Summary Representation

Author(s):  
Andrea Karaiskaki ◽  
Xenia Anastassiou-Hadjicharalambous
Author(s):  
Gabor M. Karadi ◽  
Enrique De Miguel ◽  
Raymond J. Krizek

1972 ◽  
Vol 98 (1) ◽  
pp. 141-157
Author(s):  
Antonio Santos-Moreno ◽  
Raymond J. Krizek ◽  
Gabor M. Karadi

IBRO Reports ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. S327
Author(s):  
Young-Beom Lee ◽  
Yee-Joon Kim ◽  
Doyun Lee

1968 ◽  
Vol 88 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Boardman

This article is intended not only to record additions and corrections to Island Gems (published by the Hellenic Society in 1963 as its tenth Supplementary Volume; here abbreviated IGems), but also to discuss a class of engraved stones which was not properly distinguished in that book. The main series of Island Gems belongs to the seventh and early sixth centuries B.C. Most of the stones and a few of their devices copy Bronze Age forms, and the material is generally a distinctive, often translucent, green serpentine (‘steatite’). This series ends in the first half of the sixth century, but it was possible to identify, by their material and technique, some later gems from Island workshops which correspond in style and shape with the contemporary Greek scarabs in harder materials. The comparatively soft material had meant that the intaglio devices on Island gems could be cut without recourse to the drill or cutting wheel, and this technique was retained for the later scarabs. It is evident, however, that for a while already in the sixth century Island artists had experimented with the harder materials then being employed for engraved seals in Greece; and with some shapes which seem to compromise between the old and the new. These stones seem to belong to the middle and second half of the sixth century. A list follows:(i) Oxford 1925.129. plate I. Green steatite tapered scaraboid with convex face. L. 20 (mm.). A lion. IGems no. 349, fig. 6, pl. 13.(ii) Athens, from Sunium. plate I. Green steatite. Shape as the last. L. 20. Contorted bull-headed man. IGems no. 350, pl. 13.(iii) Paris, Bibl. Nat., ex Louvre C 8514. Rock crystal plump lentoid. W. 18. Summary representation of a winged horse.(iv) Boston 27.678 (once Bruschi, Warren), plate I. Chalcedony lentoid with domed back and shallow convex face. W. 21. Facing head of a satyr with fillet ends behind the ears and an arrow marking at the centre of the forehead.


2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 7305-7364
Author(s):  
U. B. Gunturu ◽  
C. A. Schlosser

Abstract. Wind resource in the continental and offshore United States has been reconstructed and characterized using metrics that describe, apart from abundance, its availability, persistence and intermittency. The Modern Era Retrospective-Analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA) boundary layer flux data has been used to construct wind profile at 50 m, 80 m, 100 m, 120 m turbine hub heights. The wind power density (WPD) estimates at 50 m are qualitatively similar to those in the US wind atlas developed by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), but quantitatively a class less in some regions, but are within the limits of uncertainty. The wind speeds at 80 m were quantitatively and qualitatively close to the NREL wind map. The possible reasons for overestimation by NREL have been discussed. For long tailed distributions like those of the WPD, the mean is an overestimation and median is suggested for summary representation of the wind resource. The impact of raising the wind turbine hub height on metrics of abundance, persistence, variability and intermittency is analyzed. There is a general increase in availability and abundance of wind resource but there is an increase in intermittency in terms of level crossing rate in low resource regions.


1984 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 190-191
Author(s):  
C. Z. Tarlowski ◽  
A. P. Raiche ◽  
M. Nabighian

2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (10) ◽  
pp. 1723
Author(s):  
Ke TONG ◽  
Wei TANG ◽  
Wenfeng CHEN ◽  
Xiaolan FU

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document