scholarly journals Radiation Therapy in Marginal Zone B-Cell Lymphomas

2017 ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
Gabriele Reinartz ◽  
Tobias Weiglein ◽  
Martin Dreyling ◽  
Michael Oertel
Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 3894-3894
Author(s):  
Sedat Demirdas ◽  
Lewin Eisele ◽  
Jörg Hense ◽  
Ulrich Dührsen ◽  
Andreas Hüttmann

Abstract Introduction: Transformed B-cell lymphomas (t-BCL) harbor features of indolent and aggressive disease and it is assumed that transformation conveys an unfavorable prognosis. Because of the ambiguous pathological findings these lymphomas are rarely included into clinical trials. As a result, there is a lack of information about t-BCL patients' short-term and long-term outcomes although very recently a large retrospective analysis detailed the outcomes of transformed follicular lymphoma (t-FL) (Blood June 23, 2015; DOI 10.1182/blood-2015-01-621375). t-BCLs can be separated into a primary type, i.e. transformation at the time of diagnosis, and a secondary type, i.e. transformation after a previous diagnosis of indolent BCL. The present study reports the outcome of patients with t-BCL and also includes indolent lymphomas other than FL. Methods: This is a retrospective, single center analysis of patients with t-BCL seen at the Dept. of Hematology and the Dept. of Medical Oncology at the University Hospital Essen between 1999 and 2015. The departments' archives were screened for patients with primary or secondary t-BCL. A lymphoma was considered transformed when the diagnosis of indolent lymphoma (FL grade 1, 2, 3A; extranodal marginal zone lymphoma (EMZL), nodal marginal zone lymphoma (NMZL), splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL), small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL)) preceded a diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) or other aggressive lymphoma or was simultaneously present. Lymphomas were classified according to WHO 2008 terminology whenever possible. FL with simultaneous grade 3A and grade 3B portions were classified as primary t-BCL. Central pathology review was not performed. Demographic parameters, treatment history, response and outcome data were collected. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The log rank test was used to calculate survival differences, p values > 0,05 were considered statistically significant. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used where appropriate. The ethics committee of the faculty of medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, approved this study (14-5497-BO). Results: 92 patients treated between 1999 and 2015 were identified. 47 (51 %) were female. 38 (41%) suffered from primary and 54 (59%) from secondary t-BCL. Median age at transformation was 60 years (30-87). For secondary t-BCL, time to transformation spanned 2-275 months with a median of 40.5. The treatment approach influenced time to transformation: 33.3 (median) months for observation only (n=20) and 66 months (median) for chemotherapy or rituximab-chemotherapy (n=20; p=0.02). After radiation therapy (n=10) median time to transformation was 32 months. 4 patients received chemotherapy and radiation therapy. FL grade1-3 was diagnosed in 67 patients (73%). Other diagnoses included EMZL (n=9), LPL (n=5), NMZL (n=3) SLL (n=3), SMZL (n=2) and other low-grade lymphomas (n=3). Histology at transformation was DLBCL in 86 patients. FL grade 3B, Burkitt-like lymphoma and aggressive lymphoma, unclassified, were diagnosed in 2 patients each. In primary t-BCL Ann Arbor stages III or IV were found in 25 patients (63 %), extranodal disease was present in 13 (34%), and 7 (18%) suffered from B symptoms. In secondary t-BCL Ann Arbor stages III or IV were found in 41 patients (66 %), extranodal disease was present in 12 (22%), and 11 (20%) suffered from B symptoms. Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index high risk categories at time of transformation were evaluable for 42/67 FL patients and more frequent in secondary t-FL (n=33 (79%)) than in primary t-BCL (n=9 (21%)). Treatment of primary vs secondary t-BCL included CHOP (5/5), R-CHOP (29/23), R-ASHAP (0/10), Burkitt-type protocol (1/2), R-GemOx (0/2), R-ICE (0/2), radiation only (6/0), BEAM + ASCT (0/8), and other regimens. Overall survival (OS) at 5 years was dependent on remission status after first treatment of transformation with 86% for patients in CR, 66% for PR (CR vs PR p=n.s.) and 6% [CI=4.6-38.3] for PD (CR vs PD: p<0.0001) (Figure; 82 evaluable patients). 5-year OS for primary t-BCL was 73.3% and 47.6% for secondary t-BCL, respectively (p=0.0018) (Figure; 92 evaluable patients). Conclusion: In this study primary t-BCL had a favorable outcome when compared with secondary t-BCL. The assumed adverse prognostic impact of transformation may not hold true for primary t-BCL. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Dührsen: Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Hüttmann:Roche: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Other: Travel support; Celgene: Other: Travel support, Speakers Bureau.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Vannata ◽  
Anna Vanazzi ◽  
Mara Negri ◽  
Sarah Jayne Liptrott ◽  
Anna Amalia Bartosek ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Matsushita ◽  
Tomoyasu Kumano ◽  
Kazuhiko Takehara

Primary cutaneous follicle center lymphoma (PCFCL) accounts for the majority of primary cutaneous B-cell lymphomas. We report a 60-year-old womanwith PCFCL. She had a red nodule (25 × 25 mm) on the right side of the lower jaw. She was diagnosed with PCFCL by skin biopsy. And then, she was treated with radiation therapy (total 30.6 Gy), which completely eliminated the nodule. Our case suggests that radiation therapy may be a first choice for PCFCL patients with a solitary lesion or localized lesions.    


The Lymphomas ◽  
2006 ◽  
pp. 381-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emanuele Zucca ◽  
Francesco Bertoni ◽  
Franco Cavalli

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1476-1476
Author(s):  
Victor Bobée ◽  
Fanny Drieux ◽  
Vinciane Marchand ◽  
Vincent Sater ◽  
Liana Veresezan ◽  
...  

Introduction Non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphomas (B-NHLs) are a highly heterogeneous group of mature B-cell malignancies associated with very diverse clinical behaviors. They rely on the activation of different signaling pathways for proliferation and survival which might be amenable to targeted therapies, increasing the need for precision diagnosis. Unfortunately, their accurate classification can be challenging, even for expert hemato-pathologists, and secondary reviews recurrently differ from initial diagnosis. To address this issue we have developed a pan-B-NHL classifier based on a middle throughput gene expression assay coupled with a random forest algorithm. Material and Methods Five hundred ten B-NHL diagnosed according to the WHO criteria were studied, with 325 diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL), 43 primary mediastinal B-cell lymphomas (PMBL), 55 follicular lymphomas (FL), 31 mantle cell lymphomas (MCL), 17 small lymphocytic lymphomas (SLL), 20 marginal zone lymphomas (MZL), 11 marginal zone lymphomas of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) and 8 lymphoplasmacytic lymphomas (LPL). To train and validate the predictor the samples were randomly split into a training (2/3) and an independent validation cohort (1/3). A panel of 137 genes was designed by purposely selecting the differentiation markers identified in the WHO classification for their capacity to provide diagnostic and prognostic information in NHLs. Gene expression profiles were generated by ligation dependent RT-PCR applied to RNA extracted from frozen or FFPE tissue and analyzed on a MiSeq sequencer. For analysis, the sequencing reads were de-multiplexed, aligned with the sequences of the LD-RTPCR probes and counted. Results were normalized using unique molecular indexes counts to correct PCR amplification biases. Results In DLBCL, unsupervised gene expression analysis retrieved the expected GCB, ABC and PMBL signatures (Fig A). These tumors also showed higher expressions of the KI67 (proliferation), CD68 and CD163 (tumor associated macrophages), and PD-L1/2 (immune response) markers. We also observed that the dual expression of MYC and BCL2 at the mRNA level significantly associates with inferior PFS and OS, independent from the International Prognostic Index and from the GCB/ABC cell-of-origin signature, validating the capacity of the assay to identify these highly aggressive lymphomas (Fig C). Overall, low-grade lymphomas were characterized by a significant T cell component. FLs associated with the GCB (BCL6, MYBL1, CD10 and LMO2) and Tfh (CD3, CD5, CD28, ICOS, CD40L, CXCL13) signatures. Other small B-cell lymphomas tended to overexpress activated B-cell markers (LIMD1, TACI, IRF4,FOXP1...), and the expected CD5, CD10, CD23 and CCND1 differential expressions in SLL, MCL and MZL were correctly retrieved (Fig B). Surprisingly, our analysis revealed that the Ie-Ce sterile transcript, expressed from the IGH locus during IgE isotype switching, is almost exclusively expressed by FLs, constituting one of the most discriminant markers for this pathology. We next trained a random forest classifier to discriminate the 7 principal subtypes of B-NHLs. The training cohort comprised 162 DLBCLs (ABC or GCB), 28 PMBL, 35 FLs (grade 1-3A), 21 MCLs, 12 SLLs, and 25 NHLs grouped into the MZL category (13 MZLs, 8 MALT and 4 LPLs). The independent validation series comprised 90 DLBCLs classified as GCB or ABC DLBCLs by the Lymph2Cx assay, 15 PMBLs, 12 FLs (grade 1-3A), 10 MCLs, 5 SLLs and 14 MZLs (7 MZL, 3 MALT and 4 LPL). The RF algorithm classified all cases of the training series into the expected subtype, as well as 94.5% samples of the independent validation cohort (Fig D). For ABC and GCB DLBCLs, the concordance with the Lymph2Cx assay in the validation cohort was 94.3%. Conclusion We have developed a comprehensive gene expression based solution which allows a systematic evaluation of multiple diagnostic and prognostic markers expressed by the tumor and by the microenvironment in B-NHLs. This assay, which does not require any specific platform, could be implemented in complement to histology in many diagnostic laboratories and, with the current development of targeted therapies, enable a more accurate and standardized B-NHL diagnosis. Together, our data illustrate how the integration of gene expression profiling and artificial intelligence can increase precision diagnosis in cancers. Figure Disclosures Oberic: Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Haioun:Miltenyi: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Salles:Roche, Janssen, Gilead, Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Educational events; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: Educational events; BMS: Honoraria; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis, Servier, AbbVie, Karyopharm, Kite, MorphoSys: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Educational events; Autolus: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Educational events; Epizyme: Consultancy, Honoraria. Tilly:roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; servier: Honoraria; merck: Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astra-Zeneca: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; BMS: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria. Jardin:celgene: Honoraria; roche: Honoraria; amgen: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria; janssen: Honoraria.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document