A Decision Support Framework for Prioritization of Engineering Asset Management Activities Under Uncertainty

Author(s):  
Michael E. Cholette ◽  
Lin Ma ◽  
Lawrence Buckingham ◽  
Lutfiye Allahmanli ◽  
Andrew Bannister ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefanie Niekamp ◽  
Ujjwal R. Bharadwaj ◽  
Jhuma Sadhukhan ◽  
Marios K. Chryssanthopoulos

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. K. Kirkman ◽  
John K. Hiers A. ◽  
L. L. Smith ◽  
L. M. Conner ◽  
S. L. Zeigler ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
S.E. Walters ◽  
D. Savic ◽  
R.J. Hocking

The water industry over the years has primarily focussed on upgrading and investing in clean water provision. However, as research into the science and management of clean water services has progressed rapidly, wastewater provision and services has been slower. Focus, though, is now shifting within Industry and Research into wastewater services. The water regulator, Ofwat, for England and Wales demands the Sewerage Undertakers demonstrate efficient management of wastewater systems in order to obtain funding for Capital Investment projects. South West Water, a Water Service Provider and Sewerage Undertaker located in the South West of England, identified a need gap in their asset management strategies for wastewater catchments. This paper will introduce the production of a Decision Support Tool, DST, to help SWW proactively manage their Wastewater Catchments, examining Sewage Treatment Works, Pumping Stations and Networks. The paper will discuss some concepts within the DST, its production, testing and a brief case study. The DST provides a framework for prioritising catchments to optimise investment choices and actions. The Tool ranks catchments utilising Compromise Programming, CP, as well as AHP Pair-wise comparisons for preference weights. The DST incorporates Asset models, a Whole life Costing Module, as well as a Decay and Intervention Module.


2021 ◽  
Vol 55 (5) ◽  
pp. 2890-2898 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tami C. Bond ◽  
Angela Bosco-Lauth ◽  
Delphine K. Farmer ◽  
Paul W. Francisco ◽  
Jeffrey R. Pierce ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
David Kik ◽  
Matthias Gerhard Wichmann ◽  
Thomas Stefan Spengler

AbstractLocation choice is a crucial planning task with major influence on a company’s future orientation and competitiveness. It is quite complex, since multiple location factors are usually of decision-relevance, incomparable, and sometimes conflictual. Further, ongoing urbanization is associated with locational dynamics posing major challenges for the regional location management of companies and municipalities. For example, respecting urban space as location factor, a scarcity growing over time leads to different assessment and requirements on a company’s behalf. For both companies and municipalities, there is a need for location development which implies an active change of location factor characteristics. Accordingly, considering locational dynamics is vital, as they may be decisive in the location decision-making. Although certain dynamics are considered within conventional Facility Location Problem (FLP) approaches, a systematic consideration of active location development is missing so far. Consequently, they may propagate long-term unfavorable location decisions, as major potentials associated with company-driven and municipal development measures are neglected. Therefore, this paper introduces a comprehensive decision support framework for the Regional Facility Location and Development planning Problem (RFLDP). It provides an operationalization of development measures, and thus anticipates dynamic adaptations to the environment. An established multi-criteria approach is extended to this new application. A complementary guideline ensures its meaningful applicability by practitioners. Based on a real-life case study, the decision support framework’s strength for practical application is demonstrated. Here, major advantages over conventional FLP approaches are highlighted. It is shown that the proposed methodology results in alternative location decisions which are structurally superior.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document