Surgical Techniques for Cubital Tunnel Syndrome and Chronic Medial Instability

2016 ◽  
pp. 25-40
Author(s):  
Samuel A. Antuña ◽  
Reimer Hoffmann ◽  
Raúl Barco
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Cubital Tunnel ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome

scholarly journals Cubital tunnel syndrome: Comparative results of a multicenter study of 4 surgical techniques with a mean follow-up of 92months

2014 ◽  
Vol 100 (4) ◽  
pp. S205-S208 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Bacle ◽  
E. Marteau ◽  
M. Freslon ◽  
P. Desmoineaux ◽  
Y. Saint-Cast ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multicenter Study ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Cubital Tunnel ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Comparative Results

MR imaging of the postsurgical cubital tunnel: an imaging review of the cubital tunnel, cubital tunnel syndrome, and associated surgical techniques

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (10) ◽  
pp. 1541-1554 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas G. Rhodes ◽  
Benjamin M. Howe ◽  
Matthew A. Frick ◽  
Steven L. Moran
Keyword(s):  
Mr Imaging ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Cubital Tunnel ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome

scholarly journals Subcutaneous vs Submuscular Ulnar Nerve Transposition in Moderate Cubital Tunnel Syndrome

2009 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dhia A.K Jaddue ◽  
Salwan A Saloo ◽  
Arkan S Sayed-Noor
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Ulnar Nerve ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Cubital Tunnel ◽  
Anterior Transposition ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
And Gender ◽  
Subcutaneous Transposition

Background: The surgical treatment of Cubital tunnel syndrome (CubTS) is still a matter of debate. No consensus exists about the necessity of anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve after decompression. However, this technique is fairly common in clinical practice. Material and Methodology: In the present study we compared the operative technique (incision length, operative time), postoperative care (postoperative pain and complications) and the outcome between subcutaneous transposition and submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve as two surgical modalities in treating moderate CubTS. Between March 2004 and March 2007, twenty six patients with moderate CubTS (according to Dellon’s grading system) were stratified according to age and gender into these two surgical techniques. The two groups were prospectively followed up 2 weeks, 6 months and 12 months postoperatively by the same observer and the operation outcome was assessed using the Bishop rating system. Results: We found that the subcutaneous transposition of the ulnar nerve was associated with shorter incision, shorter operative time, less postoperative pain, less postoperative complication and better outcome compared with the submuscular transposition. Conclusion: The authors recommend the subcutaneous technique when considering anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve in treating moderate CubTS.

The Anatomy, Presentation and Management Options of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (04) ◽  
pp. 393-401
Author(s):  
Arjuna Thakker ◽  
Vinay Kumar Gupta ◽  
Keshav Kumar Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Nerve Damage ◽  
Cubital Tunnel ◽  
Loss Of Function ◽  
Management Options ◽  
Nerve Compression Syndrome ◽  
Clinical Presentations ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Simple Decompression

Cubital tunnel syndrome is the second most common nerve compression syndrome seen in the upper limb. Paresthesia and weakness are the two most common presentations in the hand. If left untreated, compression can lead to irreversible nerve damage, resulting in a loss of function of the forearm and hand. Therefore, recognizing the various clinical presentations of cubital tunnel syndrome can lead to early detection and prevention of nerve damage. Conservative management is usually tried first and involves supporting the elbow using a splint. If this fails and symptoms do not improve, surgical management is indicated. There are 3 main surgical techniques used to relieve compression of the nerve. These are simple decompression, anterior transposition and medial epicondylectomy. Studies comparing the techniques have demonstrated particular advantages to using one or another. However, the overall technique of choice is based on both the clinical scenario and the surgeon’s digression. Following primary cubital tunnel surgery, recurrent symptoms can often occur due to a variety of pathological and non-pathological causes and revision surgery is usually warranted. This article provides a complete review of cubital tunnel syndrome.

A systematic review of medial epicondylectomy as a surgical treatment for cubital tunnel syndrome

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (9) ◽  
pp. 941-945 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva E. O’Grady ◽  
Qureish Vanat ◽  
Dominic M. Power ◽  
Simon Tan
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Methodological Quality ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Cubital Tunnel ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Simple Decompression

The aim of this study was to review the literature of decompression of the cubital tunnel with medial epicondylectomy and to assess outcomes and complications. Twenty-one case series reported on 886 medial epicondylectomies. The mean percentage of patients obtaining improvement of one or more McGowan grade was 79%. The mean percentage obtaining a good/excellent Wilson Krout grade of outcome was 83%. Of six comparative studies, two showed no significant differences in outcomes between medial epicondylectomy and transposition procedures, and three reported better outcomes with medial epicondylectomy. One reported similar outcomes with medial epicondylectomy and simple decompression. The existing literature on medial epicondylectomy is of limited methodological quality and does not allow for firm conclusions to be drawn regarding its efficacy compared with other surgical techniques. Further studies should aim for high methodological quality, randomized comparison with simple decompression or anterior transposition and should utilize standardized outcome measures. Level of evidence: II

A Case of Work-Related Cubital Tunnel Syndrome Due To Repetitive Motions

2000 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 310
Author(s):  
Jung Won Kim ◽  
Insun Won Park ◽  
Youngjoon Won Lee ◽  
Yu Chang Kim ◽  
Pilja Chang Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Cubital Tunnel ◽  
Work Related ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome

scholarly journals Management of cubital tunnel syndrome by anterior trans-muscular transposition of the ulnar nerve

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Shawky Ammar ◽  
Mohamed Ahmed El Tabl ◽  
Dalia Salah Saif
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Ulnar Nerve ◽  
Visual Analog Scale ◽  
Electrophysiological Study ◽  
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Nerve Entrapment ◽  
Cubital Tunnel ◽  
Analog Scale ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Dash Questionnaire

Abstract Background Various surgical options are used for the treatment of ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow. In this study, anterior trans-muscular transposition of the ulnar nerve was used for the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome. Objectives To evaluate the surgical results of anterior trans-muscular transposition technique for the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome with particular emphasis on clinical outcome. Methods Forty patients with cubital tunnel syndrome were operated using anterior trans-muscular transposition technique. Patients were classified into post-operative clinical outcome grades according to the Wilson & Krout criteria, and they were followed up by visual analog scale (VAS), the Disability of Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, electrophysiological study, and post-operative clinical evaluation. Results Forty patients with cubital tunnel syndrome who underwent anterior trans-muscular transposition of the ulnar nerve show a significant clinical improvement at 24 months post-surgery regarding visual analog scale (VAS), the Disability of Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, electrophysiological study, and the Wilson & Krout grading as 87.5% of the patients recorded excellent and good outcome. Conclusion Anterior transmuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve is a safe and effective treatment for ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow.

Evaluation of PROMIS Outcomes for Surgical Treatment of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome With and Without Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Hand ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 155894472110289
Author(s):  
Amy Phan ◽  
Warren Hammert
Keyword(s):  
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Postoperative Period ◽  
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Cubital Tunnel ◽  
Measurement Information ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Measurement Information System

Background: Assessment of outcomes for cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) surgeries has been difficult due to heterogeneity in outcome reporting. Our objective was to evaluate the outcomes for 2 cohorts treated surgically for isolated CuTS and for combined CuTS and carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) using Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Methods: There were 29 patients in the isolated CuTS cohort and 30 patients in the combined CuTS and CTS cohort. PROMIS Physical Function (PF), Pain Interference (PI), Depression, and Upper Extremity (UE) were completed preoperatively and 1-week, 6-weeks, and 3-months postoperatively. Responsiveness was evaluated by standardized response means (SRM). Results: Significant improvements from the 1-week to 6-week postoperative period are shown in the isolated CuTS cohort for PROMIS PF ( P = .002), PI ( P = .0002), and UE ( P = .02), but scores plateau after 6-weeks postoperatively. A similar pattern for the same time points was seen for the combined CuTS and CTS group for PROMIS PF ( P = .001), PI ( P = .02), and UE ( P = .04), with a plateau of scores beyond 6 weeks postoperatively. PROMIS UE was more responsive (SRM range: 0.11-1.03) than the PF (SRM range: 0.02-0.52) and PI (SRM range: 0.11-0.40), which were both mildly responsive for both cohorts. Conclusions: PROMIS lacks the sensitivity to show improvement beyond 6-weeks postoperatively for both isolated CuTS and combined CuTS and CTS. Patients with combined nerve compressions follow similar trajectories in the postoperative period as those with isolated CuTS. Level of Evidence: Level IV.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document