High-resolution satellite imagery has been used successfully to detect trees in small areas with homogeneous rather than heterogeneous forests, in which single tree species have a strong contrast compared to their neighbors and landscape. However, no research to date has detected trees at the treeline in the remote and complex heterogeneous landscape of Greece using deep learning methods. We integrated high-resolution aerial images, climate data, and topographical characteristics to study the treeline dynamic over 70 years in the Samaria National Park on the Mediterranean island of Crete, Greece. We combined mapping techniques with deep learning approaches to detect and analyze spatio-temporal dynamics in treeline position and tree density. We use visual image interpretation to detect single trees on high-resolution aerial imagery from 1945, 2008, and 2015. Using the RGB aerial images from 2008 and 2015 we test a Convolution Neural Networks (CNN)-object detection approach (SSD) and a CNN-based segmentation technique (U-Net). Based on the mapping and deep learning approach, we have not detected a shift in treeline elevation over the last 70 years, despite warming, although tree density has increased. However, we show that CNN approach accurately detects and maps tree position and density at the treeline. We also reveal that the treeline elevation on Crete varies with topography. Treeline elevation decreases from the southern to the northern study sites. We explain these differences between study sites by the long-term interaction between topographical characteristics and meteorological factors. The study highlights the feasibility of using deep learning and high-resolution imagery as a promising technique for monitoring forests in remote areas.</p>


2022 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 255
Author(s):  
Xin Gao ◽  
Sundaresh Ram ◽  
Rohit C. Philip ◽  
Jeffrey J. Rodríguez ◽  
Jeno Szep ◽  
...  

In low-resolution wide-area aerial imagery, object detection algorithms are categorized as feature extraction and machine learning approaches, where the former often requires a post-processing scheme to reduce false detections and the latter demands multi-stage learning followed by post-processing. In this paper, we present an approach on how to select post-processing schemes for aerial object detection. We evaluated combinations of each of ten vehicle detection algorithms with any of seven post-processing schemes, where the best three schemes for each algorithm were determined using average F-score metric. The performance improvement is quantified using basic information retrieval metrics as well as the classification of events, activities and relationships (CLEAR) metrics. We also implemented a two-stage learning algorithm using a hundred-layer densely connected convolutional neural network for small object detection and evaluated its degree of improvement when combined with the various post-processing schemes. The highest average F-scores after post-processing are 0.902, 0.704 and 0.891 for the Tucson, Phoenix and online VEDAI datasets, respectively. The combined results prove that our enhanced three-stage post-processing scheme achieves a mean average precision (mAP) of 63.9% for feature extraction methods and 82.8% for the machine learning approach.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document