Mechanisms for Scheduling with Single-Bit Private Values

Author(s):  
Vincenzo Auletta ◽  
George Christodoulou ◽  
Paolo Penna
Keyword(s):  
2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert B. Wilson ◽  
Srihari Govindan

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luke Froeb ◽  
Vlad Mares ◽  
Steven Tschantz

2011 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omer Biran ◽  
Françoise Forges

2004 ◽  
Vol 94 (5) ◽  
pp. 1452-1475 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence M Ausubel

When bidders exhibit multi-unit demands, standard auction methods generally yield inefficient outcomes. This article proposes a new ascending-bid auction for homogeneous goods, such as Treasury bills or telecommunications spectrum. The auctioneer announces a price and bidders respond with quantities. Items are awarded at the current price whenever they are “clinched,” and the price is incremented until the market clears. With private values, this (dynamic) auction yields the same outcome as the (sealed-bid) Vickrey auction, but has advantages of simplicity and privacy preservation. With interdependent values, this auction may retain efficiency, whereas the Vickrey auction suffers from a generalized Winner's Curse.


Public Choice ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 138 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 409-422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong Sui
Keyword(s):  

2000 ◽  
Vol 82 (3) ◽  
pp. 439-451 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ted Gayer ◽  
James T. Hamilton ◽  
W. Kip Viscusi

2021 ◽  
Vol 111 (10) ◽  
pp. 3256-3298
Author(s):  
Tristan Gagnon-Bartsch ◽  
Marco Pagnozzi ◽  
Antonio Rosato

We explore how taste projection—the tendency to overestimate how similar others’ tastes are to one’s own—affects bidding in auctions. In first-price auctions with private values, taste projection leads bidders to exaggerate the intensity of competition and, consequently, to overbid—irrespective of whether values are independent, affiliated, or (a)symmetric. Moreover, the optimal reserve price is lower than the rational benchmark, and decreasing in the extent of projection and the number of bidders. With an uncertain common-value component, projecting bidders draw distorted inferences about others’ information. This misinference is stronger in second-price and English auctions, reducing their allocative efficiency compared to first-price auctions. (JEL D11, D44, D82, D83)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document