BMJ ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 341 (oct13 2) ◽  
pp. c5668-c5668
Author(s):  
T. Richards

2003 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 273-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
ANDRÁS SIMONOVITS

This paper applies the method of mechanism design to find optimal linear pension rules (contribution rate and monthly benefit function) for flexible retirement: First the government announces a rule, making the benefit dependent on employment length. Each individual, having private information on his own expected lifespan and utility function, optimizes his employment length, conditional on that rule. The government chooses the optimal Bayesian linear rule, which maximizes the social welfare (e.g. the aggregate individual maxima) under a social constraint (e.g. the aggregate net lifetime contribution equals zero). Under this rule there is a better compromise between incentives and insurance than under so-called actuarially fair benefits.


2006 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 519-531 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raija Gould

The Finnish pension reform of 2005 introduced the concept of a flexible retirement age. Drawing upon a longitudinal study of older Finnish employees, this article examines the extent to which individual propensity to delay retirement is influenced by choice or by chance, and examines the effects of the interplay between chances and choices in affecting longevity of employment. The results suggest that the flexibility in the organisation of the end of the working life is biased towards the better off. They also show that the interplay of choice and chance in the retirement process is firmly tied to the existing age-arrangements and economic trends. The conclusions examine the implication of these findings for divergent routes towards late retirement.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document