Positional Therapy, Consequences for and Implementation in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Guidelines

Author(s):  
Nico de Vries ◽  
Madeline Ravesloot
2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (02) ◽  
pp. 131-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grietje E. de Vries ◽  
Aarnoud Hoekema ◽  
Michiel H.J. Doff ◽  
Huib A.M. Kerstjens ◽  
Petra M. Meijer ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 425-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raphael C. Heinzer ◽  
Cyril Pellaton ◽  
Vincianne Rey ◽  
Andrea O. Rossetti ◽  
Gianpaolo Lecciso ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 1661-1662
Author(s):  
Lorenzo Marra ◽  
Pierluigi Intiglietta ◽  
Silvano Dragonieri ◽  
Pierluigi Carratù ◽  
Valentina Di Lecce ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 262-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Svatikova ◽  
Ronald D. Chervin ◽  
Jeffrey J. Wing ◽  
Brisa N. Sanchez ◽  
Erin M. Migda ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Giannicola Iannella ◽  
Giuseppe Magliulo ◽  
Cristina Lo Iacono ◽  
Giulia Bianchi ◽  
Antonella Polimeni ◽  
...  

Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of position-dependent obstructive sleep apnea (POSA) in elderly patients (≥65 years old). Adult (range 19-65 years old) and elderly patients were also compared in order to show differences in the incidence of POSA between these two groups of patients. Methods A prospective bi-center study was performed between January 2018 and May 2019. A total of 434 participants underwent polysomnography (PSG) study at home (Embletta MPR). Body position during the PSG recordings was determined. Patients were subdivided in two groups: those aged between 19 and 65 years old (adult patients) and ≥65 years old (elderly patients). POSA patients were defined using Cartwright’s system, Bignold classification, and the new Amsterdam Positional OSA Classification (APOC). Results The prevalence of POSA in elderly patients differed according to the classification system used: 49.3% using Cartwright’s classification system, 20.5% with the Bignold classification, and 22.6%, 38.9%, and 5.4% of APOC 1, APOC 2, and APOC3 sub-classes were respectively identified for the APOC classification system. No difference between adult and elderly patients regarding the prevalence of POSA was observed. No statistical differences emerged between the two groups of patients in terms of supine (p = 0.9) and non-supine AHI (p = 0.4). Conclusions A significant number of elderly patients could be considered treatable with positional therapy according to the APOC classification. However, the efficacy and applicability of positional therapy in elderly patients must be confirmed by further research.


2011 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 150-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Se Joong KIM ◽  
Jiho CHOI ◽  
Young Hwan PARK ◽  
Jung Hwa HONG ◽  
Dongsun PARK ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document