Classification of Tumor Epithelium and Stroma in Colorectal Cancer Based on Discrete Tchebichef Moments

Author(s):  
Rodrigo Nava ◽  
Germán González ◽  
Jan Kybic ◽  
Boris Escalante-Ramírez
2007 ◽  
Vol 45 (05) ◽  
Author(s):  
F Sipos ◽  
S Spisák ◽  
T Krenács ◽  
O Galamb ◽  
B Galamb ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Elene Firmeza Ohata ◽  
João Victor Souza das Chagas ◽  
Gabriel Maia Bezerra ◽  
Mohammad Mehedi Hassan ◽  
Victor Hugo Costa de Albuquerque ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 40 (11) ◽  
pp. S163
Author(s):  
H. Sato ◽  
Y. Koide ◽  
M. Shiota ◽  
S. Matsuoka ◽  
K. Hatta ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshikage Inoue ◽  
Nobuyuki Kakiuchi ◽  
Kenichi Yoshida ◽  
Yasuhito Nanya ◽  
Yusuke Shiozawa ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inti Zlobec ◽  
Michel P. Bihl ◽  
Anja Foerster ◽  
Alex Rufle ◽  
Luigi Terracciano ◽  
...  

JAMA ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 256 (11) ◽  
pp. 1447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deba P. Sarma

Author(s):  
Sanne ten Hoorn ◽  
Anne Trinh ◽  
Joan de Jong ◽  
Lianne Koens ◽  
Louis Vermeulen

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3545-3545
Author(s):  
Inge van Den Berg ◽  
Marcel Smid ◽  
Robert R.J. Coebergh van den Braak ◽  
Mark A van de Wiel ◽  
Carolien H. M. Van Deurzen ◽  
...  

3545 Background: Consensus molecular subtypes (CMSs) can guide precision treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC). Currently available assays can identify CMS1 and CMS4 cases well, while a dedicated test to distinguish CMS2 and 3 is lacking. This study aimed to identify a panel of methylation markers to distinguish between CMS2 and 3 in patients with CRC. Methods: Fresh-frozen tumor tissue of 239 patients with stage I-III CRC was included. CMS classification was performed on RNA-seq data using the single-sample-prediction parameter from the “CMSclassifier” package. Methylation profiles were obtained using the Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip. We performed adaptive group-regularised logistic ridge-regression with post-hoc group-weighted elastic net marker selection to build prediction models for classification of CMS2 and CMS3 based on 15, 10 or 5 markers. Data from TCGAwas used for validation. Results: Overall methylation profiles differed between CMS2 and CMS3. Group-regularisation of the probes was done based on their location either relative to a CpG island or relative to a gene present in the CMS classifier resulting in two different prediction models and subsequently different marker panels. For both panels, even when using only 5 markers, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were > 90%. Validation showed comparable performances. Conclusions: Our highly sensitive and specific methylation marker panel can be used to distinguish CMS2 and 3. This enables development of a qPCR DNA methylation assay in patients with CRC to provide a specific and non-invasive classification tool.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document