Incremental Semi-automatic Correction of Misclassified Spatial Objects

Author(s):  
Markus Prossegger ◽  
Abdelhamid Bouchachia
Vestnik MEI ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 117-128
Author(s):  
Oleg V. Barten′ev ◽  
◽  
Dmitriy A. Titov ◽  

Author(s):  
Tengfei Li ◽  
Jing Liu ◽  
Haiying Sun ◽  
Xiang Chen ◽  
Lipeng Zhang ◽  
...  

AbstractIn the past few years, significant progress has been made on spatio-temporal cyber-physical systems in achieving spatio-temporal properties on several long-standing tasks. With the broader specification of spatio-temporal properties on various applications, the concerns over their spatio-temporal logics have been raised in public, especially after the widely reported safety-critical systems involving self-driving cars, intelligent transportation system, image processing. In this paper, we present a spatio-temporal specification language, STSL PC, by combining Signal Temporal Logic (STL) with a spatial logic S4 u, to characterize spatio-temporal dynamic behaviors of cyber-physical systems. This language is highly expressive: it allows the description of quantitative signals, by expressing spatio-temporal traces over real valued signals in dense time, and Boolean signals, by constraining values of spatial objects across threshold predicates. STSL PC combines the power of temporal modalities and spatial operators, and enjoys important properties such as finite model property. We provide a Hilbert-style axiomatization for the proposed STSL PC and prove the soundness and completeness by the spatio-temporal extension of maximal consistent set and canonical model. Further, we demonstrate the decidability of STSL PC and analyze the complexity of STSL PC. Besides, we generalize STSL to the evolution of spatial objects over time, called STSL OC, and provide the proof of its axiomatization system and decidability.


Kant-Studien ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 110 (3) ◽  
pp. 498-511
Author(s):  
Truls Wyller

Abstract I defend what I take to be a genuinely Kantian view on temporal extension: time is not an object but a human horizon of concrete particulars. As such, time depends on the existence of embodied human subjects. It does not, however, depend on those subjects determined as spatial objects. Starting with a realist notion of “apperception” as applied to indexical space (1), I proceed with the need for external criteria of temporal duration (2). In accordance with Kant’s Second Analogy of Experience, these criteria are found in concepts and laws of motion and change (3). I then see what follows from this for a reasonable notion of transcendental idealism (4). Finally, in support of my Kantian conclusions, I argue for the transcendentally subjective nature of particular temporal extension (5).


1989 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 143-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Tejedor ◽  
H Rubio ◽  
A Fernandez
Keyword(s):  

1997 ◽  
Vol 06 (04) ◽  
pp. 423-450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Baher A. El-Geresy ◽  
Alia I. Abdelmoty

In this paper we propose a general approach for reasoning in space. The approach is composed of a set of two general constraints to govern the spatial relationships between objects in space, and two rules to propagate relationships between those objects. The approach is based on a novel representation of the topology of the space as a connected set of components using a structure called adjacency matrix which can capture the topology of objects of different complexity in any space dimension. The formalism is used to explain spatial compositions resulting in indefinite and definite relations and it is shown to be applicable to reasoning in the temporal domain. The main contribution of the formalism is that it provides means for constructing composition tables for objects with arbitrary complexity in any space dimension. A new composition table between spatial objects of different types is presented. A major advantage of the method is that reasoning between objects of any complexity can be achieved in a defined limited number of steps. Hence, the incorporation of spatial reasoning mechanisms in spatial information systems becomes possible.


Atomic Energy ◽  
1962 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 122-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
É. L. Burshtein ◽  
A. A. Vasil'ev ◽  
A. L. Mints ◽  
V. A. Petukhov ◽  
S. M. Rubchinskii

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document