scholarly journals General Geometry of Belief Function Combination

Author(s):  
Fabio Cuzzolin
2002 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Lefevre ◽  
O. Colot ◽  
P. Vannoorenberghe

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Péter Sipos

AbstractStudies comparing numerous sorption curve models and different error functions are lacking completely for soil-metal adsorption systems. We aimed to fill this gap by studying several isotherm models and error functions on soil-metal systems with different sorption curve types. The combination of fifteen sorption curve models and seven error functions were studied for Cd, Cu, Pb, and Zn in competitive systems in four soils with different geochemical properties. Statistical calculations were carried out to compare the results of the minimizing procedures and the fit of the sorption curve models. Although different sorption models and error functions may provide some variation in fitting the models to the experimental data, these differences are mostly not significant statistically. Several sorption models showed very good performances (Brouers-Sotolongo, Sips, Hill, Langmuir-Freundlich) for varying sorption curve types in the studied soil-metal systems, and further models can be suggested for certain sorption curve types. The ERRSQ error function exhibited the lowest error distribution between the experimental data and predicted sorption curves for almost each studied cases. Consequently, their combined use could be suggested for the study of metal sorption in the studied soils. Besides testing more than one sorption isotherm model and error function combination, evaluating the shape of the sorption curve and excluding non-adsorption processes could be advised for reliable data evaluation in soil-metal sorption system.


Author(s):  
Jianping Fan ◽  
Jing Wang ◽  
Meiqin Wu

The two-dimensional belief function (TDBF = (mA, mB)) uses a pair of ordered basic probability distribution functions to describe and process uncertain information. Among them, mB includes support degree, non-support degree and reliability unmeasured degree of mA. So it is more abundant and reasonable than the traditional discount coefficient and expresses the evaluation value of experts. However, only considering that the expert’s assessment is single and one-sided, we also need to consider the influence between the belief function itself. The difference in belief function can measure the difference between two belief functions, based on which the supporting degree, non-supporting degree and unmeasured degree of reliability of the evidence are calculated. Based on the divergence measure of belief function, this paper proposes an extended two-dimensional belief function, which can solve some evidence conflict problems and is more objective and better solve a class of problems that TDBF cannot handle. Finally, numerical examples illustrate its effectiveness and rationality.


SpringerPlus ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaijuan Yuan ◽  
Fuyuan Xiao ◽  
Liguo Fei ◽  
Bingyi Kang ◽  
Yong Deng

2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 1555-1564 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunfeng Lian ◽  
Su Ruan ◽  
Thierry Denoux

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Astride Aregui ◽  
Thierry Denoeux
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document