Arguments from Parallel Reasoning

2014 ◽  
pp. 91-107
Author(s):  
Jan Albert van Laar
Keyword(s):  
Parallel Reasoning

UNFOLDING PARALLEL REASONING IN ISLAMIC JURISPRUDENCE

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shahid Rahman ◽  
Muhammad Iqbal
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Philosophy Of Science ◽  
Legal Reasoning ◽  
Initial Study ◽  
Contemporary Philosophy ◽  
Fine Grained ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Islamic Jurisprudence ◽  
Parallel Reasoning

AbstractOne of the epistemological results emerging from this initial study is that the different forms of co-relational inference, known in the Islamic jurisprudence as qiyās, represent an innovative and sophisticated form of reasoning that not only provides new epistemological insights into legal reasoning in general but also furnishes a fine-grained pattern for parallel reasoning which can be deployed in a wide range of problem-solving contexts and does not seem to reduce to the standard forms of analogical argumentation studied in contemporary philosophy of science. However, in the present paper we will only discuss the case of so-called co-relational inferences of the occasioning factor and only in the context of Islamic jurisprudence.

scholarly journals SWRL Parallel Reasoning Implementation with Spark SQL

2020 ◽  
Vol 719 ◽  
pp. 012020
Author(s):  
Wan Li ◽  
Huaai Kang ◽  
Dongbo Ma ◽  
Weiwei Wei
Keyword(s):  
Parallel Reasoning

scholarly journals Parallel Reasoning by Ratio Legis in Contemporary Jurisprudence. Elements for a Dialogical Approach

2021 ◽  
pp. 163-187
Author(s):  
M. Dolors Martínez-Cazalla ◽  
Tania Menéndez-Martín ◽  
Shahid Rahman
Keyword(s):  
Dialogical Approach ◽  
Parallel Reasoning

scholarly journals The Chief Supreme Court Justice: A Metaphysical Puzzle?

2007 ◽  
Vol 39 (115) ◽  
pp. 61-68
Author(s):  
Dan López de Sa
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Supreme Court Justice ◽  
Singular Terms ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Parallel Reasoning

What are things like the Supreme Court? Gabriel Uzquiano has defended that they are groups, entities which are somehow composed of members (at certain times) but which, unlike sets (or pluralities), allow for fluctuation in membership. The main alternative holds that ‘the Supreme Court’ refers (at any time) to the set (or plurality) of their members (at the time). Uzquiano motivates his view by posing a metaphysical puzzle for this reductive alternative. I argue that a parallel reasoning would also find a corresponding “puzzle” in the case of singular terms like ‘The Chief Supreme Court Justice’.

Elements for a Dialogical Approach on Parallel Reasoning. A Case Study of Spanish Civil Law

2021 ◽  
pp. 217-254
Author(s):  
Maria Dolors Martínez-Cazalla ◽  
Tania Menéndez-Martín ◽  
Shahid Rahman ◽  
Hans Christian Nordtveit Kvernenes
Keyword(s):  
Civil Law ◽  
Dialogical Approach ◽  
Parallel Reasoning

RDFS Rule based Parallel Reasoning Scheme for Large-Scale Streaming Sensor Data

2014 ◽  
Vol 41 (9) ◽  
pp. 686-698
Author(s):  
SoonHyun Kwon ◽  
Youngtack Park
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Sensor Data ◽  
Rule Based ◽  
Parallel Reasoning
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document