scholarly journals Principles and Practice of Case-based Clinical Reasoning Education

Author(s):  
Jeff Schwartz

Although problem-based learning (PBL) is widely used in medical education for its many virtues, a number of deficiencies exist. As means of enhancing the experience of PBL for students, two relatively simple adjuncts to PBL are presented. What Ifs are short hypothetical scenarios, appended to the end of a PBL case, that require students to revisit elements of the PBL case just completed and apply their newly acquired knowledge to clinical reasoning in an altered scenario or to explore anew another dimension of the PBL case. Multi-directional symptoms PBL cases are cases where a common presenting symptom, rather than a specific pathology, is the focus of the PBL case and, following a core narrative of the initial patient presentation, a series of independent continuation narratives with appropriate histories, examination findings and investigation results, lead students to divergent diagnoses and management issues. In addition to keeping the PBL process fresh by rotating new materials regularly, these adjuncts extend the PBL process in the direction of case-based learning.


2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 129-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy E. Speicher ◽  
Alexandra Bell ◽  
Marijke Kehrhahn ◽  
Douglas J. Casa

Context: One of the most common instructional methods utilized to promote learning transfer in health profession education is examination of a single patient case. However, in non-healthcare settings this practice has shown to be less effective in promoting learning than the examination of multiple cases with cueing. Objective(s): The primary objective of this article is to provide athletic training educators a rationale for implementing a multiple case-based analogical reasoning technique to improve students' learning transfer. Background: Case-based analogical reasoning is a pedagogical technique that improves problem solving by helping learners identify a common structural principle shared among multiple cases. Identification and transfer of the shared principle facilitates solving novel problems or patient cases. When cueing is coupled with the process, transfer of the structural principle to the problem is enhanced. Description: This article discusses cognitive learning theory and provides empirical evidence to support the use of case-based analogical reasoning to improve athletic training students' clinical reasoning. It also provides the educator practical tips for implementing the technique in classroom and clinical settings. Clinical Advantage(s): Improving the transfer of structural principles may improve solving novel problems in the clinical environment, which should also improve the quality of patient care. Conclusions: Clinical reasoning and learning transfer may be improved among health professional students during a case-based analogical reasoning process when cued to look for the shared structural principle among cases. Students who engage in multiple-case examination with cueing may be more apt to recall their learning and use it when faced with novel cases in the clinical environment.


2019 ◽  
Vol 73 (4_Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 7311505141p1
Author(s):  
Lynne Murphy ◽  
Jennifer Radloff

2007 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. e170-e174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Halil Ibrahim Durak ◽  
Suleyman Ayhan Caliskan ◽  
Serhat Bor ◽  
Cees Van Der Vleuten

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 120
Author(s):  
Jeong Hye Kim ◽  
Sang Hee Kim ◽  
Eun Young Park ◽  
In Gak Kwon

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document