Numerical study of shock interactions in viscous, hypersonic flows over double-wedge geometries

Shock Waves ◽  
2009 ◽  
pp. 671-676 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z.M. Hu ◽  
R.S. Myong ◽  
T.H. Cho
1997 ◽  
Vol 352 ◽  
pp. 1-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
JOSEPH OLEJNICZAK ◽  
MICHAEL J. WRIGHT ◽  
GRAHAM V. CANDLER

Computational fluid dynamics has been used to study inviscid shock interactions on double-wedge geometries with the purpose of understanding the fundamental gas dynamics of these interactions. The parameter space of the interactions has been explored and the different types of interactions that occur have been identified. Although the interactions are produced by a different geometry, all but one of them may be identified as an Edney Type I, IV, V, or VI interaction. The previously unidentified interaction occurs because of the geometrical constraints imposed by the double wedge. The physical mechanisms for transition have been studied, and the transition criteria have been identified. An important result is that there are two different regimes of the parameter space in which the state of the flow downstream of the interaction point is fundamentally different. At high Mach numbers this flow is characterized by an underexpanded jet which impinges on the wedge and produces large-amplitude surface pressure variations. At low Mach numbers, the jet becomes a shear layer which no longer impinges on the wedge surface.


1996 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Olejniczak ◽  
Michael Wright ◽  
Graham Candler

2016 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
pp. 1660177
Author(s):  
JIAN ZHU ◽  
YING-YU HOU ◽  
CHEN JI ◽  
ZI-QIANG LIU

Various approximations to unsteady aerodynamics are examined for the unsteady aerodynamic force of a pitching thin double wedge airfoil in hypersonic flow. Results of piston theory, Van Dyke’s second-order theory, Newtonian impact theory, and CFD method are compared in the same motion and Mach number effects. The results indicate that, for this thin double wedge airfoil, Newtonian impact theory is not suitable for these Mach number, while piston theory and Van Dyke’s second-order theory are in good agreement with CFD method for Ma<7.


AIAA Journal ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 55 (9) ◽  
pp. 3227-3230
Author(s):  
B. Q. Meng ◽  
G. L. Han ◽  
C. K. Yuan ◽  
C. Wang ◽  
Z. L. Jiang

Author(s):  
Varun N. Patil ◽  
Deborah A. Levin ◽  
Sergey F. Gimelshein ◽  
Joanna M. Austin

Shock Waves ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z. M. Hu ◽  
R. S. Myong ◽  
C. Wang ◽  
T. H. Cho ◽  
Z. L. Jiang

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document