A New Approach on the Protection Against Overheating of Flat Plate Solar-Thermal Collectors

2017 ◽  
pp. 283-295
Author(s):  
Mircea Neagoe ◽  
Ion Visa ◽  
Anca Duta ◽  
Nadia Cretescu
Keyword(s):  
Flat Plate ◽  
Solar Thermal ◽  
New Approach ◽  
Solar Thermal Collectors

scholarly journals Aplicaciones del Captador Solar de Placa Plana y del Captador de Tubo de Vacío en la Edificación = Applications of the Flat Plate Solar Collectors and the Vacuum Tube Solar Collectors in Building

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Ferrández ◽  
Carlos Moron ◽  
Jorge Pablo Díaz ◽  
Pablo Saiz
Keyword(s):  
Flat Plate ◽  
Solar Collector ◽  
Energy Demand ◽  
Hot Water ◽  
Solar Thermal ◽  
Solar Collectors ◽  
Thermal Systems ◽  
Vacuum Tube ◽  
Solar Thermal Collectors ◽  
Flat Plate Solar Collector

ResumenEl actual Código Técnico de la Edificación (CTE) pone de manifiesto la necesidad de cubrir parte de la demanda energética requerida para el abastecimiento de agua caliente sanitaria y climatización de piscinas cubiertas mediante sistemas de aprovechamiento de la energía solar térmica. En este artículo se presenta una comparativa entre las dos principales tipologías de captadores solares térmicos que existen en el mercado: el captador de placa plana y el captador de tubo de vacío, atendiendo a criterios de fracción solar, diseño e integración arquitectónica. Todo ello a fin de discernir en qué circunstancias es más favorable el uso de uno u otro sistema, comparando los resultados obtenidos mediante programas de simulación con la toma de medidas in situ.AbstractThe current Technical Building Code (CTE) highlights the need to cover part of the energy demand required for the supply of hot water and heating of indoor swimming pools using solar thermal systems. This article presents a comparison between the two main types of solar thermal collectors that exist in the market: the flat plate solar collector and the vacuum tube solar collector, according to criteria of solar fraction, design and architectural integration. All of this in order to discern in what circumstances the use of one or the other system is more favourable, comparing the results obtained through simulation programs with the taking of measurements in situ.

scholarly journals Evaluating the Performance of Two Solar Domestic Hot Water Systems of the Archetype Sustainable Houses

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamyar Tanha
Keyword(s):  
Flat Plate ◽  
Hot Water ◽  
Experimental Results ◽  
Solar Thermal ◽  
Energy Output ◽  
Evacuated Tube Collector ◽  
Solar Thermal Collector ◽  
Solar Thermal Collectors ◽  
Evacuated Tube Collectors ◽  
Evacuated Tube

This thesis is focused on the performance of the two SDHW systems of the sustainable Archetype houses in Vaughan, Ontario with daily hot water consumption of 225 litres. The first system consists of a flat plate solar thermal collector in conjunction with a gas boiler and a DWHR. The second SDHW system consists of an evacuated tube collector, an electric tank and a DWHR. The experimental results showed that the DWHRs were capable of an annual heat recovery of 789 kWh. The flat plate and evacuated tube collectors had an annual thermal energy output of 2038 kWh and 1383 kWh. The systems were also modeled in TRNSYS and validated with the experimental results. The simulated results showed that Edmonton has the highest annual energy consumption of 3763.4 kWh and 2852.9 kWh by gas boiler and electric tank and that the solar thermal collectors and DWHRs are most beneficial in Edmonton.

Review of Materials and Environment Management for Solar Thermal Collectors

2014 ◽  
Vol 521 ◽  
pp. 539-542
Author(s):  
Da Yu Zheng ◽  
Juan Zheng ◽  
Xiang Yi Guan ◽  
Jia Zheng ◽  
Yi Ming Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Flat Plate ◽  
Heat Pipe ◽  
Research Work ◽  
Solar Thermal ◽  
Senior Managers ◽  
Solar Thermal Collectors ◽  
Evacuated Tubes ◽  
Evacuated Tube Collectors ◽  
Evacuated Tube

To cover the main contributions and developments in solar thermal collectors through focusing on materials, heat transfer characteristics and manufacturing challenges. A range of published papers and internet research including research work on various solar thermal collectors (flat plate, evacuated tubes, and heat pipe tube) were used. Evaluation of solar collectors performance is critiqued to aid solar technologies make the transition into a specific dominant solar collector. The sources are sorted into sections: finding an academic job, general advice, teaching, research and publishing, tenure and organizations. Provides information about types of solar thermal collectors, indicating what can be added by using evacuated tube collectors instead of flat plate collectors and what can be added by using heat pipe collectors instead of evacuated tubes. Focusing only on three types of solar thermal collectors (flat plate, evacuated tubes, and heat pipe tube). Useful source of information for consultancy and impartial advice for graduate students planning to do research in solar thermal technologies. This paper fulfils identified information about materials and heat transfer properties of materials and manufacturing challenges of these three solar thermal collectors. Describes some changes made to improve the environment which have had unforeseen and adverse effects on safety and the reasons why we need more case histories. Also discusses the reasons why there are no permanent solutions to safety problems and the reasons why senior managers should become more involved in safety problems.

scholarly journals Constant temperature induced stresses in evacuated enclosures for high performance flat plate solar thermal collectors

Solar Energy ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 127 ◽  
pp. 250-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Henshall ◽  
Philip Eames ◽  
Farid Arya ◽  
Trevor Hyde ◽  
Roger Moss ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Flat Plate ◽  
Constant Temperature ◽  
High Performance ◽  
Solar Thermal ◽  
Solar Thermal Collectors ◽  
Induced Stresses

scholarly journals Thermo-Economic Analysis of Hybrid Solar-Geothermal Polygeneration Plants in Different Configurations

Energies ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 2391 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Calise ◽  
Francesco Liberato Cappiello ◽  
Massimo Dentice d’Accadia ◽  
Maria Vicidomini
Keyword(s):  
Flat Plate ◽  
Dynamic Models ◽  
Lithium Ion ◽  
Solar Thermal ◽  
Campi Flegrei ◽  
Condensation Temperature ◽  
Solar Collectors ◽  
Photovoltaic Panels ◽  
Geothermal Well ◽  
Solar Thermal Collectors

This work presents a thermoeconomic comparison between two different solar energy technologies, namely the evacuated flat-plate solar collectors and the photovoltaic panels, integrated as auxiliary systems into two renewable polygeneration plants. Both plants produce electricity, heat and cool, and are based on a 6 kWe organic Rankine cycle (ORC), a 17-kW single-stage H2O/LiBr absorption chiller, a geothermal well at 96 °C, a 200 kWt biomass auxiliary heater, a 45.55 kWh lithium-ion battery and a 25 m2 solar field. In both configurations, electric and thermal storage systems are included to mitigate the fluctuations due to the variability of solar radiation. ORC is mainly supplied by the thermal energy produced by the geothermal well. Additional heat is also provided by solar thermal collectors and by a biomass boiler. In an alternative layout, solar thermal collectors are replaced by photovoltaic panels, producing additional electricity with respect to the one produced by the ORC. To reduce ORC condensation temperature and increase the electric efficiency, a ground-cooled condenser is also adopted. All the components included in both plants were accurately simulated in a TRNSYS environment using dynamic models validated versus literature and experimental data. The ORC is modeled by zero-dimensional energy and mass balances written in Engineering Equation Solver and implemented in TRNSYS. The models of both renewable polygeneration plants are applied to a suitable case study, a commercial area near Campi Flegrei (Naples, South Italy), a location well-known for its geothermal sources and good solar availability. The economic results suggest that for this kind of plant, photovoltaic panels show lower pay back periods than evacuated flat-plate solar collectors, 13 years vs 15 years. The adoption of the electric energy storage system leads to an increase of energy-self-sufficiency equal to 42% and 47% for evacuated flat-plate solar collectors and the photovoltaic panels, respectively.

Flat Plate Solar Thermal Collectors—A Review

2021 ◽  
pp. 197-209
Author(s):  
Dhrupad Sarma ◽  
Parimal Bakul Barua ◽  
Deva Kanta Rabha ◽  
Nidhi Verma ◽  
Soumyajyoti Purkayastha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Flat Plate ◽  
Solar Thermal ◽  
Solar Thermal Collectors

Performance of Flat-Plate and Compound Parabolic Concentrating Solar Collectors in Underfloor Heating Systems

2015 ◽  
Vol 137 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarvenaz Sobhansarbandi ◽  
Uğur Atikol
Keyword(s):  
Flat Plate ◽  
Solar Thermal ◽  
Concrete Slabs ◽  
Solar Collectors ◽  
Heating Systems ◽  
Circulating Water ◽  
Area Reduction ◽  
Floor Slabs ◽  
Common Area ◽  
Solar Thermal Collectors

There is a growing interest in using solar energy in underfloor heating systems. However, the large areas required for the installation of solar thermal collector's array can be discouraging, especially in the apartment buildings where the apartment's roof is a common area. The objective of this study is to investigate the possibility of using compound parabolic concentrating (CPC) solar collectors instead of the commonly used flat-plate collectors (FPCs) in such systems. It is aimed to explore the feasibility of area reduction required by the collectors. Second, the temperature profiles of circulating water loop and the concrete slabs are sought to be examined. The system consists of solar thermal collectors, a storage tank, and circulation of water to transport the heat to four similar floor slabs. The CPC collector outlet fluid's temperature can reach a maximum of 95 °C, compared to 70 °C obtained from the FPCs. The results from the simulations show that a 2 m2 CPC collector array can perform satisfactorily to match the job of an 8 m2 FPC array, obtaining the same required circulating water's temperature in the slabs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document