Three Aspects of the Research Impact by a Scientist: Measurement Methods and an Empirical Evaluation

2015 ◽  
pp. 233-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boris Mirkin ◽  
Michael Orlov
Keyword(s):  
Empirical Evaluation ◽  
Research Impact ◽  
Measurement Methods

A critical comparison of selected implicit measurement methods.

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 249-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith Znanewitz ◽  
Lisa Braun ◽  
David Hensel ◽  
Claudia Fantapié Altobelli ◽  
Fabian Hattke
Keyword(s):  
Measurement Methods ◽  
Critical Comparison ◽  
Implicit Measurement

Male authors boost research impact through self-hyping studies

Nature ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 578 (7794) ◽  
pp. 328-328
Author(s):  
Chris Woolston
Keyword(s):  
Research Impact

Semi-empirical evaluation of Sr-Ar difference potentials

1986 ◽  
Vol 47 (7) ◽  
pp. 1149-1154
Author(s):  
Le Quang Rang ◽  
D. Voslamber
Keyword(s):  
Empirical Evaluation ◽  
Difference Potentials ◽  
Semi Empirical

Calibration of a Lyophilized Pooled Plasma as Candidate Reference Plasma for Standardization of the Prothrombin Time Ratio

1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (02) ◽  
pp. 96-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Beeser ◽  
U. Becker ◽  
H. J. Kolde ◽  
E. Spanuth ◽  
P. Witt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prothrombin Time ◽  
International Study ◽  
International Normalized Ratio ◽  
Measurement Methods ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Diagnostic Instruments ◽  
Plasma Pool ◽  
Normal Plasma ◽  
German Association ◽  
Prothrombin Time Ratio

SummaryThe prothrombin time (PT), obtained from a fresh normal plasma pool (FPP), is the basis both for the establishment of the 100% activity (normal plasma) and for the ratio calculation used in the International Normalized Ratio (INR) according to the recommendations of the ICSH/ICTH (6). Today the PT of lyophilized normal plasma pools are successfully used as reference for the assessment of samples in proficiency studies. However, a lack of comparability is to be recognized. Therefore the Committee of Hematology of the German Association of Diagnostics’ and Diagnostic Instruments’ Manufacturers (VDGH) decided to produce a candidate reference plasma (VDGH Reference Plasma) which was calibrated against fresh normal plasma pools in an international study.The basic calibration was performed by using the same certified BCR thromboplastin (BCT/099) by all participants. The endpoint was determined manually and by using the coagulometer Schnitger-Gross. In additional testings each participant used his own routine thromboplastins and methods. Calculating the ratio [PT VDGH Reference Plasma (sec)/PT fresh normal plasma pool (sec)] the VDGH Reference Plasma showed a deviation from the average fresh normal plasma pool of 1.05 both with the BCT/099 and with all thromboplastins. There were obtained some statistical differences between “plain” and “combined’’ (added factor V and fibrinogen) thromboplastins. No statistical difference was found between the different endpoint measurement methods (manual, mechanical, optical).In spite of these statistical deviations the VDGH Reference Plasma can be used for the standardization of the PT-normal (100%) value with different ratios for plain (1.06) and combined (1.02) thromboplastins. The manufacturers will use this VDGH Reference Plasma for the calibration of their commercially available calibration plasmas, which allows the user of such a material to calculate a calibrated 100% PT value.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document