Ecology of Pair-Bond Stability

Author(s):  
Geoff Kushnick
Keyword(s):  
2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 335-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan M. Ellsworth ◽  
Mary K. Shenk ◽  
Drew H. Bailey ◽  
Robert S. Walker

2017 ◽  
Vol 372 (1729) ◽  
pp. 20160318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Uggla ◽  
Ruth Mace

Evidence from animal species indicates that a male-biased adult sex ratio (ASR) can lead to higher levels of male parental investment and that there is heterogeneity in behavioural responses to mate scarcity depending on mate value. In humans, however, there is little consistent evidence of the effect of the ASR on pair-bond stability and parental investment and even less of how it varies by an individual's mate value. In this paper we use detailed census data from Northern Ireland to test the association between the ASR and pair-bond stability and parental investment by social status (education and social class) as a proxy for mate value. We find evidence that female, but not male, cohabitation is associated with the ASR. In female-biased areas women with low education are less likely to be in a stable pair-bond than highly educated women, but in male-biased areas women with the lowest education are as likely to be in a stable pair-bond as their most highly educated peers. For both sexes risk of separation is greater at female-biased sex ratios. Lastly, our data show a weak relationship between parental investment and the ASR that depends on social class. We discuss these results in the light of recent reformulations of parental investment theory. This article is part of the themed issue ‘Adult sex ratios and reproductive decisions: a critical re-examination of sex differences in human and animal societies’.


Behaviour ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 134 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 275-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelika Wosegien

AbstractMany long-lived birds form long-term pair bonds, but they sometimes divorce. Until now most suggestions concerning factors relevant to the stability of the pair bond in birds were based on correlational data, which do not allow conclusions about causal relationships. Here, the probability of divorce in domestic pigeons (Columba livia) was tested experimentally, and separately for both male and female. Breeding success and pair bond duration of pairs was manipulated. After separation from the mate for up to 60 days the subject (female or male) was allowed to court to a new mate for 4 hours. Then the subject was given a choice between the old and the new mate presented simultaneously on either side of the experimental cage. A further possibility to choose between the two mates was given in later stage in the familiar aviary. Female subjects without breeding success showed little courtship towards the old male, especially when they had nest-cooed a lot to the new male during the four hours exposure. In the latter cases they chose the new male in the experimental choice situation. The preference for the old mate in the choice situation by females with breeding success was positively related to the duration of the previous pair bond. All females that had been paired for at least 200 days (N = 11), chose their old males. On the other hand, 86% of the females that had been paired for less than 152 days, chose the new male. Forty percent of the male subjects with breeding success preferred the new female in the experimental choice situation. This preference was especially shown by males that had performed frequent nest-cooing during the four hours exposure period. In the aviary, however, all males with or without breeding success reoccupied their nest at once and started nest-cooing and finally courted the female which was able to defend access to the nest against other females. This was always the male's former mate. Males preferred to occupy a nest over courting with any particular female. The results are discussed in relation to existing hypotheses of divorce.


Author(s):  
Fernando Pelegrim Fernandes ◽  
Carolina Côcco Adorno ◽  
Tânia Mara da Silva ◽  
Fabiana Mantovani Gomes França ◽  
Cecilia Pedroso Turssi ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 86 (10) ◽  
pp. 3265-3273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shun-ichi Kawahara ◽  
Chojiro Kojima ◽  
Kazunari Taira ◽  
Tadafumi Uchimaru

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document