Transport Equations and Orlicz Spaces

Author(s):  
Alexandre V. Kazhikhov ◽  
Alexandre E. Mamontov
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glyn Kennell ◽  
Richard Evitts

The presented simulated data compares concentration gradients and electric fields with experimental and numerical data of others. This data is simulated for cases involving liquid junctions and electrolytic transport. The objective of presenting this data is to support a model and theory. This theory demonstrates the incompatibility between conventional electrostatics inherent in Maxwell's equations with conventional transport equations. <br>


2020 ◽  
Vol 72 (2) ◽  
pp. 235-259
Author(s):  
Lech Maligranda ◽  
Katsuo Matsuoka

2012 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 245
Author(s):  
Feng LUO ◽  
Lin YU ◽  
Hongping GUO
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 55
Author(s):  
Xiaohong WU ◽  
Garidi WU

1997 ◽  
Vol 36 (8-9) ◽  
pp. 123-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Nalluri ◽  
A. K. El-Zaemey ◽  
H. L. Chan

An appraisal of the existing sediment transport equations was made using May et al (1989) and Ackers (1991) sediment transport equations for the limit of deposition design criterion and with a deposit depth of 1% of the pipe diameter allowed in the sewers. The applicability of those equations for sewers with larger fixed bed deposit depth was assessed, the equations generally over-estimated the transport velocity. Modifications were made to enable the equations to apply to sewers with large fixed bed deposits present.


2004 ◽  
Vol 11 (04) ◽  
pp. 359-375 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. F. Streater

Let H0 be a selfadjoint operator such that Tr e−βH0 is of trace class for some β < 1, and let χɛ denote the set of ɛ-bounded forms, i.e., ∥(H0+C)−1/2−ɛX(H0+C)−1/2+ɛ∥ < C for some C > 0. Let χ := Span ∪ɛ∈(0,1/2]χɛ. Let [Formula: see text] denote the underlying set of the quantum information manifold of states of the form ρx = e−H0−X−ψx, X ∈ χ. We show that if Tr e−H0 = 1. 1. the map Φ, [Formula: see text] is a quantum Young function defined on χ 2. The Orlicz space defined by Φ is the tangent space of [Formula: see text] at ρ0; its affine structure is defined by the (+1)-connection of Amari 3. The subset of a ‘hood of ρ0, consisting of p-nearby states (those [Formula: see text] obeying C−1ρ1+p ≤ σ ≤ Cρ1 − p for some C > 1) admits a flat affine connection known as the (−1) connection, and the span of this set is part of the cotangent space of [Formula: see text] 4. These dual structures extend to the completions in the Luxemburg norms.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document