MIS Unicondylar Arthroplasty: The Bone-Sparing Technique

Author(s):  
John A. Repicci ◽  
Jodi F. Hartman
2014 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 149-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Riff ◽  
Alexander P. Sah ◽  
Craig J. Della Valle

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 723-733
Author(s):  
Amy J. Garner ◽  
Oliver W. Dandridge ◽  
Andrew A. Amis ◽  
Justin P. Cobb ◽  
Richard J. van Arkel

Aims Bi-unicondylar arthroplasty (Bi-UKA) is a bone and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-preserving alternative to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) when the patellofemoral joint is preserved. The aim of this study is to investigate the clinical outcomes and biomechanics of Bi-UKA. Methods Bi-UKA subjects (n = 22) were measured on an instrumented treadmill, using standard gait metrics, at top walking speeds. Age-, sex-, and BMI-matched healthy (n = 24) and primary TKA (n = 22) subjects formed control groups. TKA subjects with preoperative patellofemoral or tricompartmental arthritis or ACL dysfunction were excluded. The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) were compared. Bi-UKA, then TKA, were performed on eight fresh frozen cadaveric knees, to investigate knee extensor efficiency under controlled laboratory conditions, using a repeated measures study design. Results Bi-UKA walked 20% faster than TKA (Bi-UKA mean top walking speed 6.7 km/h (SD 0.9),TKA 5.6 km/h (SD 0.7), p < 0.001), exhibiting nearer-normal vertical ground reaction forces in maximum weight acceptance and mid-stance, with longer step and stride lengths compared to TKA (p < 0.048). Bi-UKA subjects reported higher OKS (p = 0.004) and EQ-5D (p < 0.001). In vitro, Bi-UKA generated the same extensor moment as native knees at low flexion angles, while reduced extensor moment was measured following TKA (p < 0.003). Conversely, at higher flexion angles, the extensor moment of TKA was normal. Over the full range, the extensor mechanism was more efficient following Bi-UKA than TKA (p < 0.028). Conclusion Bi-UKA had more normal gait characteristics and improved patient-reported outcomes, compared to matched TKA subjects. This can, in part, be explained by differences in extensor efficiency. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2021;10(11):723–733.


Orthopedics ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 443-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derek Dombroski ◽  
Jonathan Garino ◽  
Gwo-Chin Lee

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (07) ◽  
pp. 629-635
Author(s):  
Suzanne Witjes ◽  
Alexander Hoorntje ◽  
Koen L. M. Koenraadt ◽  
Gino M. M. J. Kerkhoffs ◽  
Rutger C. I. van Geenen

AbstractAnteromedial osteoarthritis (AMOA) is a common wear pattern in primary osteoarthritic knees. In patients with bone-on-bone disease, the most appropriate surgical intervention is still a matter of debate. Knee arthroplasty is a well-accepted treatment to relieve symptoms and regain function. Unfortunately, satisfaction is limited, especially related to activities. A cross-sectional study was performed among patients treated with total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and unicondylar arthroplasty (UKA) to determine if the osteoarthritis wear pattern or type of prosthesis affects knee-specific function scores and satisfaction related to activities. All UKA patients (N = 100) were treated for AMOA. Based on radiological assessment of the wear pattern, TKA patients were divided into two groups: TKA for AMOA (N = 68) and true TKA (N = 99). The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (KOOS), new Knee Society score (KSS), anterior knee pain scale, visual analog scales (VASs) for satisfaction about activities, and net promoter score were collected. After 2 years' follow-up, the anterior knee pain scale and VAS satisfaction showed significantly better scores for patients treated with TKA for AMOA compared with the true TKA group. Also in the KOOS subscales, some differences were seen in favor of the TKA for AMOA group. The new KSS was not in favor of a specific wear pattern, but patients with AMOA treated with UKA performed better on the symptoms subscale compared with patients treated with TKA. In conclusion, patients treated with TKA for AMOA showed better knee-specific function scores and satisfaction scores compared with patients treated with TKA for other wear patterns, and only slight differences were found between both the AMOA groups (TKA for AMOA and UKA). Thus, the radiologic assessment of wear patterns might be useful to take into account the shared decision-making process, when discussing expectations, timing, and outcomes with knee osteoarthritis patients considering knee arthroplasty. When AMOA is present, it might be beneficial to choose UKA over TKA.


2006 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 108-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew B. Collier ◽  
Thomas H. Eickmann ◽  
Fumio Sukezaki ◽  
James P. McAuley ◽  
Gerard A. Engh

Author(s):  
Joanne Bloemsaat-Minekus ◽  
Inez Curfs ◽  
Andrzej Lisowski ◽  
Lukas Aleksander Lisowski

2006 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 307
Author(s):  
Matthew B. Collier ◽  
Thomas H. Eickmann ◽  
Fumio Sukezaki ◽  
James P. McAuley ◽  
Gerard A. Engh

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document