Social Plasticity: Ecology, Genetics, and the Structure of Ant Societies

2008 ◽  
pp. 129-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jörgen Heinze
Keyword(s):  
2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 1540-1546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel P Neelon ◽  
Gerlinde Höbel

2019 ◽  
Vol 151 ◽  
pp. 29-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin R. Siracusa ◽  
David R. Wilson ◽  
Emily K. Studd ◽  
Stan Boutin ◽  
Murray M. Humphries ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 166 ◽  
pp. 103887
Author(s):  
Camille Desjonquères ◽  
Bretta Speck ◽  
Rafael Lucas Rodríguez
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 255-262
Author(s):  
V. G. Sosnina ◽  
D. M. Saraykin ◽  
L. V. Lipatova

Aim: to study the relationship between sexuality and temperament in patients with epilepsy.Materials and methods. The study included 102 participants: 52 patients with epilepsy and 50 healthy individuals aged from 19 to 45 years. The psychological examination was based on the I-structural test of Ammon (ISTA), the Structure of temperament questionnaire (STQ) of Rusalov, and a clinical interview.Results. Using the correlation analysis we were able to reveal 9 correlations between the types of sexuality and the temperament characteristics in patients with epilepsy; in subjects of the control group – 4 correlations were found. Thus, in patients with epilepsy, constructive sexuality positively correlated with plasticity, social erginess, and pace, whereas in healthy subjects – with social erginess. In patients with epilepsy, destructive sexuality positively correlated with plasticity, social erginess, and social plasticity; in healthy subjects, destructive sexuality negatively correlated with social erginess. In patients with epilepsy, deficient sexuality negatively correlated with pace, plasticity, and social erginess, whereas in healthy subjects – with plasticity and social plasticity.Conclusion. The study shows that the sexuality in patients with epilepsy is more deterministic than that in the comparison group. In addition, all types of sexuality in these patients correlate with plasticity and social erginess, which suggests that patients with epilepsy can be satisfied with sexual relations, show flexibility and strive for diversity while being flexible and socially active. These correlations can be read vice versa, i.e., striving for diversity and social activity in patients with epilepsy is accompanied by satisfaction with their sexual relations and inclination to experiment. 


2013 ◽  
Vol 85 (5) ◽  
pp. 1041-1047 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael Lucas Rodríguez ◽  
Darren Rebar ◽  
Kasey D. Fowler-Finn

2019 ◽  
Vol 194 (2) ◽  
pp. 194-206
Author(s):  
Kasha Strickland ◽  
Céline H. Frère

2020 ◽  
Vol 287 (1928) ◽  
pp. 20200057
Author(s):  
Allison Jaffe ◽  
Madeline P. Burns ◽  
Julia B. Saltz

Social interactions can influence the expression and underlying genetic basis of many traits. Yet, empirical investigations of indirect genetic effects (IGEs) and genotype-by-genotype epistasis—quantitative genetics parameters representing the role of genetic variation in a focal individual and its interacting partners in producing the observed trait values—are still scarce. While it is commonly observed that an individual's traits are influenced by the traits of interacting conspecifics, representing social plasticity, studying this social plasticity and its quantitative-genetic basis is notoriously challenging. These challenges are compounded when individuals interact in groups, rather than (simpler) dyads. Here, we investigate the genetic architecture of social plasticity for exploratory behaviour, one of the most intensively studied behaviours in recent decades. Using genotypes of Drosophila simulans , we measured genotypes both alone, and in social groups representing a mix of two genotypes. We found that females adjusted their exploratory behaviour based on the behaviour of others in the group, representing social plasticity. However, the direction of this plasticity depended on the identity of group members: focal individuals were more likely to emerge from a refuge if group members who were the same genotype as the focal remained inside for longer. By contrast, focal individuals were less likely to emerge from a refuge if partner-genotype group members remained inside for longer. Exploratory behaviour also depended on the identities of both genotypes that composed the group. Together, these findings demonstrate genotype-by-genotype epistasis for exploratory behaviour both within and among groups.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document