Spread of Excitation and Injected Current in the Tunicate Myocardium

Author(s):  
Mahlon E. Kriebel
Keyword(s):  
1949 ◽  
Vol 110 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 110-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Rashbass ◽  
W. A. H. Rushton
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 405 ◽  
pp. 108235
Author(s):  
Samuel Söderqvist ◽  
Satu Lamminmäki ◽  
Antti Aarnisalo ◽  
Timo Hirvonen ◽  
Saku T. Sinkkonen ◽  
...  

Pain ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 135 (3) ◽  
pp. 300-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Doris Schoffnegger ◽  
Ruth Ruscheweyh ◽  
Jürgen Sandkühler

2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (sup1) ◽  
pp. 479-481 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Walkowiak ◽  
Bozena Kostek ◽  
Artur Lorens ◽  
Anita Obrycka ◽  
Arkadiusz Wasowski ◽  
...  

1969 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 513-528
Author(s):  
PETER E. PICKENS

1. Two kinds of electrical potentials can be recorded from the surface of the. retractor muscle of the anemone, Calamactis, during rapid contraction. These are large muscle action potentials and smaller pulses which are thought to be nerve spikes The latter resemble nerve impulses of higher organisms in that they are all-or-none and of short duration. 2. A nerve spike follows each of a pair of electrical stimuli, but the muscle potential and contraction occur only after the second shock, indicating that facilitation is required at the neuromuscular junction. 3. The size of the muscle potential and of the contraction are correlated with the interval between paired electrical stimuli. Maximum size is reached when stimuli are zoo msec. apart even though the minimum effective interval is 30 msec. 4. A muscle potential precedes contraction only along the upper part of the retractor muscle and this is the part that contracts rapidly during the withdrawal response. The lower retractor does not contract. 5. Conduction velocity along the upper retractor is higher than along the lower. The histological correlate of rapid conduction is a nerve net with large, long, longitudinally oriented fibres. 6. The refractory period of the conducting system of the upper retractor is shorter than that of the lower retractor. Consequently, spread of excitation toward the aboral end is limited if paired stimuli are further apart than 250-300 msec. 7. A mechanical stimulus which is just strong enough to elicit a withdrawal response evokes a single muscle potential of maximum size, suggesting that two nerve impulses closer together than 200 msec. precede the muscle potential. Stronger mechanical stimuli evoke a burst of muscle potentials.


1968 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 600-621 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. O. Mackie ◽  
L. M. Passano

Sarsia, Euphysa, and other hydromedusae have been studied by electrophysiological techniques and are found to have nonnervous conducting epithelia resembling those described earlier for siphonophores. Simple, nonmuscular epithelia fire singly or repetitively following brief electrical stimuli. The pulses recorded with suction electrodes are biphasic, initially positive, and show amplitudes of 0.75–2.0 mv, durations of 5–15 msec, and velocities of 15–35 cm/sec with short refractory periods. In the swimming muscle (myoepithelium) 2.0–4.0 mv composite events lasting 150–300 msec are associated with contraction waves. Propagation in nonnervous epithelia is typically all-or-none, nondecremental, and unpolarized. The subumbrellar endoderm lamella conducts independently of the adjacent ectoderm. The lower regions of the tentacles do not show propagated epithelial events. The spread of excitation in conducting epithelia and associated effector responses are described. Examples are given of interaction between events seemingly conducted in the nervous system and those in nonnervous epithelia. Either system may excite the other. Spontaneous activity, however, appears to originate in the nervous system. Conduction in nonnervous tissues is unaffected by excess Mg++ in concentrations suppressing presumed nervous activity, although this may not be a wholly adequate criterion for distinguishing components of the two systems. Evidence from old work by Romanes is considered in the light of these findings and the general significance of epithelial conduction is discussed.


2014 ◽  
Vol 136 (6) ◽  
pp. 3159-3171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenny L. Goehring ◽  
Donna L. Neff ◽  
Jacquelyn L. Baudhuin ◽  
Michelle L. Hughes

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. e0236179
Author(s):  
Ning Zhou ◽  
Zhen Zhu ◽  
Lixue Dong ◽  
John J. Galvin

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document