What Can Cost Benefit Analysis Learn from Decision Analysis?

1978 ◽  
pp. 7-31
Author(s):  
Alan Williams
Keyword(s):  
Decision Analysis ◽  
Cost Benefit Analysis ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Benefit Analysis

Fynbos (fine bush) vegetation and the supply of water: a comparison of multi-criteria decision analysis and cost-benefit analysis

1997 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 123-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison R Joubert ◽  
Anthony Leiman ◽  
Helen M de Klerk ◽  
Stephen Katua ◽  
J.Coenrad Aggenbach
Keyword(s):  
Decision Analysis ◽  
Cost Benefit Analysis ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Benefit Analysis ◽  
Multi Criteria Decision Analysis

scholarly journals Which Methods Are Useful to Justify Public Policies? An Analysis of Cost–Benefit Analysis, Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, and Non-Aggregate Indicator Systems

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gertrude Hirsch Hadorn
Keyword(s):  
Decision Analysis ◽  
Cost Benefit Analysis ◽  
Policy Issue ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Benefit Analysis ◽  
Multi Criteria Decision Analysis ◽  
Dimensional Measurement ◽  
Valuation Method ◽  
Future Outcomes ◽  
Indicator Systems

AbstractScience-based methods for assessing the practical rationality of a proposed public policy typically represent assumed future outcomes of policies and values attributed to these outcomes in an idealized, that is, intentionally distorted way and abstracted from aspects that are deemed irrelevant. Different types of methods do so in different ways. As a consequence, they instantiate the properties that result from abstraction and idealization such as conceptual simplicity versus complexity, or comprehensiveness versus selectivity of the values under consideration to different degrees. I hold that none of these methods is best in general. Instead, I opt for the valuation method that is useful for the policy issue in question both in terms of its relevance and in terms of its practicability. Relevance requires that the method can represent and account for what is at stake in the policy issue. Practicability refers to aspects such as easy versus difficult handling of the method. To argue for the claim, I evaluate three types of valuation methods: (1) cost–benefit analysis that rests on unidimensional measurement and ranking, (2) multi-criteria decision analysis that applies multi-dimensional measurement but unidimensional ranking, and (3) non-aggregate indicator systems that operate with multi-dimensional measurement and sometimes also multi-dimensional ranking. Second-order justification indicating whether and how the valuation method chosen is capable of accounting for the substantive value considerations that constitute the real-world policy issue in question renders the conditions on which the results of a proposed policy evaluation rest transparent.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document